Kane for Haaland

comment by joeymancityz. (U4783)
posted 1 hour, 15 minutes ago
Why on earth would Haaland want to go to Spurs?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You never answered my question the other day about the ‘injustice’ of the CL quarter final

Care to elaborate?

👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼

comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 4 hours, 37 minutes ago
Nope. Why would you swap the best striker on the planet ? Kane is hardly an old man, he’s 27 ffs. He’s got lots of years left in him still. Haaland looks like he’s going to be an unbelievable striker and he already is, but he isn’t better than Kane at this moment in time. If Kane was 33, then maybe but he isn’t, as he’s only 27. No thanks. Kane > Haaland
----------------------------------------------------------------------
👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼

comment by Fred Klopp (U3979)
posted 6 hours, 25 minutes ago
Kane is the absolute best player who will be playing for spurs for a long time (and one of the best in the league) but Haaland is a phenomenon, probably just as good now but with a higher ceiling.

He will go down in the same bracket as Brazilian Ronaldo.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ronaldo is still the greatest forward I've ever seen. That man could do anything and pulled off stuff never seen before. On top of that he made it look effortless. If Haarland is just a pure goal scorer, albeit a great one it still won't make him better than R9. Ronaldo just destroyed opponents before scoring.

comment by Bumble (U6465)
posted 21 minutes ago
comment by Fred Klopp (U3979)
posted 6 hours, 25 minutes ago
Kane is the absolute best player who will be playing for spurs for a long time (and one of the best in the league) but Haaland is a phenomenon, probably just as good now but with a higher ceiling.

He will go down in the same bracket as Brazilian Ronaldo.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ronaldo is still the greatest forward I've ever seen. That man could do anything and pulled off stuff never seen before. On top of that he made it look effortless. If Haarland is just a pure goal scorer, albeit a great one it still won't make him better than R9. Ronaldo just destroyed opponents before scoring.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
People laugh but there was a period of time when I thought Adriano could be even better. Ronaldo was a phenom no doubt but Adriano was just so polished and had an insane shot on him. Scored all types of goals.
Didn't ooze the raw talent of Ronaldo but I personally thought he was better in some areas. Unfortunately his career took a tragic nose dive when his dad passed.

Comment Deleted by Site Moderator

Both play in very different sides at the moment, one full of fast moving attackers and dynamic creativity the other is mostly laboured due to the negative tactics of Mourinho. Which admittedly makes comparisons a bit unfair on each striker.

In terms of performances, what we've seen from both since Haaland fully burst on to the scene you can't seriously suggest Kane has outperformed him. It might well have something to do with club playing styles but you can only judge the reality in front of you. A decent argument might be, was Kane during his prime under Poch as good as Haaland

comment by joeymancityz. (U4783)
posted 6 hours, 17 minutes ago
Why on earth would Haaland want to go to Spurs?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Who said he would you numpty?

comment by GTWI4T- some people deserve to get trolled (U6008)
posted 1 hour, 23 minutes ago
comment by Don_tottenham (U3372)
posted 5 hours, 57 minutes ago
Nope. Why would you swap the best striker on the planet ? Kane is hardly an old man, he’s 27 ffs. He’s got lots of years left in him still. Haaland looks like he’s going to be an unbelievable striker and he already is, but he isn’t better than Kane at this moment in time. If Kane was 33, then maybe but he isn’t, as he’s only 27. No thanks. Kane > Haaland
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Kame isn't the best striker on the planet, but that is each to their own.
I'd also say that when next season starts, kane will be 28. He had actually evolved his game far more than most thought he could so fair play, but....in my opinion he is at his peak now. You may get another 2 years at this level. With Haaland, you could have 10 years of 25 goals a season. As spurs fans, and with emotional attachments I get that it is more complicated but from the outside, it as an absolute no brainer if a swap was on the table.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You may get 2 years or you might even get 7. I mean look at what Lewandowski, Ibra, Ronaldo, Vardy etc. are still doing well into their 30's. No reason why Kane, who has always kept himself fit and healthy can't do the same. Unless you don't look after yourself, I'd say peak age periods for footballers have grown in the modern age.

Haaland is better than Kane anyway. Only just.