Haaland or Mbappe?

Haaland. Mbappe is quality but gets overrated.

comment by Gillespie Rd. (U18361)
posted 3 hours, 3 minutes ago
Haaland is decent in the air, decent with both feet, and has bags of pace to burn when playing in a swashbuckling Dortmund side.

He's also a big lad who has shown he can play with his back to goal for extended periods and act as a foil for less glamorous teammates when representing Norway.

Arteta could do with a player like him.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Virgil Van Dyke out sprinted him like he was standing in cement, he's not fast

Mbappe.

He’s ridiculous.

Sancho.

Cavani is better than Haaland or Mbappe and we need a RW to allow us to bench Greenwood and Amad.

Cavani is not better than Haaland or mbappe.

Why is rashford even in the same convo as mbappe and haaland? This isn't a school dinner article 😅

Got to laugh at the folks here falling for Mur and Culer.

comment by CurrentlyStuckIntheUK (U11181)
posted 30 minutes ago
Got to laugh at the folks here falling for Mur and Culer.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Culer is a good wum or a facking moron. Hopefully it’s the former

Definitely Mbappe. Would consider Haaland if he didn't have Raiola representing him.

Nothing for me to think about: I would chose Haaland by a mile.