or to join or start a new Discussion

44 Comments
Article Rating 4.5 Stars

Keatings

Been all over the radio stations today.

Joke original ref decision.
Joke tribunal decision.
Joke overturn.
Joke organisation.

So, everyone and their dug can see its never a dive - clear contact. It gets voted 2-1 at the tribunal. One member says 'they didn't consider all the evidence provided' so Maxwell sacks them and they'll convene a new one. We might get the correct decision, however...

1. What evidence did this person consider, if any? Seems that video evidence and ref report would be the two obvious. Seems like the cant didn't even look at it?
2. Why did they not consider all the evidence?
3. What other panels have they sat on? Feels like they should be null and void?
4. Has this person been paid for their duties and is that money recoverable?
5. On SSB they said the panel would sit for a day ploughing through various disciplinaries - who was the chair making sure all the evidence was considered and why aren't they being sacked too?
6. Who was the other cant that voted it the right decision and why aren't they being sacked?

Etc.

An utter, utter shambles, riddy and borderline corrupt. The clubs need to sack the lot and get in experts to design an organisation fit for purpose.

comment by Silver (U6112)

posted on 23/2/20

Listened to shortbread for a bit yesterday. Someone lobbed in that perhaps the panel were of the blue persuasion and Keatings had played in the Hibs SCF win.

But THAT would be scarfy, right? No, no, they've fallen on their sword.

I nearly forgot, he was in Celtic youths too. Ah well.

comment by Silver (U6112)

posted on 23/2/20

As a wee aside, I stumbled on this amusing Guardian capture of the UEFA win at Anfield back in the day. I, of course, am being scarfy because Gerrard once played for Liverpool.

https://www.theguardian.com/football/2003/mar/20/minutebyminute.sport

posted on 23/2/20

comment by The Duke (U10059)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by New Magnum. The Mild Drover (U16400)
posted 50 seconds ago
comment by The Duke (U10059)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Zachsda(Need someone run off your land, call the new sheriff) (U1850)
posted 10 minutes ago
I don’t know why folk are having a go at the SFA The clubs could change it in a heartbeat if they acted together
Rangers and Celtic don’t give a fook about Keatings only about bleating when a decision goes against them

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Against them or even for the other
Tribal nonsense
The SFA are rubbish mind you

But clubs and fans are worse
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Now I know I'm not the brightest poster on here but I'm struggling to understand why your response to almost everything is to call it out as scarfy.
The OP is a Celtic fan discussing a matter involving the sfa and a player from a lower league club.
There's seems to be sone interest in it from a number of posters.
Are you suggesting that we shouldn't be interested in this?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m suggesting that we are selective in our interest
Even your point omits who the decision happened to favour
The clip is probably been cut and saved for the next movie

My regular mention of scarfy posting only reflects the scarfy nature of most posts

As Zach says the clubs could stop such by perhaps saying
Morelos deserved the card
The stamp on the Hamilton guy was just that
The baw grabwas little more than a minor foul
The goal was hand ball or offside
Morelos dive was poor

Etc

----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think Silver is being Scarfy at all. I don't see any evidence of scarfiness on this thread.

I suppose if you really want to find it you will.

posted on 23/2/20

comment by New Magnum. The Mild Drover (U16400)
posted 34 seconds ago
comment by The Duke (U10059)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by New Magnum. The Mild Drover (U16400)
posted 50 seconds ago
comment by The Duke (U10059)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Zachsda(Need someone run off your land, call the new sheriff) (U1850)
posted 10 minutes ago
I don’t know why folk are having a go at the SFA The clubs could change it in a heartbeat if they acted together
Rangers and Celtic don’t give a fook about Keatings only about bleating when a decision goes against them

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Against them or even for the other
Tribal nonsense
The SFA are rubbish mind you

But clubs and fans are worse
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Now I know I'm not the brightest poster on here but I'm struggling to understand why your response to almost everything is to call it out as scarfy.
The OP is a Celtic fan discussing a matter involving the sfa and a player from a lower league club.
There's seems to be sone interest in it from a number of posters.
Are you suggesting that we shouldn't be interested in this?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m suggesting that we are selective in our interest
Even your point omits who the decision happened to favour
The clip is probably been cut and saved for the next movie

My regular mention of scarfy posting only reflects the scarfy nature of most posts

As Zach says the clubs could stop such by perhaps saying
Morelos deserved the card
The stamp on the Hamilton guy was just that
The baw grabwas little more than a minor foul
The goal was hand ball or offside
Morelos dive was poor

Etc

----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think Silver is being Scarfy at all. I don't see any evidence of scarfiness on this thread.

I suppose if you really want to find it you will.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A Celtic fan defending a Celtic fan

Could just be coincidence I guess or more scarfyness

posted on 23/2/20

For avoidance of doubt I’m not saying anyone is “scarfy” on this issue
Merely that it’s easy not to be as it doesn’t involve one of they bastirts
The SFA Are a barrel of monkeys but let’s not pretend the clubs do not have the Power to change it, they do
Just not the inclination

posted on 23/2/20

At least they have acted and are convening a new tribunal

posted on 23/2/20

comment by Zachsda(Need someone run off your land, call the new sheriff) (U1850)
posted 6 minutes ago
At least they have acted and are convening a new tribunal
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They might just eventually get it correct
I think the guy misses the final which would be very unfair on him

So let’s hope it’s sorted

posted on 23/2/20

comment by The Duke (U10059)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Zachsda(Need someone run off your land, call the new sheriff) (U1850)
posted 6 minutes ago
At least they have acted and are convening a new tribunal
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They might just eventually get it correct
I think the guy misses the final which would be very unfair on him

So let’s hope it’s sorted
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’d imagine it’s a given the new panel will rescind the original verdict
More importantly(in the long run) they will surely look at the entire process of appeals and compliance it’s a fookin shambles
I still think the criteria for appearing before him/ her is that Michael Stewart analyses the body language and dynamics

posted on 23/2/20

comment by The Duke (U10059)
posted 1 hour, 48 minutes ago
comment by New Magnum. The Mild Drover (U16400)
posted 34 seconds ago
comment by The Duke (U10059)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by New Magnum. The Mild Drover (U16400)
posted 50 seconds ago
comment by The Duke (U10059)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Zachsda(Need someone run off your land, call the new sheriff) (U1850)
posted 10 minutes ago
I don’t know why folk are having a go at the SFA The clubs could change it in a heartbeat if they acted together
Rangers and Celtic don’t give a fook about Keatings only about bleating when a decision goes against them

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Against them or even for the other
Tribal nonsense
The SFA are rubbish mind you

But clubs and fans are worse
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Now I know I'm not the brightest poster on here but I'm struggling to understand why your response to almost everything is to call it out as scarfy.
The OP is a Celtic fan discussing a matter involving the sfa and a player from a lower league club.
There's seems to be sone interest in it from a number of posters.
Are you suggesting that we shouldn't be interested in this?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I’m suggesting that we are selective in our interest
Even your point omits who the decision happened to favour
The clip is probably been cut and saved for the next movie

My regular mention of scarfy posting only reflects the scarfy nature of most posts

As Zach says the clubs could stop such by perhaps saying
Morelos deserved the card
The stamp on the Hamilton guy was just that
The baw grabwas little more than a minor foul
The goal was hand ball or offside
Morelos dive was poor

Etc

----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't think Silver is being Scarfy at all. I don't see any evidence of scarfiness on this thread.

I suppose if you really want to find it you will.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A Celtic fan defending a Celtic fan

Could just be coincidence I guess or more scarfyness
----------------------------------------------------------------------
'Defending

Is he under attack?

posted on 23/2/20

Supporting would be a better word

Sign in if you want to comment
RATE THIS ARTICLE
Rate Breakdown
5
1 Vote
4
1 Vote
3
0 Votes
2
0 Votes
1
0 Votes

Average Rating: 4.5 from 2 votes

ARTICLE STATS
Day
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available
Month
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available
Do Not Sell My Personal Information