Fair or absurd?

comment by Bite (U3245)
posted 13 hours, 20 minutes ago
-Mr. Diaz never worked for Tesla. He was a contract employee who worked for Citistaff and nextSource.

- Mr. Diaz worked as an elevator operator at the Fremont factory for nine months, from June 2015 to March 2016.

- In addition to Mr. Diaz, three other witnesses (all non-Tesla contract employees) testified at trial that they regularly heard racial slurs (including the n-word) on the Fremont factory floor. While they all agreed that the use of the n-word was not appropriate in the workplace, they also agreed that most of the time they thought the language was used in a "friendly" manner and usually by African-American colleagues. They also told the jury about racist graffiti in the bathrooms, which was removed by our janitorial staff;

- There was no witness testimony or other evidence that anyone ever heard the n-word used toward Mr. Diaz.

- Mr. Diaz made written complaints to his non-Tesla supervisors. Those were well-documented in the nine months he worked at our factory. But he didn't make any complaints about the n-word until after he was not hired full-time by Tesla – and after he hired an attorney.

- The three times that Mr. Diaz did complain about harassment, Tesla stepped in and made sure responsive and timely action was taken by the staffing agencies: two contractors were fired and one was suspended (who had drawn a racially offensive cartoon). Mr. Diaz himself testified that he was "very satisfied" with the results of one of the investigations, and he agreed that there was follow-up on each of his complaints.

- Even though Mr. Diaz now complains about racial harassment at Fremont, at the time he said he was being harassed, he recommended to his son and daughter – while they were all living together in the same home – that they work at Tesla with him.


That's Tesla's side of things 🤔
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can u also do a summary of his side of things, in order to make this a more balanced discussion?, rather than the losing parties version of events and then make your mind up.

Comment Deleted by Site Moderator

Comment Deleted by Site Moderator

Comment Deleted by Site Moderator

Why did u get so aggressive for anyway?

Comment Deleted by Site Moderator

comment by 11th Place Is Not A Trophy (U3245)
posted 3 minutes ago
you can make it a balanced discussion by posting his side of the story?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
OK...He went to court...and won $130 million because they clearly had evidence in court, which justified his claims.

Comment Deleted by Site Moderator

comment by 11th Place Is Not A Trophy (U3245)
posted 1 minute ago
that was highlighted in the link posted in the article. so why did you ask for information you already had access to?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
because someone very nicely made a summary for the losing party, which has clearly influenced this board,so i asked for the other side of the story..from them.i cannot be bothered to do that tbh.

Comment Deleted by Site Moderator