Met police

People in the police are not necessarily thick. They were just bullied at school and rejected by women so craved power to compensate for this. It's a bit presumptuous to suggest they didn't get good grades.

comment by Fat Pranks (U22336)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by aagggghhhh (U20564)
posted 58 minutes ago
comment by Fat Pranks (U22336)
posted 1 hour, 29 minutes ago
comment by aagggghhhh (U20564)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Fat Pranks (U22336)
posted 50 minutes ago
comment by aagggghhhh (U20564)
posted 2 hours, 39 minutes ago
comment by Fat Pranks (U22336)
posted 19 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by Zachsda( Sorry Mr. I broke yer bench) (U1850)
posted 29 minutes ago
comment by Ruiney (U1005)
posted 36 seconds ago
comment by Fat Pranks (U22336)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Ruiney (U1005)
posted 11 minutes ago
These people were warned they would be fined if they broke the rules but turned up anyways
...

They didn’t just fine them though did they?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
so when they’re told to go home and refuse what do want the police to do
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not force a peaceful vigil to turn violent? Just a thought.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To be fair some of them were carrying tea lights could cause all sorts of harm with them
----------------------------------------------------------------------

People want to break the law. Fine! face the consequences. Whats the difference between last night's gathering and an illegal rave of 100s of people in these covid lockdown times? Nothing.

Surely, just "because they are women" is the exact argument that those wanting equality would be arguing against
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well, it was outside for a start off.
I would have thought the chances of finding drugs, drunkenness was unlikely.
The organisers wanted to liaise with the police, unlike rave organisers.
There's three differences of the top of my head.

Never having lived in London I know little about the Met, but all my live I've found the police to be excellent.
But last night they got it wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Outside inside who gives a fack, we have restrictions in place because of a global pandemic.

Get over yourself and play by the rules, if you don’t expect the police to move you on.

It’s not like they weren’t warned ffs
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So what you're saying is, you're not allowed to protest because the police tell you so, what if you're protesting them? As in this case, at least partially. Oh and please look up what the word 'tautology' means, the only thing more brain meltingly annoying than people using covid as an excuse for near enough everything is when people write or say it incorrectly. To be fair, the press are the worst culprit for this, "global pandemic" indeed!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes it’s against law.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How succinctly put, a shame its wrong though, against the rules yes, illegal, no. The fact that any 'civilised' society should be able to protest against the police seems to be lost on you for some reason. You can't write or think coherently, a police officer by chance? Also, is that the only post you've ever put on here without an emoji? Other than the reply obviously.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cry me a river will you, these measures are in place because of a pandemic.
Write or think coherentlyAnd all coppers are thick right, well obviously not as smart as a hard man keyboard warrior like yourself who resorts to personal insults because of a difference of opinion.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A global pandemic you mean? I didn't resort to personal insults, I asked a question and pointed out a fact. These measurements are in place and accepted because people cannot see beyond themselves and their own situations, hence a minority complain and get insulted. I didn't, at any point provide an opinion, until just then, I was just asking questions. The fact that you decided, straight away to go on the offensive says more about you than me to be fair. Keyboard warrior eh!? What a strange way to take an interested party.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Offensive by stating we have restrictions in place, really offensive that

I can’t write or think coherently not a personal insult these days

Carry on hard man.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Offensive by lazily calling me a keyboard warrior, when I've given no such impression. The fact that you can't write or think coherently isn't an insult, it's just an observation, one which anybody who has read your posts would understand, you are just so achingly dull and obvious, in everything you post, it's kind of hard work to even read, you're that thick. That's an insult by the way, in case you're struggling. I was mainly just bored after work, hence the comments, I'm surprised that people can't engage in debate without emojis or instant insults, not great ones I grant you. On to "hard man" what does that even mean?! Are you coming on to me, or is it the usual, not smart enough to debate, so deflection will do?

comment by aagggghhhh (U20564)
posted 54 seconds ago
comment by Fat Pranks (U22336)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by aagggghhhh (U20564)
posted 58 minutes ago
comment by Fat Pranks (U22336)
posted 1 hour, 29 minutes ago
comment by aagggghhhh (U20564)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Fat Pranks (U22336)
posted 50 minutes ago
comment by aagggghhhh (U20564)
posted 2 hours, 39 minutes ago
comment by Fat Pranks (U22336)
posted 19 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by Zachsda( Sorry Mr. I broke yer bench) (U1850)
posted 29 minutes ago
comment by Ruiney (U1005)
posted 36 seconds ago
comment by Fat Pranks (U22336)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Ruiney (U1005)
posted 11 minutes ago
These people were warned they would be fined if they broke the rules but turned up anyways
...

They didn’t just fine them though did they?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
so when they’re told to go home and refuse what do want the police to do
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not force a peaceful vigil to turn violent? Just a thought.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To be fair some of them were carrying tea lights could cause all sorts of harm with them
----------------------------------------------------------------------

People want to break the law. Fine! face the consequences. Whats the difference between last night's gathering and an illegal rave of 100s of people in these covid lockdown times? Nothing.

Surely, just "because they are women" is the exact argument that those wanting equality would be arguing against
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well, it was outside for a start off.
I would have thought the chances of finding drugs, drunkenness was unlikely.
The organisers wanted to liaise with the police, unlike rave organisers.
There's three differences of the top of my head.

Never having lived in London I know little about the Met, but all my live I've found the police to be excellent.
But last night they got it wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Outside inside who gives a fack, we have restrictions in place because of a global pandemic.

Get over yourself and play by the rules, if you don’t expect the police to move you on.

It’s not like they weren’t warned ffs
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So what you're saying is, you're not allowed to protest because the police tell you so, what if you're protesting them? As in this case, at least partially. Oh and please look up what the word 'tautology' means, the only thing more brain meltingly annoying than people using covid as an excuse for near enough everything is when people write or say it incorrectly. To be fair, the press are the worst culprit for this, "global pandemic" indeed!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes it’s against law.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How succinctly put, a shame its wrong though, against the rules yes, illegal, no. The fact that any 'civilised' society should be able to protest against the police seems to be lost on you for some reason. You can't write or think coherently, a police officer by chance? Also, is that the only post you've ever put on here without an emoji? Other than the reply obviously.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cry me a river will you, these measures are in place because of a pandemic.
Write or think coherentlyAnd all coppers are thick right, well obviously not as smart as a hard man keyboard warrior like yourself who resorts to personal insults because of a difference of opinion.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A global pandemic you mean? I didn't resort to personal insults, I asked a question and pointed out a fact. These measurements are in place and accepted because people cannot see beyond themselves and their own situations, hence a minority complain and get insulted. I didn't, at any point provide an opinion, until just then, I was just asking questions. The fact that you decided, straight away to go on the offensive says more about you than me to be fair. Keyboard warrior eh!? What a strange way to take an interested party.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Offensive by stating we have restrictions in place, really offensive that

I can’t write or think coherently not a personal insult these days

Carry on hard man.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Offensive by lazily calling me a keyboard warrior, when I've given no such impression. The fact that you can't write or think coherently isn't an insult, it's just an observation, one which anybody who has read your posts would understand, you are just so achingly dull and obvious, in everything you post, it's kind of hard work to even read, you're that thick. That's an insult by the way, in case you're struggling. I was mainly just bored after work, hence the comments, I'm surprised that people can't engage in debate without emojis or instant insults, not great ones I grant you. On to "hard man" what does that even mean?! Are you coming on to me, or is it the usual, not smart enough to debate, so deflection will do?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Internet hard man confirmed, like I said

What is it you do pranks?

comment by Fat Pranks (U22336)
posted 23 minutes ago
comment by aagggghhhh (U20564)
posted 54 seconds ago
comment by Fat Pranks (U22336)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by aagggghhhh (U20564)
posted 58 minutes ago
comment by Fat Pranks (U22336)
posted 1 hour, 29 minutes ago
comment by aagggghhhh (U20564)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Fat Pranks (U22336)
posted 50 minutes ago
comment by aagggghhhh (U20564)
posted 2 hours, 39 minutes ago
comment by Fat Pranks (U22336)
posted 19 minutes ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 10 minutes ago
comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by Zachsda( Sorry Mr. I broke yer bench) (U1850)
posted 29 minutes ago
comment by Ruiney (U1005)
posted 36 seconds ago
comment by Fat Pranks (U22336)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Ruiney (U1005)
posted 11 minutes ago
These people were warned they would be fined if they broke the rules but turned up anyways
...

They didn’t just fine them though did they?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
so when they’re told to go home and refuse what do want the police to do
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Not force a peaceful vigil to turn violent? Just a thought.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To be fair some of them were carrying tea lights could cause all sorts of harm with them
----------------------------------------------------------------------

People want to break the law. Fine! face the consequences. Whats the difference between last night's gathering and an illegal rave of 100s of people in these covid lockdown times? Nothing.

Surely, just "because they are women" is the exact argument that those wanting equality would be arguing against
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well, it was outside for a start off.
I would have thought the chances of finding drugs, drunkenness was unlikely.
The organisers wanted to liaise with the police, unlike rave organisers.
There's three differences of the top of my head.

Never having lived in London I know little about the Met, but all my live I've found the police to be excellent.
But last night they got it wrong.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Outside inside who gives a fack, we have restrictions in place because of a global pandemic.

Get over yourself and play by the rules, if you don’t expect the police to move you on.

It’s not like they weren’t warned ffs
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So what you're saying is, you're not allowed to protest because the police tell you so, what if you're protesting them? As in this case, at least partially. Oh and please look up what the word 'tautology' means, the only thing more brain meltingly annoying than people using covid as an excuse for near enough everything is when people write or say it incorrectly. To be fair, the press are the worst culprit for this, "global pandemic" indeed!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes it’s against law.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
How succinctly put, a shame its wrong though, against the rules yes, illegal, no. The fact that any 'civilised' society should be able to protest against the police seems to be lost on you for some reason. You can't write or think coherently, a police officer by chance? Also, is that the only post you've ever put on here without an emoji? Other than the reply obviously.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cry me a river will you, these measures are in place because of a pandemic.
Write or think coherentlyAnd all coppers are thick right, well obviously not as smart as a hard man keyboard warrior like yourself who resorts to personal insults because of a difference of opinion.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A global pandemic you mean? I didn't resort to personal insults, I asked a question and pointed out a fact. These measurements are in place and accepted because people cannot see beyond themselves and their own situations, hence a minority complain and get insulted. I didn't, at any point provide an opinion, until just then, I was just asking questions. The fact that you decided, straight away to go on the offensive says more about you than me to be fair. Keyboard warrior eh!? What a strange way to take an interested party.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Offensive by stating we have restrictions in place, really offensive that

I can’t write or think coherently not a personal insult these days

Carry on hard man.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Offensive by lazily calling me a keyboard warrior, when I've given no such impression. The fact that you can't write or think coherently isn't an insult, it's just an observation, one which anybody who has read your posts would understand, you are just so achingly dull and obvious, in everything you post, it's kind of hard work to even read, you're that thick. That's an insult by the way, in case you're struggling. I was mainly just bored after work, hence the comments, I'm surprised that people can't engage in debate without emojis or instant insults, not great ones I grant you. On to "hard man" what does that even mean?! Are you coming on to me, or is it the usual, not smart enough to debate, so deflection will do?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Internet hard man confirmed, like I said
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Maybe I've misunderstood what a Internet hard man is. I assumed it was swearing idiots with nothing to offer, perhaps it's someone who points out some faults in an argument. My bad apparently.

comment by Danny Mullen (U1734)
posted 24 minutes ago
What is it you do pranks?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Gets hammered drunk around his foster kids if his summer posts are anything to go by.

comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 47 minutes ago
comment by RB&W (U21434)
posted 34 minutes ago
comment by 🇬🇧 ThE ReVoLuTiOn Is HeRe 🇬🇧 (U22182)
posted 11 minutes ago
Too many, fat ugly lesbians just jumping on the bandwagon in order to protest - but deep down all they’re protesting against is they that no one pays them any attention whatsoever
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Priti Patel is very fat. Huge fat ar5e.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I assume that you’re secretly dating Emily Ratajkowski yeah?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
EMILY RATAJKOWSKI ANNOUNCES BIRTH OF FIRST CHILD WHO SHE’LL RAISE TO CHOOSE THEIR OWN GENDER

comment by 🇬🇧 ThE ReVoLuTiOn Is HeRe 🇬🇧 (U22182)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Sat Nav (U18243)
posted 47 minutes ago
comment by RB&W (U21434)
posted 34 minutes ago
comment by 🇬🇧 ThE ReVoLuTiOn Is HeRe 🇬🇧 (U22182)
posted 11 minutes ago
Too many, fat ugly lesbians just jumping on the bandwagon in order to protest - but deep down all they’re protesting against is they that no one pays them any attention whatsoever
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Priti Patel is very fat. Huge fat ar5e.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I assume that you’re secretly dating Emily Ratajkowski yeah?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
EMILY RATAJKOWSKI ANNOUNCES BIRTH OF FIRST CHILD WHO SHE’LL RAISE TO CHOOSE THEIR OWN GENDER
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bah

What a shame. Stupid Californians

I support the Met police action. They are mandated to uphold the law. It is usually a thankless task. In many situations, like this last one, they have to deal with an over-excited and often incited group of people who are breaking the law. Whether people agree with a law or not the police are duty bound to enforce it. They usually do this with remarkable restraint unless a superior officer decides that the situation is untenable and the safety of members of the public and the police are at serious risk. It doesn't matter if you are terrorists or a mindless herd of protesters, those officers do their job.
My vote goes to the police

Pranks?