Instead of moaning about the referee....

Spurs fans are hilarious

Okay Sandy.

Romero wasn’t a red because as has been explained constantly, hair pulling for whatever reason does not constitute violent behaviour - it should do and they should change the law, but it didn’t at the time.

Bentancur gets a nick on the ball for the first goal - have I seen them given, absolutely but just as often I’ve seen them not given, those ones go like that.

As for the off side - the rule is faaaacking stupid and creates these issues. I would be fuming if that one went in against us, but under the stupid law can see why the ref and VAR though Richarlison was not interfering. The law is awful and they should just change it back to is a player offside and forget about the interfering with play bollox

comment by Striketeam7 - the smartest person you know - Arsenal shat it on 16/01/22 - Todger (U18109)
posted 1 hour, 22 minutes ago
Romero wasn’t a red because as has been explained constantly, hair pulling for whatever reason does not constitute violent behaviour - it should do and they should change the law, but it didn’t at the time.

Bentancur gets a nick on the ball for the first goal - have I seen them given, absolutely but just as often I’ve seen them not given, those ones go like that.

As for the off side - the rule is faaaacking stupid and creates these issues. I would be fuming if that one went in against us, but under the stupid law can see why the ref and VAR though Richarlison was not interfering. The law is awful and they should just change it back to is a player offside and forget about the interfering with play bollox
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yet it was enough to get Huth a retrospective 3 match ban when he did it in a game previously?

comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 2 hours, 37 minutes ago
Strange article. Most spurs fans I’ve spoken to know you got away with one. Thoroughly outplayed by a better team. Worrying perfomance if you’re a spurs fan
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Worrying or just par for the course away at Chelsea?

I’m happy to get a point ….we never play well at Stamford bridge

Nowt worrying about it at all

I’d say spurs fans are happier than Chelsea fans with that result yet you lot are doing all the moaning

comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 2 hours, 37 minutes ago
Strange article. Most spurs fans I’ve spoken to know you got away with one. Thoroughly outplayed by a better team. Worrying perfomance if you’re a spurs fan
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Worrying or just par for the course away at Chelsea?

I’m happy to get a point ….we never play well at Stamford bridge

Nowt worrying about it at all

I’d say spurs fans are happier than Chelsea fans with that result yet you lot are doing all the moaning
----------------------------------------------------------------------
We are bringing up specific points within the game, and it's not just Chelsea fans doing that.

comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 1 hour, 27 minutes ago
comment by Striketeam7 - the smartest person you know - Arsenal shat it on 16/01/22 - Todger (U18109)
posted 1 hour, 22 minutes ago
Romero wasn’t a red because as has been explained constantly, hair pulling for whatever reason does not constitute violent behaviour - it should do and they should change the law, but it didn’t at the time.

Bentancur gets a nick on the ball for the first goal - have I seen them given, absolutely but just as often I’ve seen them not given, those ones go like that.

As for the off side - the rule is faaaacking stupid and creates these issues. I would be fuming if that one went in against us, but under the stupid law can see why the ref and VAR though Richarlison was not interfering. The law is awful and they should just change it back to is a player offside and forget about the interfering with play bollox
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yet it was enough to get Huth a retrospective 3 match ban when he did it in a game previously?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

What can I say, it’s not in the rules, it should be but it’s not and they have already come out and said there will be no further review/punishment on the Romero incident.

Some useless blazer will have faaaacked about with it somewhere like the offside rule and although it makes no sense whatsoever to anyone with half a brain cell (rules out Maf) thems the rules

comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 1 hour, 14 minutes ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 2 hours, 37 minutes ago
Strange article. Most spurs fans I’ve spoken to know you got away with one. Thoroughly outplayed by a better team. Worrying perfomance if you’re a spurs fan
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Worrying or just par for the course away at Chelsea?

I’m happy to get a point ….we never play well at Stamford bridge

Nowt worrying about it at all

I’d say spurs fans are happier than Chelsea fans with that result yet you lot are doing all the moaning
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sign of a good team getting a result despite playing poorly.

I would be more worried if I was a Chelsea fan - Havertz is not a striker and misses absolute sitters. If you don’t get a decent number 9 you won’t go far this season. Additionally, you crumbled in the last minute.

As for us, poor performance but getting a point and digging in and showing some guts were a real positive, I think that will actually benefit us

comment by Striketeam7 - the smartest person you know - Arsenal shat it on 16/01/22 - Todger (U18109)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by JFDI (U1657)
posted 1 hour, 27 minutes ago
comment by Striketeam7 - the smartest person you know - Arsenal shat it on 16/01/22 - Todger (U18109)
posted 1 hour, 22 minutes ago
Romero wasn’t a red because as has been explained constantly, hair pulling for whatever reason does not constitute violent behaviour - it should do and they should change the law, but it didn’t at the time.

Bentancur gets a nick on the ball for the first goal - have I seen them given, absolutely but just as often I’ve seen them not given, those ones go like that.

As for the off side - the rule is faaaacking stupid and creates these issues. I would be fuming if that one went in against us, but under the stupid law can see why the ref and VAR though Richarlison was not interfering. The law is awful and they should just change it back to is a player offside and forget about the interfering with play bollox
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yet it was enough to get Huth a retrospective 3 match ban when he did it in a game previously?
----------------------------------------------------------------------

What can I say, it’s not in the rules, it should be but it’s not and they have already come out and said there will be no further review/punishment on the Romero incident.

Some useless blazer will have faaaacked about with it somewhere like the offside rule and although it makes no sense whatsoever to anyone with half a brain cell (rules out Maf) thems the rules
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I understand all that, you say it's not in the rules I give an example of when it was or at least action taken, sure the matter is closed but no harm in pointing out the fact that there appears to be a lack of consistency is there?

comment by Striketeam7 - the smartest person you know - Arsenal shat it on 16/01/22 - Todger (U18109)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Blackpolespur (U9242)
posted 1 hour, 14 minutes ago
comment by Nickasaurus (U9257)
posted 2 hours, 37 minutes ago
Strange article. Most spurs fans I’ve spoken to know you got away with one. Thoroughly outplayed by a better team. Worrying perfomance if you’re a spurs fan
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Worrying or just par for the course away at Chelsea?

I’m happy to get a point ….we never play well at Stamford bridge

Nowt worrying about it at all

I’d say spurs fans are happier than Chelsea fans with that result yet you lot are doing all the moaning
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Sign of a good team getting a result despite playing poorly.

I would be more worried if I was a Chelsea fan - Havertz is not a striker and misses absolute sitters. If you don’t get a decent number 9 you won’t go far this season. Additionally, you crumbled in the last minute.

As for us, poor performance but getting a point and digging in and showing some guts were a real positive, I think that will actually benefit us
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Kane missed a sitter and hasn't scored in 4 previous games yet Havertz who has scored in the biggest of competitions to win us the biggest of trophies is deemed a concern by some spurs fans? Nah, sure we could do with a decent striker and one day we will have one but we aren't doing so bad without one.