or to join or start a new Discussion

176 Comments
Article Rating 3.29 Stars

Klopp power

Klopp and the Liverpool FC have managed to exert their power over the FA and force an official change, before a crucial game in the premier league.

David Coote, who refereed their game against Everton, was due to take his place behind VAR but now has been removed from his duty and changed and Andrew Marriner will now replace him.

This is wrong of the FA to pander to certain clubs and their fans, and could be seen as an unbiased gesture which could be crucial when it comes to the league positions.


GARY NEVILLE raised the same question on twitter : WHY?
https://twitter.com/GNev2/status/1329295044260532230


Sources

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-8859493/David-Coote-DROPPED-referee-VAR-roles-time-season.html


https://talksport.com/football/776566/david-coote-taken-off-var-decisions-merseyside-derby/

https://www.tribalfootball.com/articles/coote-removed-from-var-duty-for-liverpool-clash-with-leicester-4348288

https://www.dailystar.co.uk/sport/football/liverpool-david-coote-leicester-var-23032592

posted 2 weeks, 2 days ago

How is your son morespurs? Hope he is doing OK.

posted 2 weeks, 2 days ago

It could only happen to him really.
————
This is false, You guys literally tried to do it to another poster the other week. He posted on the Southampton board.

posted 2 weeks, 2 days ago

comment by JustYourAverageFan (U21016)
posted 20 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 hours, 24 minutes ago
Actually sandy, I misread his post and was wrong about what he meant - so my apologies to him for that.

But yes, I did agree with that post.

The fact that all he can add is some sort of personal dig as if my opinion is less valuable than his is, however, pathetic... though fairly typical.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
My point was 2 WUM's agreeing with the post should be enough said on how valid it was.

But you're talking about personal digs, then go on to call me pathetic before previously commenting on my ability to read. Classy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

On what basis do you call me a wum?

And how exactly is calling you pathetic not ‘classy’?

I don’t even know who you are. You just follow me around the boards making comments about me. It’s weird.

posted 2 weeks, 1 day ago

comment by montleeds (U18330)
posted 3 hours, 23 minutes ago
reffing is a thankless job. must be very stressful. in this case it wasn't a refs error as much as not knowing the rules. the fa did the right thing by removing him from this game, they are admitting the error but don't have enough refs to demote him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

No it's not a thankless job it's actually very well paid.

And if someone not knowing the rules when it's their job to know the rules is ok then the game is doomed.

As for removing him from the game, that incident happened weeks ago. He should never been given the game and now it just appears as a reactionary from the FA in the face of the scousers crying on Twitter.

classic FA. clueless. Instead of making the right decision in the first place they get it wrong then look like theyre pandering to LFC fans. A lose lose for them.

posted 2 weeks, 1 day ago

comment by Bake 'em away toys (U7303)
posted 16 hours, 36 minutes ago

comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 51 minutes ago
Oh and MoreSpurs - remember that time you posted on the empty Watford board and thought you made a load of friends? Well it was us Liverpool fans who had changed our names to Watford usernames. There'sOnlyOneWatford

You muppet
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Sorry TOOR but if you think this makes morespurs look silly then I'd say you need to have a rethink. I mean, I'm not partisan like some on here in terms of backing "my own" like some are,
------
You're as partisan as anyone else on here. Difference is most people are aware of this whereas you clearly aren't.

Show me one or two of these rants you've made to a Spurs fan? I've never seen it. You're always preaching to the Liverpool flock and never to the Spurs flock so even if what you say were true, you are still biased as anyone else at the core.

posted 2 weeks, 1 day ago

comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 11 hours, 27 minutes ago
comment by JustYourAverageFan (U21016)
posted 20 minutes ago
comment by Winston (U16525)
posted 2 hours, 24 minutes ago
Actually sandy, I misread his post and was wrong about what he meant - so my apologies to him for that.

But yes, I did agree with that post.

The fact that all he can add is some sort of personal dig as if my opinion is less valuable than his is, however, pathetic... though fairly typical.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
My point was 2 WUM's agreeing with the post should be enough said on how valid it was.

But you're talking about personal digs, then go on to call me pathetic before previously commenting on my ability to read. Classy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

On what basis do you call me a wum?

And how exactly is calling you pathetic not ‘classy’?

I don’t even know who you are. You just follow me around the boards making comments about me. It’s weird.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
On Wahl's article a couple of days ago regarding Stevie G would be a good start, or your 600 comment article would be another example as well.

"Follow" you around the boards. If that helps you sleep at night then ok.

posted 2 weeks, 1 day ago

JustYourAverageFan (U21016)

I don't think you know the difference between a joke and a wum.

And what 600 comment article? If you have to go back 6 months then you probably don't have much of a point.

Listen, my post history will show you're wrong.

And let's be honest, so will this article. I joined and discussed the topic. You joined and went straight into a dig at me.

So who's the wum?

Grow up.

posted 2 weeks, 1 day ago

Whatever floats your boat mate, I couldn't care less. You've built a bit of a reputation for being argumentative anyway, that's all that needs to be said.

And if you believe I joined the article to dig at you, then you'd be the one who was wrong. Yes, you were wrong, you read it correctly.

posted 2 weeks, 1 day ago

Yep, I have built that reputation - don't deny it. Am well aware of my faults and have worked to improve on them.

Perhaps you should do the same.

Reality is, you joined and the first thing you did was have a dig at me. So here we are. Maybe if you don't do that in future, this sort of petty squabble won't happen. I'll leave that with you to consider.

posted 2 weeks, 1 day ago

comment by Thorgen Kloppinson - Psychic spies from China try to steal your minds elation (U1282)
posted 5 hours, 10 minutes ago
comment by Bake 'em away toys (U7303)
posted 16 hours, 36 minutes ago

comment by There'sOnlyOneRed's (U1721)
posted 51 minutes ago
Oh and MoreSpurs - remember that time you posted on the empty Watford board and thought you made a load of friends? Well it was us Liverpool fans who had changed our names to Watford usernames. There'sOnlyOneWatford

You muppet
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Sorry TOOR but if you think this makes morespurs look silly then I'd say you need to have a rethink. I mean, I'm not partisan like some on here in terms of backing "my own" like some are,
------
You're as partisan as anyone else on here. Difference is most people are aware of this whereas you clearly aren't.

Show me one or two of these rants you've made to a Spurs fan? I've never seen it. You're always preaching to the Liverpool flock and never to the Spurs flock so even if what you say were true, you are still biased as anyone else at the core.



----------------------------------------------------------------------

Actually, being honest you probably have a point. One I'm certainly not going to argue with. Perhaps I do have that bias in some ways but I don't feel I have it to the level of some. My sort of example would be that I do not defend the dives Kane and Son made the other week. Unacceptable. Whereas some (including Spurs fans) would defend them whilst critisicing other teams doing the same.

But I agree with your point and think its given me food for thought

Sign in if you want to comment
RATE THIS ARTICLE
Rate Breakdown
5
4 Votes
4
0 Votes
3
0 Votes
2
0 Votes
1
3 Votes

Average Rating: 3.29 from 7 votes

ARTICLE STATS
Day
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available
Month
Article Ranking72/500
Article Views1313
Average Time(mins)1.49
Total Time(mins)1773.83