Yet more "we are sorry" noises coming out of this toxic club. This time Ole at yet another Utd press conference ( too many of those too )
So a week on from fans not only rioting in the street, and the stadium ( ignoring covid implications / laws ), assault of police officers and damage to property, all I keep hearing is support for what the people did.
Not to mention Utd's clearly no existent control of their stadium security.
Where is the action form the FA in terms of fines, sanctions and penalties ?
Why have Sky not yet sacked Gary Neville for basically allowing his support for the club as a fan, get in the way of rational behavior expected from people on national tv ?
Why are the police not looking to prosecute ?
Yet, all I hear is sympathy for this, sympathy for that, as if any of these actions are remotely justified.
I keep hearing how the Glasiers have been the pantomime villain for years, but statics do not bear this out in terms of net ( or gross ) spend of the playing staff. Plus, do Utd fans think they are the only hard done set of fans ? suggest take a look at Levy's investment in the actual playing staff. No Utd fans are not different to any other set of fans at any big club in the UK, and are certainly not entitled to act contrary to both the law and rational human behaviour.
Is this constant "woe is me" just a smokescreen for fans who have had to watch others take their spot at at the top, together with frustration because "we don't win the title anymore"
Just seems to me there a couple of clubs who are basically aloud to do whatever they want, including breaking FA laws, and actual laws governing what you can and cant do in the country.
Yet another Utd sorry article
posted on 5/5/21
The OP's ESL dreams dashed
Big 6 club
posted on 5/5/21
comment by Tway (U1162)
posted 35 minutes ago
Having a chicken on their crest says it all, most of them need to crow up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
easy for rooster say
posted on 5/5/21
Should be a Blue-Tit if they want an avian symbol on their crest.
posted on 5/5/21
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 10 seconds ago
Should be a Blue-Tit if they want an avian symbol on their crest.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
already taken:
https://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2012/05/08/article-0-12F7BFF7000005DC-887_634x474.jpg
posted on 5/5/21
comment by Don Draper's dandruff (U20155)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Tway (U1162)
posted 35 minutes ago
Having a chicken on their crest says it all, most of them need to crow up.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
easy for rooster say
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's a fowl
posted on 5/5/21
Haven’t read the article but I accept your apology SteveF
posted on 5/5/21
comment by morespurs (U15748)
posted 1 hour, 33 minutes ago
comment by rosso - time to #takefootballback #GlazersOut (U17054)
posted 1 hour, 38 minutes ago
I mean, this is a sharticle on so many different levels that it really should be used as Case Study #1 in chapter number one of the next edition of Sharticles for Dummies.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh yeah "Sharticles for dummies" which it seems you know so well about and must own a copy or two
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why would I own two copies of the same book?
And if I had hypothetically bought a copy of Sharticles for Dummies - and I know I’m probably risking blowing your mind here, so I’ll try to go slowly, spunky - given the entire raison d’être (look it up in French Loan Phrases for Dummies) of the series, would that not suggest that I wasn’t any kind of an expert in writing sharticles?
posted on 5/5/21
comment by rosso - time to #takefootballback #GlazersOut (U17054)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why would I own two copies of the same book?
And if I had hypothetically bought a copy of Sharticles for Dummies - and I know I’m probably risking blowing your mind here, so I’ll try to go slowly, spunky - given the entire raison d’être (look it up in French Loan Phrases for Dummies) of the series, would that not suggest that I wasn’t any kind of an expert in writing sharticles?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
dummy
posted on 5/5/21
comment by Don Draper's dandruff (U20155)
posted 12 seconds ago
comment by rosso - time to #takefootballback #GlazersOut (U17054)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why would I own two copies of the same book?
And if I had hypothetically bought a copy of Sharticles for Dummies - and I know I’m probably risking blowing your mind here, so I’ll try to go slowly, spunky - given the entire raison d’être (look it up in French Loan Phrases for Dummies) of the series, would that not suggest that I wasn’t any kind of an expert in writing sharticles?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
dummy
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I mean, I’m not denying that
posted on 5/5/21
What a complete mess this is!
How dare Man Utd have another press conference the day before a European match, the gits