Good news

comment by Roys Keane (U11635)
posted 9 hours, 51 minutes ago
As opposed to you undermining ole since the start of the season
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Hardly. We probably have the same opinion of Oles ability / capabilities, the difference is I said it.

If it was just wanting Poch and thinking he is better, fair viewpoint, though not one I agree with.

But you wanted Ole sacked before Poch became available. Because he wasn't up to it, because we weren't going to win titles with Ole. Phrase it how you like, you were/are critical of him and wanted him gone.
That is not support.
You pontificate to the rest of us, but don't practise what you preach.
Ed gets more support than Ole frpm you.

52

Go and look over posts from many many on here after one of our poor reports. You will find people criticising Oles tactics, substitutions, team selection and more. But you wont find any from me. All i have said is hes a nicce bloke and means well BUT I think we need better.

The fact that despite this you keep giving me grief tells me this is more about my views on Ole.

Results, not reports

comment by Big McTominay (U22257)
posted 11 hours, 34 minutes ago
comment by Ole-Dirty-Baz ta’rd (U19119)
posted 4 minutes ago
Shaw will improve the defence,but limit us attacking wise. He just doesn't have the ability, or brain of a modern fullback, decent defender. I'd be inclined to give Williams more if a run, maybe put shaw back in for backs to the wall games (if match fit).
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Younger fans allways have to go to the extreme with their opinions.

Shaw is a better defender and theredorenisnshore going forward.

James is rapid so is a pace merchant and little else.

McTominay isnt and never will be at the level we need. Oh, hes very very good actually.

Ridiculous
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ShW IS crap going forward. Not sure how you can argue this (though I couldn't understand your garbled post).

I told everyone to give McT time all along. It was the instant gratification crowd on here who were comparing him to the likes of pogba and finding him come up short (wrongly).

comment by Ole-Dirty-Baz ta’rd (U19119)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by Big McTominay (U22257)
posted 11 hours, 34 minutes ago
comment by Ole-Dirty-Baz ta’rd (U19119)
posted 4 minutes ago
Shaw will improve the defence,but limit us attacking wise. He just doesn't have the ability, or brain of a modern fullback, decent defender. I'd be inclined to give Williams more if a run, maybe put shaw back in for backs to the wall games (if match fit).
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Younger fans allways have to go to the extreme with their opinions.

Shaw is a better defender and theredorenisnshore going forward.

James is rapid so is a pace merchant and little else.

McTominay isnt and never will be at the level we need. Oh, hes very very good actually.

Ridiculous
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ShW IS crap going forward. Not sure how you can argue this (though I couldn't understand your garbled post).

I told everyone to give McT time all along. It was the instant gratification crowd on here who were comparing him to the likes of pogba and finding him come up short (wrongly).
----------------------------------------------------------------------

There we go. Shaw is crap going forward. 🤣

He isnt crap just because he isnt Roberto Carlos or Andy Robertson. He is decent.

comment by Big McTominay (U22257)
posted 27 minutes ago
52

Go and look over posts from many many on here after one of our poor reports. You will find people criticising Oles tactics, substitutions, team selection and more. But you wont find any from me. All i have said is hes a nicce bloke and means well BUT I think we need better.

The fact that despite this you keep giving me grief tells me this is more about my views on Ole.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
About more than

comment by Big McTominay (U22257)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Ole-Dirty-Baz ta’rd (U19119)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by Big McTominay (U22257)
posted 11 hours, 34 minutes ago
comment by Ole-Dirty-Baz ta’rd (U19119)
posted 4 minutes ago
Shaw will improve the defence,but limit us attacking wise. He just doesn't have the ability, or brain of a modern fullback, decent defender. I'd be inclined to give Williams more if a run, maybe put shaw back in for backs to the wall games (if match fit).
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Younger fans allways have to go to the extreme with their opinions.

Shaw is a better defender and theredorenisnshore going forward.

James is rapid so is a pace merchant and little else.

McTominay isnt and never will be at the level we need. Oh, hes very very good actually.

Ridiculous
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ShW IS crap going forward. Not sure how you can argue this (though I couldn't understand your garbled post).

I told everyone to give McT time all along. It was the instant gratification crowd on here who were comparing him to the likes of pogba and finding him come up short (wrongly).
----------------------------------------------------------------------

There we go. Shaw is crap going forward. 🤣

He isnt crap just because he isnt Roberto Carlos or Andy Robertson. He is decent.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He is. Lacks the brain to make good passes, tends to overlap then pass back. No real creativity, awful delivery. He's a good defender, but he has limitations.

I'd like to see Williams given a run.

He isnt crap.

I'd tell Brandon - when he can sit down and eat an entire bucket of KFC - maybe he can bump Shaw out of left back.