or to join or start a new Discussion

59 Comments
Article Rating 5 Stars

The 3 non penalties

1st off hope ole makes a complaint about that cant and he doesnt ref us for a while, happy for jesse, missed the 2nd half midweek but imagine he got absolute pelters after his mistake

Now the 3 pen shouts from least obvious to blatent

1st-the pull back on ronny, seen them given but usually defenders get away with these 9/10 times but again could have been given

2nd-ronaldo going into the west ham players leg, now this is 50/50, if ref gives it then var wont overturn imo but again its tw@tkinson, the issue i have with this one is a few mins earlier a west ham defender has gone flying over pogba who moves his leg yet gets a freekick, this one the defender leaves his leg out yet nothing

3rd-most blatent one, zouma misses the ball clears out ronaldo, ref gives a gk so knows defender hasnt gt the ball yet nothing, we win the game so others wont now care but a pathetic decision by the ref and var

Next time they say we buy the refs just refer them to this game

posted on 20/9/21

“I'm aware that United missed out on two penalties. You appear to have missed my first comment on this thread openly stating that. Odd that you only piped up to dispute the suggestions that United benefitted from the ref as well as suffered him.”
———-
You do like a bit of fiction and fabrication don’t you!

“You appear to have missed my first comment” did i not reply to your first comment?



posted on 20/9/21

https://www.caughtoffside.com/2020/09/19/exclusive-keith-hackett-explains-why-martin-atkinson-made-an-error-in-awarding-crystal-palace-the-penalty-vs-man-united/
He is a cheat, simple as that!

posted on 20/9/21

comment by RED666👺. (U6562)
posted 11 minutes ago
“I'm aware that United missed out on two penalties. You appear to have missed my first comment on this thread openly stating that. Odd that you only piped up to dispute the suggestions that United benefitted from the ref as well as suffered him.”
———-
You do like a bit of fiction and fabrication don’t you!

“You appear to have missed my first comment” did i not reply to your first comment?




----------------------------------------------------------------------

Yes you did reply reply it, which makes it all the more bizarre that you accuse me of forgetting about United's penalty appeals when i had already specifically acknowledged that they should have had 2 penalties.

I haven't given any fiction or fabrication. You are the one whom, in your reply, stated that the free kick was given for offside. This was a complete fabrication that has been thoroughly disproven.

It's clear from this exchange that you took issue with the suggestion that United benefitted from any decisions this weekend (presumably due to your bias) and have jumped in to dispute something with a complete disregard to the truth. Even when actually confronted with the facts that disprove you, you refuse to accept it and twist and turn the discussion to try to derail it like some deluded trumper or flat-earther.

posted on 20/9/21

Here you go again making things up!

“Yes you did reply reply it, which makes it all the more bizarre that you accuse me of forgetting about United's penalty”

I simply said “don’t forget” not “you’ve forgotten” where was the accusation in that?

You seem to struggle to give a straight and honest answer! not reading your first post, i clearly did as i replied to it, you said i was accusing you of forgetting, when i clearly said “don’t forget”

You’re saying I’ve fabricated the offside when both the SKY commentators and the live feed which i posted said there was an offside plus the feed said the flag went up!

Are you now going to accuse me of altering the live feed text?

posted on 20/9/21

comment by RED666👺. (U6562)
posted 5 minutes ago
Here you go again making things up!

“Yes you did reply reply it, which makes it all the more bizarre that you accuse me of forgetting about United's penalty”

I simply said “don’t forget” not “you’ve forgotten” where was the accusation in that?

You seem to struggle to give a straight and honest answer! not reading your first post, i clearly did as i replied to it, you said i was accusing you of forgetting, when i clearly said “don’t forget”

You’re saying I’ve fabricated the offside when both the SKY commentators and the live feed which i posted said there was an offside plus the feed said the flag went up!

Are you now going to accuse me of altering the live feed text?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Yes and you would normally only tell someone not to forget something if you think they haven't taking it into account. I clearly and explicitly took it into account, so it's bizarre that you felt the need to make sure I didn't forget. It clearly suggests you didn't comprehend, or forgot, what you had responded to. Its perfectly likely (based on your incredibly poor logic skills in this thread) that you could reply to a comment that you haven't properly read.

If you claim that something definitively happened (like you did in your first reply outright stating, with no reference to a source, that the free kick was offside) when it was clearly and definitely not given for offside, then you are fabricating that claim or spreading misinformation. I have since completely disproven it, but you keep insisting in your misinformation which means that for all extents and purposes you are fabricating a claim because you will now be aware it was a false claim but are doubling down on it.

The free-kick was given for a foul by Soucek. Not for an offside.

posted on 20/9/21

You seem to be rambling on a bit fella!

Like i said i read your first post, couldn’t see why you would think it was a penalty due to an offside based on what i seen and heard! (With evidence posted)

You’re the one making this about Utd benefiting when surely they were the ones that came worse off with the penalty decisions on the day!


posted on 20/9/21

comment by RED666👺. (U6562)
posted 27 minutes ago
You seem to be rambling on a bit fella!

Like i said i read your first post, couldn’t see why you would think it was a penalty due to an offside based on what i seen and heard! (With evidence posted)

You’re the one making this about Utd benefiting when surely they were the ones that came worse off with the penalty decisions on the day!



----------------------------------------------------------------------

Well I thought it was a penalty based on the fact that it wasn't given as offside. Which is a fact and you have consistently denied and still not acknowledged.

I haven't made it about United benefitting. I explicitly acknowledged that they should have had 2 pens from the very start. You ignored that part and only focused on the bit you took issue to, which was the bit where United benefitted, by making a fabricated claim that I immediately refuted but you still doubled down on.

It wasn't offside, it almost certainly should have been a penalty. Ronaldo should have had two penalties. Its that simple.

posted on 20/9/21

Here you go yet again making stuff up!

“ You ignored that part and only focused on the bit you took issue to,”

How do you know i “ignored” it why would i pull you up on something i agreed on!

The evidence you posted I couldn’t access as I can’t get SKY videos an stuff in Tenerife

posted on 20/9/21

comment by RED666👺. (U6562)
posted 1 hour, 7 minutes ago
Here you go yet again making stuff up!

“ You ignored that part and only focused on the bit you took issue to,”

How do you know i “ignored” it why would i pull you up on something i agreed on!

The evidence you posted I couldn’t access as I can’t get SKY videos an stuff in Tenerife
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I'm not making stuff up. You literally said "don't forget x" when I had already explicitly acknowledged x. Your statement is therefore redundant because you know that I havent forgotten x. So the logical conclusion is that you didn't properly read my comment, or forgot what it said, or that your statement was actually a non-sequiter that added nothing to the conversation (and thus served as deflection). I'm happy to let you confirm which it was.

I also completely described the evidence posted based on the link.

This dragged out discussion stems entirely from you stating a misrepresentation to defend your team and then twisting and shuffling through various deflections to avoid having to acknowledge that you got it wrong. It's clear you aren't willing to accept it so I'm just gonna leave you to it.

posted on 20/9/21

comment by welshpoolfan (U7693)
posted 1 hour, 25 minutes ago
comment by RED666👺. (U6562)
posted 1 hour, 7 minutes ago
Here you go yet again making stuff up!

“ You ignored that part and only focused on the bit you took issue to,”

How do you know i “ignored” it why would i pull you up on something i agreed on!

The evidence you posted I couldn’t access as I can’t get SKY videos an stuff in Tenerife
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I'm not making stuff up. You literally said "don't forget x" when I had already explicitly acknowledged x. Your statement is therefore redundant because you know that I havent forgotten x. So the logical conclusion is that you didn't properly read my comment, or forgot what it said, or that your statement was actually a non-sequiter that added nothing to the conversation (and thus served as deflection). I'm happy to let you confirm which it was.

I also completely described the evidence posted based on the link.

This dragged out discussion stems entirely from you stating a misrepresentation to defend your team and then twisting and shuffling through various deflections to avoid having to acknowledge that you got it wrong. It's clear you aren't willing to accept it so I'm just gonna leave you to it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Great that you could describe something in a link that I couldn’t watch and that’s your basis for the decision!

Then you play the deflection card, sign of no where else to go i guess!

Im not to sure on your show of affection with all the X’s
But each to their own but it’s not my thing mate, hey but each to their own. 👍

Sign in if you want to comment
RATE THIS ARTICLE
Rate Breakdown
5
2 Votes
4
0 Votes
3
0 Votes
2
0 Votes
1
0 Votes

Average Rating: 5 from 2 votes

ARTICLE STATS
Day
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available
Month
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available