Kilmarnock vs Celtic

Starfelt situation is simple.

He gets to win stuff.
Gets to play CL.
Gets to play beside another top CB.
Gets to play an exciting attacking style.
It's not Russia.
Gets to pump Jacynta.

comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 15 hours, 9 minutes ago
comment by Changing my name from My POV - but not decided... (U10636)
posted 1 hour, 26 minutes ago
comment by GTB, moon howling nonsense (U14017)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Changing my name from My POV - but not decided what to change it to yet (U10636)
posted 5 minutes ago
Missed most of the second half (sounds like I didn’t actually miss a lot), but what was McInnes moaning about getting a red card for Oh?!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Load of toot, dare I say trying to deflect from his teams crak performance https://twitter.com/Football_Scot/status/1647598626431029250?t=v3vjbfXPUX7TqvX17vuU9g&s=19
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cheers GTB.

That’s him bringing it up again then.

Weird how many of our opposition managers want to focus on nothing incidents (if it’s the incident I saw, it’s never a red) and not on their own and their team’s shortcomings after a defeat from us. Every time.

Don’t know if they’re trying to convince themselves, their players, their fans or their board that they’re just not good managers.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your team get a favourable decision...folk complain about it....you moan like fck about them complaining about it.

Shoes on the other foot
conspiracy, conspiracy, conspiracy

Honestly, its fcking laughable
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Just to pick up on your reply, rangers fans keep using the word ‘conspiracy’ on here, when that’s not used.

My comment was about how often when we beat a team, the opposition manager never concentrates on how poor their own team were or how good Celtic were irrespective of the result. They want to talk about one incident that they feel hasn’t gone in their favour. That’s again despite how many decisions may have gone against Celtic. Frequently, it becomes the only talking point by the MSM. Again, this is irrespective of how many ‘subjective’ decisions have gone against Celtic this season and during the same games.

There’s nothing laughable about that. For the majority of teams, 50/50 decisions happen most games and some go for and some against. McInnes started off by saying that he felt Oh should have got a red card, but then realised that didn’t help his argument about his own player and changed his mind saying he doesn’t want to see players red carded as his own player shouldn’t have been sent off previously. The only similarity is that both players had high challenges. That’s not an automatic red card. He didn’t need to bring it up and it had no bearing on the outcome. Same with a lot of other managers after we’ve beaten them.

He wasn’t asked during the interview I saw about it, he decided to bring it up himself-same as a lot of managers after we’ve beaten them.

There’s nothing laughable about my comment. It’s a fair observation. I’ve never said there’s a conspiracy. There’s a complete and utter statistical anomaly regarding decisions about rangers. Only an idiot can’t see that. The reasons why are not necessarily an agreed and planned conspiracy.

comment by Changing my name from My POV - but not decided what to change it to yet (U10636)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 15 hours, 9 minutes ago
comment by Changing my name from My POV - but not decided... (U10636)
posted 1 hour, 26 minutes ago
comment by GTB, moon howling nonsense (U14017)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Changing my name from My POV - but not decided what to change it to yet (U10636)
posted 5 minutes ago
Missed most of the second half (sounds like I didn’t actually miss a lot), but what was McInnes moaning about getting a red card for Oh?!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Load of toot, dare I say trying to deflect from his teams crak performance https://twitter.com/Football_Scot/status/1647598626431029250?t=v3vjbfXPUX7TqvX17vuU9g&s=19
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Cheers GTB.

That’s him bringing it up again then.

Weird how many of our opposition managers want to focus on nothing incidents (if it’s the incident I saw, it’s never a red) and not on their own and their team’s shortcomings after a defeat from us. Every time.

Don’t know if they’re trying to convince themselves, their players, their fans or their board that they’re just not good managers.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your team get a favourable decision...folk complain about it....you moan like fck about them complaining about it.

Shoes on the other foot
conspiracy, conspiracy, conspiracy

Honestly, its fcking laughable
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Just to pick up on your reply, rangers fans keep using the word ‘conspiracy’ on here, when that’s not used.

My comment was about how often when we beat a team, the opposition manager never concentrates on how poor their own team were or how good Celtic were irrespective of the result. They want to talk about one incident that they feel hasn’t gone in their favour. That’s again despite how many decisions may have gone against Celtic. Frequently, it becomes the only talking point by the MSM. Again, this is irrespective of how many ‘subjective’ decisions have gone against Celtic this season and during the same games.

There’s nothing laughable about that. For the majority of teams, 50/50 decisions happen most games and some go for and some against. McInnes started off by saying that he felt Oh should have got a red card, but then realised that didn’t help his argument about his own player and changed his mind saying he doesn’t want to see players red carded as his own player shouldn’t have been sent off previously. The only similarity is that both players had high challenges. That’s not an automatic red card. He didn’t need to bring it up and it had no bearing on the outcome. Same with a lot of other managers after we’ve beaten them.

He wasn’t asked during the interview I saw about it, he decided to bring it up himself-same as a lot of managers after we’ve beaten them.

There’s nothing laughable about my comment. It’s a fair observation. I’ve never said there’s a conspiracy. There’s a complete and utter statistical anomaly regarding decisions about rangers. Only an idiot can’t see that. The reasons why are not necessarily an agreed and planned conspiracy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
There is a conspiracy though!!

"Any Rangers fan thinking Rangers are hard done by the officials, has a serious mental illness."

We are not hard done by the officials
We have had some decisions go for us, and some go against us.

It happens

What we dont do, is convey we are the perennial victims for years and years
----------------------------

"Rangers have a WORLD RECORD penalty differential.
They have better penalty stats than all the greatest attacking teams in the world.

They've had about two penalties against them in the last 90 games.

They've had around ten penalties this season in the league.

They've had an opposition player sent off in every third match this season."

All of the above is just numbers.
Means fck all if you don't look at every incident and decide which ones warranted penalties or not, warranted red cards or not etc....
-----------------------------
"Not to mention at least three separate matches where Goldson has handled the ball inside his own box with no repercussions."

I believe mistakes have been made by the officials here, but not on all three occassions, once, maybe twice at best. As I said above, there will be occasions where a decision goes our way, and a clear mistake has been made....but that applies to every fcking team in the world.

You don't deduce from a small number of incidents that we are getting help from refs, for years, in terms of getting penalties awarded for us, not given against us, or red cards dished out to our opposition.

Goldson handling in the box one week and getting away with it has fck all to do with a player possibly getting sent off against us the next week...this is the kind of $hite being spouted by you here...yet the reality is each incident should be judged on its own merit...it never fcking is, its just another stat to add to the victim list
---------------------
"Rangers should be around 20 points behind Celtic"....in your opinion, because Celtic of course have not benefitted from a decision going their way, at any point this season, at all have they

"Celtic have been on the receiving end of some of the most ludicrous decisions I've ever witnessed"....and so have many others teams.

Celtic have also been on the other end of such things, but you don't talk about that do you...naw
----------------
Laughable? Don't get me started.

You've more than started with the amount of pi$h you've spouted above

comment by St3vie (U11028)
posted 1 hour, 15 minutes ago
"Any Rangers fan thinking Rangers are hard done by the officials, has a serious mental illness."

We are not hard done by the officials
We have had some decisions go for us, and some go against us.

It happens

What we dont do, is convey we are the perennial victims for years and years
----------------------------

"Rangers have a WORLD RECORD penalty differential.
They have better penalty stats than all the greatest attacking teams in the world.

They've had about two penalties against them in the last 90 games.

They've had around ten penalties this season in the league.

They've had an opposition player sent off in every third match this season."

All of the above is just numbers.
Means fck all if you don't look at every incident and decide which ones warranted penalties or not, warranted red cards or not etc....
-----------------------------
"Not to mention at least three separate matches where Goldson has handled the ball inside his own box with no repercussions."

I believe mistakes have been made by the officials here, but not on all three occassions, once, maybe twice at best. As I said above, there will be occasions where a decision goes our way, and a clear mistake has been made....but that applies to every fcking team in the world.

You don't deduce from a small number of incidents that we are getting help from refs, for years, in terms of getting penalties awarded for us, not given against us, or red cards dished out to our opposition.

Goldson handling in the box one week and getting away with it has fck all to do with a player possibly getting sent off against us the next week...this is the kind of $hite being spouted by you here...yet the reality is each incident should be judged on its own merit...it never fcking is, its just another stat to add to the victim list
---------------------
"Rangers should be around 20 points behind Celtic"....in your opinion, because Celtic of course have not benefitted from a decision going their way, at any point this season, at all have they

"Celtic have been on the receiving end of some of the most ludicrous decisions I've ever witnessed"....and so have many others teams.

Celtic have also been on the other end of such things, but you don't talk about that do you...naw
----------------
Laughable? Don't get me started.

You've more than started with the amount of pi$h you've spouted above
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Explain why Rangers have by far, the largest penalty differential in world football.

Take your time.

Wild guess, most fouls in the penalty box?

"Explain why Rangers have by far, the largest penalty differential in world football.

Take your time."

As yer man above says, possibly down to them being fouled theost in the box, and committing the fewest fouls in their own box...mental stuff like

Celtic this season:
- have scored more league goals this season than any other team in Europe
- have the most league wins than any other team in Europe
- have the best league goal difference in Europe

Please explain why that is?

Personally I'd put it down to how potent their attack is

Maybe you have a different theory.....do teams lie down to them all the time is that it, do they get the easiest run and assistance from every team in the league to help them win?

Are perfectly good goals against them getting chopped off all the time??? Pretty sure I seen that happen in a game recently

Tell you what, to post those stats with the refs against all the fcking time...some team hiy

https://mobile.twitter.com/sportbible/status/1648248789063352321

The conspiracy widens!

That Trent one last night was ridiculous why it wasn't given. Clearly pushes his elbow towards the ball and the ball is nudged perfectly into his path. I can understand the ref not seeing that but for VAR to look at it and still think it is ok is absolutely mental