or to join or start a new Discussion

77 Comments
Article Rating 1.8 Stars

Lo Celso... Ndombele..

........ our creative sparks ???

How much longer can we tolerate these two and with the money we spent on these pair we could have bought someone reliable like Bruno Fernandes !!

Look at our transfer business I mean yet another year of running things on a shoestring !!

Tuchel is probably the best Manager in the PL yet we appoint Nuno who I like but he was not our first choice !!

Our Club is being run in such a poor manner !!

posted on 22/9/21

comment by Phenom (U20037)
posted 38 seconds ago
West ham and arsenal have famously done capacity on tickets sold not through the gate

----------------------------------------------------------------------
indeed so

posted on 22/9/21

comment by Phenom (U20037)
posted 51 seconds ago
Do they have standing at Brentford?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
this might be a decent answer

comment by Phenom (U20037)

posted on 22/9/21

Newcastle, Burnley and Palace all have great support so weird seeing them near the bottom there. shows strength not necessarily in numbers if true.

point scoring on attendance is proper lame though, especially as empty seats, like you say, are pretty understandable in certain comps and you also have variety of corporates and ST allocation at different clubs.

posted on 22/9/21

comment by Sheriff JW Pepper (U1007)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by Edinspur (U1109)
posted 5 minutes ago
We’ve also been at over 94% capacity for every game in the league this season as well so it’s a weird point
----------------------------------------------------------------------
so you're 15th in the league then...

https://www.footballwebpages.co.uk/premier-league/attendances/average-as-percentage

Mind you we are below that

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Spurs 66% full is still more than Chelsea 100% full

posted on 22/9/21

1. Levy bought the wrong Fernandes..just being a cheapskate again!
2. Nuno was Levy's 6th choice. Better choices refused to work under his financial restrictions!
3. NDombele is a very talented player....but can Nuno do anything with him?

posted on 22/9/21

comment by JustCallMeTed (U21528)
posted 7 minutes ago
1. Levy bought the wrong Fernandes..just being a cheapskate again!
2. Nuno was Levy's 6th choice. Better choices refused to work under his financial restrictions!
3. NDombele is a very talented player....but can Nuno do anything with him?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

1. You can’t correlate the two things because they have the same surname. We also didn’t buy Gedson.
2. Better choices also wanted to come but Paratici - who was the one who actually made the decision - preferred a defensive coach
3. Last game suggests probably

posted on 22/9/21

comment by JustCallMeTed (U21528)
posted 1 hour, 10 minutes ago
1. Levy bought the wrong Fernandes..just being a cheapskate again!
2. Nuno was Levy's 6th choice. Better choices refused to work under his financial restrictions!
3. NDombele is a very talented player....but can Nuno do anything with him?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

1. We opted for Lo Celso over Bruno - clearly a mistake. Gedson Fernandes was just a weird loan, he clearly wasn’t up to it.

2. Levy is a cuuunnt

3. Jury’s out, Christ knows the talent is there but is the application

posted on 22/9/21

comment by Devonshirespur (U6316)
posted 1 hour, 47 minutes ago
comment by Sheriff JW Pepper (U1007)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by Edinspur (U1109)
posted 5 minutes ago
We’ve also been at over 94% capacity for every game in the league this season as well so it’s a weird point
----------------------------------------------------------------------
so you're 15th in the league then...

https://www.footballwebpages.co.uk/premier-league/attendances/average-as-percentage

Mind you we are below that

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Spurs 66% full is still more than Chelsea 100% full
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's as maybe Devonshire but look at the shat they're watching

posted on 22/9/21

We weren't allowed to develop our ground it's a simple as that

posted on 23/9/21

comment by Striketeam7 (U18109)
posted 11 hours, 29 minutes ago
comment by *Redinthehead - FreeGaza - فلسطين (U1860)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Striketeam7 (U18109)
posted 3 hours, 12 minutes ago
comment by *Redinthehead - FreeGaza - فلسطين (U1860)
posted 15 minutes ago
The stadium needs paying for.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

This essentially covered each year by the 2 NFL games, Boxing, Rugby and concerts - it’s why they went with the flip pitch.

This summers issue was we took ages to get a new manager, hired one that convinced nobody and then dawdled on Kane all window
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh really ?

So how many NFL games and concerts and boxing matches have been held in the past two years?

For gods sake just think! The stadium still needs paying for!
----------------------------------------------------------------------

It’s called borrowing against future income - we have NFL games and boxing in the next month which is going to massively ease financial burdens - why couldn’t we use that in the summer with the knowledge of full fans being back as well.

Please do try to think and keep up dead in the head
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Let’s try again. Spurs have a massive stadium expense to pay for.
You claimed that each year NFL games, concerts, boxing matches and internationals hosted at Spurs stadium will pay for the stadium build costs.

So in the absence of those events due to covid, where is the money coming from?
It will need to come directly from Spurs football operations to pay the stadium debt while other events aren’t happening.

No one was denying that the stadium monies were fronted with a view to being paid back via future income.
In the absence of the extra income the stadium debt will still need to be paid.

Hence “you’ve got a stadium to pay for”

Ok ?

Sign in if you want to comment
RATE THIS ARTICLE
Rate Breakdown
5
0 Votes
4
0 Votes
3
0 Votes
2
0 Votes
1
0 Votes

Average Rating: 1.8 from 5 votes

ARTICLE STATS
Day
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available
Month
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available