City Offer Surprise Player To Spurs

Eyes totally dry, don't want him, never wanted him and you will not find a single post from me saying otherwise. Dry your eyes that your one decent player has seen the light and wants to move on to better things. Just not at City I hope. Happy to wait for Haaland if we can get him.

comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 3 hours, 8 minutes ago
comment by bomdia (U13941)
posted 57 seconds ago
Ridiculous amount of excitement from Spurs fans and lack of excitement from City fans. Despite their World Class striker Spurs only scored 68 goals last PL season compared to 83 for City. Admittedly 23 of those goals came from Kane whereas City only had 4 from an injured/leaving Aguero.

City can, and do score from anywhere and the fans have got to watch world class players like David Silva, Yaya and now KDB all the time. Thus adding an injury prone striker doesn't really generate too much excitement, whereas for Spurs potentially losing the source of 30% of your goals is a big issue.

If he comes I suspect City will end up paying £120m, which is at least £20m too much in my opinion.
----------------------------------------------------------------------


Kane will stay at Spurs and finish his contract off. No need for him to go to a financially doped club to try to win medals that will mean zilch.

LOL City can score goals from all areas, yet lost 1-0 at the weekend.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I noticed an entire first team out there. Oh, hold on.......

comment by bomdia (U13941)
posted 19 hours, 44 minutes ago
comment by sandy, golden boot winner fa cup 1901 (U20567)
posted 3 hours, 8 minutes ago
comment by bomdia (U13941)
posted 57 seconds ago
Ridiculous amount of excitement from Spurs fans and lack of excitement from City fans. Despite their World Class striker Spurs only scored 68 goals last PL season compared to 83 for City. Admittedly 23 of those goals came from Kane whereas City only had 4 from an injured/leaving Aguero.

City can, and do score from anywhere and the fans have got to watch world class players like David Silva, Yaya and now KDB all the time. Thus adding an injury prone striker doesn't really generate too much excitement, whereas for Spurs potentially losing the source of 30% of your goals is a big issue.

If he comes I suspect City will end up paying £120m, which is at least £20m too much in my opinion.
----------------------------------------------------------------------


Kane will stay at Spurs and finish his contract off. No need for him to go to a financially doped club to try to win medals that will mean zilch.

LOL City can score goals from all areas, yet lost 1-0 at the weekend.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I noticed an entire first team out there. Oh, hold on.......
----------------------------------------------------------------------

City had a stronger team than Leicester on the pitch, so no excuses please. Your starting XI was worth something like £400 million.

So what, the kids were in key scoring positions. Find 1 season in the last 10 years where Spurs have outscored City. Having Kane at Spurs makes no difference to your success. He is a big fish at Spurs but won't be the same at City where goals are scored for fun. Not worth a penny more than £80m to City but I suspect another £29m will be added sadly.

Edozie , Palmer and Steffan must be worth £100m each

comment by bomdia (U13941)
posted 21 minutes ago
So what, the kids were in key scoring positions. Find 1 season in the last 10 years where Spurs have outscored City. Having Kane at Spurs makes no difference to your success. He is a big fish at Spurs but won't be the same at City where goals are scored for fun. Not worth a penny more than £80m to City but I suspect another £29m will be added sadly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
20m not 29

Sterling was England's player of the tournament this summer so by Sandy's reckoning worth at least £400m on his own. Guy is seriously deluded, still banging on about £160m for Kane. Barely worth half that with his age and injury record. Don't want him, I want someone we can get 6-8 seasons out of as a regular, not someone who misses 10 games through injury every season and doesn't turn up in big games. Playing for Spurs does tend to create a losing mentality, for good reason.

comment by bomdia (U13941)
posted 22 hours, 40 minutes ago
Sterling was England's player of the tournament this summer so by Sandy's reckoning worth at least £400m on his own. Guy is seriously deluded, still banging on about £160m for Kane. Barely worth half that with his age and injury record. Don't want him, I want someone we can get 6-8 seasons out of as a regular, not someone who misses 10 games through injury every season and doesn't turn up in big games. Playing for Spurs does tend to create a losing mentality, for good reason.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

LOL don`t worry you aint getting him.

Grealish, six goals last season, £100 million.


Aguero missed half a season most season, yet you loved him.

Joe Lewis yacht - £113m.

Spurs title wins in the last 60 years - 0.

The fans loved Aguero for a thousand reasons, 93.20 not least amongst them. He was, and remains, a club legend. His injury record and age were not in his favour when it came to getting a new contract so, sadly for the fans he is gone. Still, he has won many PL and other medals, something Kane clearly never will at Spurs, which is why he is so keen to leave for a better club. As fans we would rather the club went for someone younger and with more potential.