or to join or start a new Discussion

73 Comments
Article Rating 2 Stars

Trippier in, Grealish out?

Apparently the leaked team shows Trippier at left back instead of Shaw or Chillwell and the bang out of form Sterling in for Grealish. Imagine dropping the most exciting English player for some time for a guy who hasn’t been good since before the pandemic.

Ah well, imagine if England finally got a good manager. You guys might actually win something 😂. I know Jose is past his best but I actually think for one or two tournaments he might be great for England.


Leaked side..

Pickford
Walker Stones Mings Trippier
Rice Phillips
Foden Mount Sterling
Kane

posted on 13/6/21

Caleta-Car with some crucial tackles already. He's the one to watch for me on the Croatia team

posted on 13/6/21

😅

posted on 13/6/21

Southgate is loyal to certain players he trusts. The Sterling decision worked out okay, though any of the pacey wide forwards that could have been picked instead of him would have caused Croatia trouble today.

I get wanting to have Trippier on the pitch for set pieces. But the loyalty to Kyle Walker was more tested - his passing was abysmal. Play Trippier on the right and Shaw or Chilwell on the left.

Also in the absence of Maguire we were very poor at shifting the ball from defence to midfield. I think having Bellingham in there could be key. Or tweaking the formation to accommodate Mount further back.

posted on 13/6/21

It’s not going to happen but I’d rather not play Kane tbh.

posted on 13/6/21

comment by meltonblue (U10617)
posted 3 minutes ago
It’s not going to happen but I’d rather not play Kane tbh.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

I was thinking that a more mobile player would have given the attack more fluidity today. Not the best situation for Kane.

posted on 13/6/21

Think it would help with that link to the midfield too. The only time the ball over midfield to the attack worked was when it was to Sterling rather than Kane, yet they kept trying the latter because he was there. It enforced the poor play.

posted on 13/6/21

At the very least he’s got to flip Sterling and Foden

posted on 13/6/21

Comment Deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 13/6/21

I just don’t think we’re getting enough benefits from Kane compared to if we had our attack set up without him.

Thought the same in 2018 too tbh.

posted on 13/6/21

I'm with you Melton. Kane is a good player, but the opposition know what to expect, and it's not difficult to counter. I hope I'm wrong though.

Sign in if you want to comment
RATE THIS ARTICLE
Rate Breakdown
5
0 Votes
4
0 Votes
3
0 Votes
2
0 Votes
1
0 Votes

Average Rating: 2 from 1 vote

ARTICLE STATS
Day
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available
Month
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available