or to join or start a new Discussion

496 Comments
Article Rating     Not Rated Yet

The end of Lockdown


June 21st 2021

Everything goes back to normal, according to our Prime Minister.

April 12th: Pubs and restaurants permitted to serve outdoors with table service only.

July 12th 2029: Rangers fans allowed outside.


posted 1 week, 5 days ago

comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by My Partially Peeved POV (U10636)
posted 1 minute ago
Well, hopefully it all gets aired and comes to a conclusion.

FWIW-and again it’s from the little I’ve read on it-neither side looks particularly good in it. The problem for NS is that her position is untenable if they can prove any of these allegations.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

This is it though.

It’s essentially him stating things that he says happened. They just forgot or have no recollection.

So unless someone breaks ranks, they’ll walk.

Sacrificial lambs aside.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So, there’s nothing to prove that he’s telling the truth then? It’s ‘he said, she said’?! For the big parts, I’m assuming.

posted 1 week, 5 days ago

comment by My Partially Peeved POV (U10636)
posted 4 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by My Partially Peeved POV (U10636)
posted 1 minute ago
Well, hopefully it all gets aired and comes to a conclusion.

FWIW-and again it’s from the little I’ve read on it-neither side looks particularly good in it. The problem for NS is that her position is untenable if they can prove any of these allegations.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

This is it though.

It’s essentially him stating things that he says happened. They just forgot or have no recollection.

So unless someone breaks ranks, they’ll walk.

Sacrificial lambs aside.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So, there’s nothing to prove that he’s telling the truth then? It’s ‘he said, she said’?! For the big parts, I’m assuming.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I genuinely don’t know if he has enough “proof” to be honest but have a read. To believe the SG position is to indulge in flights of pure fancy to the point of questioning your sanity it’s that bad.

posted 1 week, 5 days ago

comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by My Partially Peeved POV (U10636)
posted 4 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by My Partially Peeved POV (U10636)
posted 1 minute ago
Well, hopefully it all gets aired and comes to a conclusion.

FWIW-and again it’s from the little I’ve read on it-neither side looks particularly good in it. The problem for NS is that her position is untenable if they can prove any of these allegations.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

This is it though.

It’s essentially him stating things that he says happened. They just forgot or have no recollection.

So unless someone breaks ranks, they’ll walk.

Sacrificial lambs aside.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So, there’s nothing to prove that he’s telling the truth then? It’s ‘he said, she said’?! For the big parts, I’m assuming.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I genuinely don’t know if he has enough “proof” to be honest but have a read. To believe the SG position is to indulge in flights of pure fancy to the point of questioning your sanity it’s that bad.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A ‘balance of probabilities’ decision then?!

posted 1 week, 5 days ago

comment by My Partially Peeved POV (U10636)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 5 seconds ago
comment by My Partially Peeved POV (U10636)
posted 4 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by My Partially Peeved POV (U10636)
posted 1 minute ago
Well, hopefully it all gets aired and comes to a conclusion.

FWIW-and again it’s from the little I’ve read on it-neither side looks particularly good in it. The problem for NS is that her position is untenable if they can prove any of these allegations.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

This is it though.

It’s essentially him stating things that he says happened. They just forgot or have no recollection.

So unless someone breaks ranks, they’ll walk.

Sacrificial lambs aside.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So, there’s nothing to prove that he’s telling the truth then? It’s ‘he said, she said’?! For the big parts, I’m assuming.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I genuinely don’t know if he has enough “proof” to be honest but have a read. To believe the SG position is to indulge in flights of pure fancy to the point of questioning your sanity it’s that bad.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A ‘balance of probabilities’ decision then?!
----------------------------------------------------------------------

The scales are fwcked in one direction mate. Scaffolding is needed.

posted 1 week, 5 days ago

comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by The Crystal Skull from thon Indiana Jones Disa... (U21917)
posted 58 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 36 seconds ago
comment by lauders (U9757)
posted 55 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by My Partially Peeved POV (U10636)
posted 37 seconds ago
If Salmond is sure of his position, then I’m not sure why he’s delaying?! I’m reading that there are limited sections which the crown office are saying have to be taken out, but is that enough to materially affect him putting the nail in NS’ coffin if all that you’ve said is the case?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Not quite.

They’ve redacted from what the Crown Office approved and released.

Strangely enough it appears to be all the accusatory elements.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah. With little notice
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Less than 24 hours

“I’ve got nothing to hide” has now changed to “do you want me to lead you through this pandemic?”
----------------------------------------------------------------------
When it all comes out and if she is proven to have done anything she should leave

“I’ve got nothing to hide” has now changed to “do you want me to lead you through this pandemic?” surely you would support that narrative given your blanket unconditional support for another group of people who act above the law?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Where the hell do you get that from?

Oh yeah. Just another lazy stereotypical pile of unsubstantiated sheite.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
not at all just yesterday you said you will be casting your vote for the Tory regardless of what they do or say.

Patel broke the ministerial code after proven being a bully and she remains a minister after refusing to resign,

Hancock has been proved guilty of acting unlawfully and despite his ridiculous utterings that he has done nothing wrong and again refuses to resign.

but somehow the actions of the FM are different from the actions you supported.

you're bias is showing.

posted 1 week, 5 days ago

comment by The Crystal Skull from thon Indiana Jones Disa... (U21917)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by The Crystal Skull from thon Indiana Jones Disa... (U21917)
posted 58 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 36 seconds ago
comment by lauders (U9757)
posted 55 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by My Partially Peeved POV (U10636)
posted 37 seconds ago
If Salmond is sure of his position, then I’m not sure why he’s delaying?! I’m reading that there are limited sections which the crown office are saying have to be taken out, but is that enough to materially affect him putting the nail in NS’ coffin if all that you’ve said is the case?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Not quite.

They’ve redacted from what the Crown Office approved and released.

Strangely enough it appears to be all the accusatory elements.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah. With little notice
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Less than 24 hours

“I’ve got nothing to hide” has now changed to “do you want me to lead you through this pandemic?”
----------------------------------------------------------------------
When it all comes out and if she is proven to have done anything she should leave

“I’ve got nothing to hide” has now changed to “do you want me to lead you through this pandemic?” surely you would support that narrative given your blanket unconditional support for another group of people who act above the law?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Where the hell do you get that from?

Oh yeah. Just another lazy stereotypical pile of unsubstantiated sheite.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
not at all just yesterday you said you will be casting your vote for the Tory regardless of what they do or say.

Patel broke the ministerial code after proven being a bully and she remains a minister after refusing to resign,

Hancock has been proved guilty of acting unlawfully and despite his ridiculous utterings that he has done nothing wrong and again refuses to resign.

but somehow the actions of the FM are different from the actions you supported.

you're bias is showing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I vote for a certain party because of their overall strategy and you somehow think that means I don’t have issue with many of the things they do or have done?

Is that how your brain works?

Away ye go and stereotype elsewhere.

posted 1 week, 5 days ago

comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 52 seconds ago
comment by The Crystal Skull from thon Indiana Jones Disa... (U21917)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by The Crystal Skull from thon Indiana Jones Disa... (U21917)
posted 58 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 36 seconds ago
comment by lauders (U9757)
posted 55 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by My Partially Peeved POV (U10636)
posted 37 seconds ago
If Salmond is sure of his position, then I’m not sure why he’s delaying?! I’m reading that there are limited sections which the crown office are saying have to be taken out, but is that enough to materially affect him putting the nail in NS’ coffin if all that you’ve said is the case?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Not quite.

They’ve redacted from what the Crown Office approved and released.

Strangely enough it appears to be all the accusatory elements.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah. With little notice
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Less than 24 hours

“I’ve got nothing to hide” has now changed to “do you want me to lead you through this pandemic?”
----------------------------------------------------------------------
When it all comes out and if she is proven to have done anything she should leave

“I’ve got nothing to hide” has now changed to “do you want me to lead you through this pandemic?” surely you would support that narrative given your blanket unconditional support for another group of people who act above the law?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Where the hell do you get that from?

Oh yeah. Just another lazy stereotypical pile of unsubstantiated sheite.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
not at all just yesterday you said you will be casting your vote for the Tory regardless of what they do or say.

Patel broke the ministerial code after proven being a bully and she remains a minister after refusing to resign,

Hancock has been proved guilty of acting unlawfully and despite his ridiculous utterings that he has done nothing wrong and again refuses to resign.

but somehow the actions of the FM are different from the actions you supported.

you're bias is showing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I vote for a certain party because of their overall strategy and you somehow think that means I don’t have issue with many of the things they do or have done?

Is that how your brain works?

Away ye go and stereotype elsewhere.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
do explain to me the strategy you adore?

is it keeping the foreign people out?

it probably is

it usually is

posted 1 week, 5 days ago

comment by The Crystal Skull from thon Indiana Jones Disa... (U21917)
posted 20 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 52 seconds ago
comment by The Crystal Skull from thon Indiana Jones Disa... (U21917)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by The Crystal Skull from thon Indiana Jones Disa... (U21917)
posted 58 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 36 seconds ago
comment by lauders (U9757)
posted 55 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by My Partially Peeved POV (U10636)
posted 37 seconds ago
If Salmond is sure of his position, then I’m not sure why he’s delaying?! I’m reading that there are limited sections which the crown office are saying have to be taken out, but is that enough to materially affect him putting the nail in NS’ coffin if all that you’ve said is the case?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Not quite.

They’ve redacted from what the Crown Office approved and released.

Strangely enough it appears to be all the accusatory elements.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah. With little notice
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Less than 24 hours

“I’ve got nothing to hide” has now changed to “do you want me to lead you through this pandemic?”
----------------------------------------------------------------------
When it all comes out and if she is proven to have done anything she should leave

“I’ve got nothing to hide” has now changed to “do you want me to lead you through this pandemic?” surely you would support that narrative given your blanket unconditional support for another group of people who act above the law?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Where the hell do you get that from?

Oh yeah. Just another lazy stereotypical pile of unsubstantiated sheite.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
not at all just yesterday you said you will be casting your vote for the Tory regardless of what they do or say.

Patel broke the ministerial code after proven being a bully and she remains a minister after refusing to resign,

Hancock has been proved guilty of acting unlawfully and despite his ridiculous utterings that he has done nothing wrong and again refuses to resign.

but somehow the actions of the FM are different from the actions you supported.

you're bias is showing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I vote for a certain party because of their overall strategy and you somehow think that means I don’t have issue with many of the things they do or have done?

Is that how your brain works?

Away ye go and stereotype elsewhere.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
do explain to me the strategy you adore?

is it keeping the foreign people out?

it probably is

it usually is
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Yes. Hope you’re foreign.

Now fwck off you interminable bore. No time to spend on an idiot. Ta ta

posted 1 week, 5 days ago

comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by The Crystal Skull from thon Indiana Jones Disa... (U21917)
posted 20 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 52 seconds ago
comment by The Crystal Skull from thon Indiana Jones Disa... (U21917)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by The Crystal Skull from thon Indiana Jones Disa... (U21917)
posted 58 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 36 seconds ago
comment by lauders (U9757)
posted 55 seconds ago
comment by Gingernuts (U2992)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by My Partially Peeved POV (U10636)
posted 37 seconds ago
If Salmond is sure of his position, then I’m not sure why he’s delaying?! I’m reading that there are limited sections which the crown office are saying have to be taken out, but is that enough to materially affect him putting the nail in NS’ coffin if all that you’ve said is the case?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Not quite.

They’ve redacted from what the Crown Office approved and released.

Strangely enough it appears to be all the accusatory elements.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah. With little notice
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Less than 24 hours

“I’ve got nothing to hide” has now changed to “do you want me to lead you through this pandemic?”
----------------------------------------------------------------------
When it all comes out and if she is proven to have done anything she should leave

“I’ve got nothing to hide” has now changed to “do you want me to lead you through this pandemic?” surely you would support that narrative given your blanket unconditional support for another group of people who act above the law?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Where the hell do you get that from?

Oh yeah. Just another lazy stereotypical pile of unsubstantiated sheite.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
not at all just yesterday you said you will be casting your vote for the Tory regardless of what they do or say.

Patel broke the ministerial code after proven being a bully and she remains a minister after refusing to resign,

Hancock has been proved guilty of acting unlawfully and despite his ridiculous utterings that he has done nothing wrong and again refuses to resign.

but somehow the actions of the FM are different from the actions you supported.

you're bias is showing.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I vote for a certain party because of their overall strategy and you somehow think that means I don’t have issue with many of the things they do or have done?

Is that how your brain works?

Away ye go and stereotype elsewhere.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
do explain to me the strategy you adore?

is it keeping the foreign people out?

it probably is

it usually is
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Yes. Hope you’re foreign.

Now fwck off you interminable bore. No time to spend on an idiot. Ta ta
----------------------------------------------------------------------
with abit of luck hopefully I won't be a british citizen in a few years.

Cya

comment by Silver (U6112)

posted 1 week, 5 days ago

They've redacted a criticism of Nic that wasn't even court evidence. She just isn't having it.

They both fckd it. Even getting away with calling it 'the Salmond enquiry' giving Joe Public the impression the enquiry is into him again rather than the Scottish Gov enquiry into how they fckd it big style.

BTW, found out why she dislikes the bevvy so much - from her wiki - "In the mid-1990s Sturgeon and Charles Kennedy went together on a political study visit to Australia."

Sign in if you want to comment
RATE THIS ARTICLE
Rate Breakdown
5
0 Votes
4
0 Votes
3
0 Votes
2
0 Votes
1
0 Votes

Average Rating: 0 from 0 votes

ARTICLE STATS
Day
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available
Month
Article Ranking27/500
Article Views2942
Average Time(mins)1.85
Total Time(mins)5134.73