Just naw
posted on 14/6/22
Ridiculous decision. They’re here illegally so why should they stay??
Anyway I’ll leave this here but an illegal is an illegal and they do not belong on our shores.
posted on 14/6/22
comment by Ignacio Varga (U11781)
posted 17 minutes ago
BREAKING: ECHR has stopped two more people being sent to Rwanda.
Two more have had their tickets cancelled.
We are down to one on the flight.
https://twitter.com/care4calais/status/1536813606221791232?s=21&t=dUXNm7ZplOLra2H8vrdUvw
All the racist cockroaches are crying into their Naaazi flags
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Can be sure the government will now weaponise the rulings to rail against the ECHR.
posted on 14/6/22
ours in search for 'refuge' Shouldn't be here, not needed or welcome
—-
Speak for yourself, pal. Refugees are welcome here.
posted on 14/6/22
comment by PointyBirds (U21890)
posted 46 minutes ago
ours in search for 'refuge' Shouldn't be here, not needed or welcome
—-
Speak for yourself, pal. Refugees are welcome here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Out of interest how many do you think we could handle with our current infrastructure?
Also curious to know where you live because I doubt it's in the south east...
posted on 15/6/22
comment by Luke Combs - FJB (U3979)
posted 8 hours, 54 minutes ago
comment by PointyBirds (U21890)
posted 46 minutes ago
ours in search for 'refuge' Shouldn't be here, not needed or welcome
—-
Speak for yourself, pal. Refugees are welcome here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Out of interest how many do you think we could handle with our current infrastructure?
Also curious to know where you live because I doubt it's in the south east...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You make two fair points. The first obviously in response to the insatiable demand. However, the second problem is borne from successive governments policies of concentrating all legislative, financial and cultural focus on the SE to the detriment of everywhere else. Why else would there be a need for empty gesture 'levelling up' that the idiots of North England fell for?
posted on 15/6/22
comment by Silver (U6112)
posted 6 minutes ago
comment by Luke Combs - FJB (U3979)
posted 8 hours, 54 minutes ago
comment by PointyBirds (U21890)
posted 46 minutes ago
ours in search for 'refuge' Shouldn't be here, not needed or welcome
—-
Speak for yourself, pal. Refugees are welcome here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Out of interest how many do you think we could handle with our current infrastructure?
Also curious to know where you live because I doubt it's in the south east...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You make two fair points. The first obviously in response to the insatiable demand. However, the second problem is borne from successive governments policies of concentrating all legislative, financial and cultural focus on the SE to the detriment of everywhere else. Why else would there be a need for empty gesture 'levelling up' that the idiots of North England fell for?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Let's just clarify that it's not the south east where all the money goes, it's London. So many towns down here are run down now compared to cities in the north.
posted on 15/6/22
comment by Luke Combs - FJB (U3979)
posted 9 hours, 7 minutes ago
comment by PointyBirds (U21890)
posted 46 minutes ago
ours in search for 'refuge' Shouldn't be here, not needed or welcome
—-
Speak for yourself, pal. Refugees are welcome here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Out of interest how many do you think we could handle with our current infrastructure?
Also curious to know where you live because I doubt it's in the south east...
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The question is not how many, but why has the HO been systematically defunded, rendering the asylum system completely inadequate.
People displacement (circa 100 million worldwide) is not going to magically disappear. Ignoring there is a problem (or offshoring) does nothing to address it.
As MMCC continues to make many areas uninhabitable, people displacement is only going to escalate (exponentially) in the years to come.
Investing in a fit for purpose asylum system is therefore essential. However the short-sightedness from the government is there for all to see.
In the short term those who have valid asylum claims could be given the right to work, and help address the chronic skills shortages up and down the country. Whereby they contribute to society, and are self-sufficient.
posted on 15/6/22
https://twitter.com/akellyucc/status/1536812710809198592?s=24&t=cYV5-hHentq4mBuzgGoUHg
ffs 😂
posted on 15/6/22
No person is illegal.
If you scale the UK down to the size of a football pitch, the proportion of it that is urbanised would be equivalent to the quarter circle at one of the corner flags. Britain is not "full" and there is no immigration crisis, unless you count the current labour shortage in which case the only crisis is the lack of immigrants. This is just racists being racists, and hoodwinking the ignorant into swallowing their protectionist lies. If infrastructure is creaking, it's because of lack of investment in infrastructure, not the migrants living six to a room in some Govanhill slum. If we don't have the public funds for investment in infrastructure, it's due to decades of ideologically driven economic vandalism and a national economy built around money laundering, not some Iranian policeman fleeing torture.
Migrants are not the problem, vested interests othering migrants to create a convenient bogeyman and the bootlickers who prop the whole system up are the problem.
posted on 15/6/22
WPP, your rant is full of holes.