Or can the club rediscover the glory that has seen them labelled a superior side to the likes of Arsenal, Manchester United, Chelsea and co over the last decade?
Harry Kane for me is the missing piece of the jigsaw. Get him back on the pitch and playing and I have no doubts Spurs performances will improve ten-fold.
It's cliche, but Nuno has barely been in the job 5 minutes yet, the man needs time to implement his ideas and style of play on the team. I have little doubt that given another transfer window or two, he'll have the chance to bring in the defenders and defensive midfielders he needs to build a solid base behind Kane up top.
And lastly, it's clear that Levy knows what he is doing. In refusing to sell Kane he's played a blinder. Harry would have been extremely happy to join Man City in the summer and a happy Kane would be bad news for Spurs when it came to games against the two. It's far better for all concerned that he's miserable and not top of the scoring charts in a blue shirt. A lacklustre Kane won't help City conquer Europe this season, which I think we can all agree is a great thing.
Dynasty over? It's only just beginning.
Is the Spurs dynasty over?
posted on 27/9/21
comment by Kroenke_out (U21076)
posted 30 minutes ago
When will Harry Kane start playing?
X was in Y's pocket.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Kane was in Kante's pocket last week
posted on 27/9/21
comment by Sheriff JW Pepper (U1007)
posted 28 minutes ago
comment by Kroenke_out (U21076)
posted 30 minutes ago
When will Harry Kane start playing?
X was in Y's pocket.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Kane was in Kante's pocket last week
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pockets on a football kit? Very strange
posted on 27/9/21
comment by Bake 'em away toys (U7303)
posted 1 hour, 10 minutes ago
comment by Sheriff JW Pepper (U1007)
posted 28 minutes ago
comment by Kroenke_out (U21076)
posted 30 minutes ago
When will Harry Kane start playing?
X was in Y's pocket.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Kane was in Kante's pocket last week
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pockets on a football kit? Very strange
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Figuratively...not so much though
posted on 28/9/21
Dynasty? What Spurs have been the last decade or so is no different to Newcastle back in the late 90s early 00s.
posted on 28/9/21
comment by Cinciwolf----Wolves poster of the millennium (U11551)
posted 13 hours, 47 minutes ago
Dynasty? What Spurs have been the last decade or so is no different to Newcastle back in the late 90s early 00s.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Erm well they've beaten Inter Milan away as well as only finishing 11 points behind Leicester in the title race. They've also been runners up in a champions league final as well as being the first English club to qualify for the conference league.
If that's ot a dynasty, what is?
posted on 28/9/21
comment by Pride of the North (U6803)
posted 33 minutes ago
comment by Cinciwolf----Wolves poster of the millennium (U11551)
posted 13 hours, 47 minutes ago
Dynasty? What Spurs have been the last decade or so is no different to Newcastle back in the late 90s early 00s.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Erm well they've beaten Inter Milan away as well as only finishing 11 points behind Leicester in the title race. They've also been runners up in a champions league final as well as being the first English club to qualify for the conference league.
If that's ot a dynasty, what is?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It definitely NOT a dynasty! Get a dictionary, words have meaning.
posted on 28/9/21
comment by Pride of the North (U6803)
posted 1 hour ago
comment by Cinciwolf----Wolves poster of the millennium (U11551)
posted 13 hours, 47 minutes ago
Dynasty? What Spurs have been the last decade or so is no different to Newcastle back in the late 90s early 00s.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Erm well they've beaten Inter Milan away as well as only finishing 11 points behind Leicester in the title race. They've also been runners up in a champions league final as well as being the first English club to qualify for the conference league.
If that's ot a dynasty, what is?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
In the span of the decade or so I mentioned Newcastle finished 2nd twice, 3rd twice, 4th, 5th and 6th.
posted on 28/9/21
comment by Cinciwolf----Wolves poster of the millennium (U11551)
posted 2 hours, 19 minutes ago
comment by Pride of the North (U6803)
posted 1 hour ago
comment by Cinciwolf----Wolves poster of the millennium (U11551)
posted 13 hours, 47 minutes ago
Dynasty? What Spurs have been the last decade or so is no different to Newcastle back in the late 90s early 00s.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Erm well they've beaten Inter Milan away as well as only finishing 11 points behind Leicester in the title race. They've also been runners up in a champions league final as well as being the first English club to qualify for the conference league.
If that's ot a dynasty, what is?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
In the span of the decade or so I mentioned Newcastle finished 2nd twice, 3rd twice, 4th, 5th and 6th.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ming was a dynasty...Newcastle had Shearer & a handful of decent players, and were buoyed by Keegan in charge for a bit...nowhere near a dynasty
posted on 28/9/21
Spurs haven't even had what Newcastle had...they got to one final in two decades (two if you count the mickey mouse they won in 08) ...& couldn't bring the bacon home
posted on 28/9/21
comment by Sheriff JW Pepper (U1007)
posted 1 hour, 14 minutes ago
comment by Cinciwolf----Wolves poster of the millennium (U11551)
posted 2 hours, 19 minutes ago
comment by Pride of the North (U6803)
posted 1 hour ago
comment by Cinciwolf----Wolves poster of the millennium (U11551)
posted 13 hours, 47 minutes ago
Dynasty? What Spurs have been the last decade or so is no different to Newcastle back in the late 90s early 00s.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Erm well they've beaten Inter Milan away as well as only finishing 11 points behind Leicester in the title race. They've also been runners up in a champions league final as well as being the first English club to qualify for the conference league.
If that's ot a dynasty, what is?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
In the span of the decade or so I mentioned Newcastle finished 2nd twice, 3rd twice, 4th, 5th and 6th.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ming was a dynasty...Newcastle had Shearer & a handful of decent players, and were buoyed by Keegan in charge for a bit...nowhere near a dynasty
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That was my point. Dynasties win things and dominate. Spurs as I said, are no different to Newcastle 20 years ago.