at full time, so what happened? did they rewind back the clock and found a pen for United?
Honestly, I left the game when the BBC page said FT, 2-2.
And it says 90+7 Full time.
That doesn't full time mean FT anymore?
This is ridiculous if FT don't mean that anymore and what next?
Chalk off opposition goal if certain teams are losing?
Also, if this a right decision? I haven't watched the game - I was just looking at full time scores on the beeb.
Browse:
My BBC page says BHA-MU 2-2
comment by He who Dares, waits for Trophies (U15748)
posted on 26/9/20
comment by Pride of the North (U6803)
posted 1 minute ago
Love the rage morespurs, keep it up
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No rage, just standard practice dude.
comment by He who Dares, waits for Trophies (U15748)
posted on 26/9/20
I'd be concerned with them goals leaking at the back!
Whatever happened to Mr "Do you know who I am?"
So much money spent and yet only winning games on pen guys? Doesn't that worry you?
comment by Pride of the North (U6803)
posted on 26/9/20
comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted 37 minutes ago
I'd be concerned with them goals leaking at the back!
Whatever happened to Mr "Do you know who I am?"
So much money spent and yet only winning games on pen guys? Doesn't that worry you?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We all know we’ve been chit recently, don’t think anyone’s said we haven’t been. Still finished 3rd mind you...
comment by *Redinthehead - FreeGaza - فلسطين (U1860)
posted on 26/9/20
Ok the offence occurred before the full time whistle, therefore it stands.
What I’m wondering about is this.. did the game kick off again or did the referee blow the full time whistle as soon as the pen was taken?
posted on 26/9/20
IFAB Law 2 also states: "If at the end of the half, the referee leaves the field of play to go to the referee review area (RRA) or to instruct the players to return to the field of play, this does not prevent a decision being changed for an incident which occurred before the end of the half."
There's an article on Sky Sports clarifying things now
posted on 26/9/20
comment by *Redinthehead - FreeGaza - فلسطين (U1860)
posted 6 minutes ago
Ok the offence occurred before the full time whistle, therefore it stands.
What I’m wondering about is this.. did the game kick off again or did the referee blow the full time whistle as soon as the pen was taken?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He blew immediately
comment by *Redinthehead - FreeGaza - فلسطين (U1860)
posted on 26/9/20
comment by merrysupersteve (monitoring the situation) (U1132)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by *Redinthehead - FreeGaza - فلسطين (U1860)
posted 6 minutes ago
Ok the offence occurred before the full time whistle, therefore it stands.
What I’m wondering about is this.. did the game kick off again or did the referee blow the full time whistle as soon as the pen was taken?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He blew immediately
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So what if the keeper saved it, but was about to be turned in on the rebound?
posted on 26/9/20
comment by *Redinthehead - FreeGaza - فلسطين (U1860)
posted 15 minutes ago
comment by merrysupersteve (monitoring the situation) (U1132)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by *Redinthehead - FreeGaza - فلسطين (U1860)
posted 6 minutes ago
Ok the offence occurred before the full time whistle, therefore it stands.
What I’m wondering about is this.. did the game kick off again or did the referee blow the full time whistle as soon as the pen was taken?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
He blew immediately
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So what if the keeper saved it, but was about to be turned in on the rebound?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
My friend asked the same thing. According to a rule referenced in the article on Sky Sports, the penalty would be the final act of the game. So no rebounds etc
comment by *Redinthehead - FreeGaza - فلسطين (U1860)
posted on 26/9/20
wow.. I don’t think that is wholly fair.
If it was awarded in normal time then the other team would have 30 seconds to try for an equaliser. Ok ... very unlikely, but it’s still a possibility.
posted on 26/9/20
comment by *Redinthehead - FreeGaza - فلسطين (U1860)
posted 1 minute ago
wow.. I don’t think that is wholly fair.
If it was awarded in normal time then the other team would have 30 seconds to try for an equaliser. Ok ... very unlikely, but it’s still a possibility.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
My thoughts exactly. My thought was that you're basically rewinding back to the point of the initial incident, so the final whistle would only be blown once the attack was complete. Which is what refs always, including on this occasion, do
RATE THIS ARTICLE
ARTICLE STATS
Day
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available
Month
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available