or to join or start a new Discussion

73 Comments
Article Rating     Not Rated Yet

Nothing To See Here...

To think there are some on here who think an investigation is totally unnecessary, too!

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-8279919/SPFL-admit-paying-300-000-two-clubs-2016-lack-home-fixtures-Celtic-Rangers.html

There have been/are clearly some underhand shenanigans which have been taking place and, absolutely need to be investigated.

I wonder what else has been going on behind closed doors...

posted on 2/5/20

comment by super phoenix rangers - Banana Lawyer (U14864)
posted 17 minutes ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by super phoenix rangers - Banana Lawyer (U14864)
posted 3 minutes ago
but maclennan when asked by maclennan told maclennan that loans or advances couldn't be made
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think there’s a difference with the end of season payment. Could be wrong on that. I think these advances were for the mid season payment.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
advances all over the shop, except when it doesnt suit celtic.... eh sorry them
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Advances on mid season payments, funded by Celtic, not the SPFL. Not loans based on final league standings.

posted on 2/5/20

comment by super phoenix rangers - Banana Lawyer (U14864)
posted 9 minutes ago
seriously though the whole thing is an utter schittshow and stinks to high heaven.

whether its just incompetence or corruption or both i cant understand why people are defending them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Or perhaps there’s 2 sides to a story, and people are just providing some balance?

I don’t think any poster has said that if rangers evidence is strong enough, then there shouldn’t be an independent investigation. The issue for me just now is the perception of what has taken place, and have Doncaster and the SPFL board (including the CE from rangers) followed the law and their own rules. If they’ve followed the rules agreed by the clubs, then that can’t be put at the door of anyone but the clubs.

Personally, I think it could have been dealt with better, but I don’t think there is ever a way an incident like this could have been dealt with without attracting criticism.

posted on 2/5/20

comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by super phoenix rangers - Banana Lawyer (U14864)
posted 9 minutes ago
seriously though the whole thing is an utter schittshow and stinks to high heaven.

whether its just incompetence or corruption or both i cant understand why people are defending them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Or perhaps there’s 2 sides to a story, and people are just providing some balance?

I don’t think any poster has said that if rangers evidence is strong enough, then there shouldn’t be an independent investigation. The issue for me just now is the perception of what has taken place, and have Doncaster and the SPFL board (including the CE from rangers) followed the law and their own rules. If they’ve followed the rules agreed by the clubs, then that can’t be put at the door of anyone but the clubs.

Personally, I think it could have been dealt with better, but I don’t think there is ever a way an incident like this could have been dealt with without attracting criticism.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think you must be related to doncaster or something

posted on 2/5/20

comment by super phoenix rangers - Banana Lawyer (U14864)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by super phoenix rangers - Banana Lawyer (U14864)
posted 9 minutes ago
seriously though the whole thing is an utter schittshow and stinks to high heaven.

whether its just incompetence or corruption or both i cant understand why people are defending them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Or perhaps there’s 2 sides to a story, and people are just providing some balance?

I don’t think any poster has said that if rangers evidence is strong enough, then there shouldn’t be an independent investigation. The issue for me just now is the perception of what has taken place, and have Doncaster and the SPFL board (including the CE from rangers) followed the law and their own rules. If they’ve followed the rules agreed by the clubs, then that can’t be put at the door of anyone but the clubs.

Personally, I think it could have been dealt with better, but I don’t think there is ever a way an incident like this could have been dealt with without attracting criticism.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I think you must be related to doncaster or something
----------------------------------------------------------------------


I think the right decisions have been made so far. There was no need for the bottom leagues to be kept hanging on, especially if there’s a need for money. There was a meeting yesterday to discuss how they can finish this season. I don’t think how they got to the decisions was dealt with well, but I think that to solely blame one man-or two-and not look at the wider influences is wrong.

posted on 2/5/20

Comment Deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 2/5/20

Be fair.

Everyone hates bstrd oranges.

posted on 2/5/20

‘ Murdoch MacLennan is he not the guy that had previously written articles stating how he "hated" Rangers and wish they were gone/dead?’

No, I don’t think he did write any articles like that, but I’m sure if he did you’ll find them pretty quickly.

posted on 2/5/20

Comment Deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 2/5/20

comment by I got Braga Bragging Rights (U21917)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 1 minute ago
‘ Murdoch MacLennan is he not the guy that had previously written articles stating how he "hated" Rangers and wish they were gone/dead?’

No, I don’t think he did write any articles like that, but I’m sure if he did you’ll find them pretty quickly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm not doing research for you!

I'm sure Rangers called for him to be removed based on comments he made and everything was dealt with the Scottish Football way (swept under the carpet)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For comments he’s alleged to have made, as opposed to articles he’s written then?

posted on 2/5/20

comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by I got Braga Bragging Rights (U21917)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by My POV (U10636)
posted 1 minute ago
‘ Murdoch MacLennan is he not the guy that had previously written articles stating how he "hated" Rangers and wish they were gone/dead?’

No, I don’t think he did write any articles like that, but I’m sure if he did you’ll find them pretty quickly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm not doing research for you!

I'm sure Rangers called for him to be removed based on comments he made and everything was dealt with the Scottish Football way (swept under the carpet)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For comments he’s alleged to have made, as opposed to articles he’s written then?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

When can we get our victim card and paranoia blanket back?

Sign in if you want to comment
RATE THIS ARTICLE
Rate Breakdown
5
0 Votes
4
0 Votes
3
0 Votes
2
0 Votes
1
0 Votes

Average Rating: 0 from 0 votes

ARTICLE STATS
Day
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available
Month
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available