Rashford

Your agenda*

comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 23 minutes ago
comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 2 hours, 58 minutes ago
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 1 hour, 27 minutes ago
Rashford is one of the reasons that ETH has decided against trying to implement that style of football, though. If he’s replaced with someone that wants to change it then Rashford still represents a big problem.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Rashford is the one player that save this job last season you melon.

Of course he's going to try and fit him in. The others didn't save his bacon last year. Marcus did.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Irrelevant to the point.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

The fact you think leaving Rashford out changes everything is where you're agenda is getting in the away.

I have seen us in the flesh a few times this year with Marcus missing and we've been just as bad. Worse even.

I'm sure he didn't start either of the 3-0 home defeats to Newcastle or Bournemouth. What happened those days? Did the replacements forget how to play that ETH way as well? 😂


----------------------------------------------------------------------

I think the problem for you guys is that you have a few players not really willing to truly work hard. Someone like Garnacho is an example of someone who puts some effort in but perhaps not enough BUT he is producing at the right end of the pitch and he's been one of your best performers this season. You forgive that sometimes he doesnt track the runners very well or press really hard because he's a constant threat up front. So even without Rashford your team/style problems persist. When Rashford does play, he isnt delivering in terms of output, his decision making is often poor, he doesnt look like he's leaving it all out there, and his body language is awful......all of which makes him look like a much bigger problem than say Garnacho, whose positives are comfortably outweighing his negatives.

comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 1 hour, 10 minutes ago
comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 2 hours, 58 minutes ago
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 1 hour, 27 minutes ago
Rashford is one of the reasons that ETH has decided against trying to implement that style of football, though. If he’s replaced with someone that wants to change it then Rashford still represents a big problem.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Rashford is the one player that save this job last season you melon.

Of course he's going to try and fit him in. The others didn't save his bacon last year. Marcus did.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Irrelevant to the point.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

The fact you think leaving Rashford out changes everything is where you're agenda is getting in the away.

I have seen us in the flesh a few times this year with Marcus missing and we've been just as bad. Worse even.

I'm sure he didn't start either of the 3-0 home defeats to Newcastle or Bournemouth. What happened those days? Did the replacements forget how to play that ETH way as well? 😂


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your ability to make a straw-man argument gets more impressive by the week.

comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 36 minutes ago
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 1 hour, 10 minutes ago
comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 2 hours, 58 minutes ago
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 1 hour, 27 minutes ago
Rashford is one of the reasons that ETH has decided against trying to implement that style of football, though. If he’s replaced with someone that wants to change it then Rashford still represents a big problem.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Rashford is the one player that save this job last season you melon.

Of course he's going to try and fit him in. The others didn't save his bacon last year. Marcus did.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Irrelevant to the point.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

The fact you think leaving Rashford out changes everything is where you're agenda is getting in the away.

I have seen us in the flesh a few times this year with Marcus missing and we've been just as bad. Worse even.

I'm sure he didn't start either of the 3-0 home defeats to Newcastle or Bournemouth. What happened those days? Did the replacements forget how to play that ETH way as well? 😂


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your ability to make a straw-man argument gets more impressive by the week.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I'd quite like to see his analysis on Ten Hags ability to not play to Rashys strength as he set the line up of tequilas tbh.

comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 41 minutes ago
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 1 hour, 10 minutes ago
comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 2 hours, 58 minutes ago
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 1 hour, 27 minutes ago
Rashford is one of the reasons that ETH has decided against trying to implement that style of football, though. If he’s replaced with someone that wants to change it then Rashford still represents a big problem.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Rashford is the one player that save this job last season you melon.

Of course he's going to try and fit him in. The others didn't save his bacon last year. Marcus did.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Irrelevant to the point.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

The fact you think leaving Rashford out changes everything is where you're agenda is getting in the away.

I have seen us in the flesh a few times this year with Marcus missing and we've been just as bad. Worse even.

I'm sure he didn't start either of the 3-0 home defeats to Newcastle or Bournemouth. What happened those days? Did the replacements forget how to play that ETH way as well? 😂


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your ability to make a straw-man argument gets more impressive by the week.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

It's not a straw man argument. It's a perfectly reasonable one.

Marcus Rashford has been left out quite a few times this season due to poor form and discipline and we've been equally crap. Nothing changes.

SE85’s defence of Rashford:

1. The rest of our attackers are as poor as him.

2. We’ve played poorly without him.

Rinse, repeat.

comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 16 minutes ago
comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 41 minutes ago
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 1 hour, 10 minutes ago
comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 2 hours, 58 minutes ago
comment by Glazers Out (SE85) (U21241)
posted 18 minutes ago
comment by Kobbie The King Mainoo (U10026)
posted 1 hour, 27 minutes ago
Rashford is one of the reasons that ETH has decided against trying to implement that style of football, though. If he’s replaced with someone that wants to change it then Rashford still represents a big problem.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Rashford is the one player that save this job last season you melon.

Of course he's going to try and fit him in. The others didn't save his bacon last year. Marcus did.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Irrelevant to the point.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

The fact you think leaving Rashford out changes everything is where you're agenda is getting in the away.

I have seen us in the flesh a few times this year with Marcus missing and we've been just as bad. Worse even.

I'm sure he didn't start either of the 3-0 home defeats to Newcastle or Bournemouth. What happened those days? Did the replacements forget how to play that ETH way as well? 😂


----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your ability to make a straw-man argument gets more impressive by the week.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

It's not a straw man argument. It's a perfectly reasonable one.

Marcus Rashford has been left out quite a few times this season due to poor form and discipline and we've been equally crap. Nothing changes.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
You should probably google what it means then.

comment by The Process (U20671)
posted 1 hour, 32 minutes ago
SE85’s defence of Rashford:

1. The rest of our attackers are as poor as him.

2. We’ve played poorly without him.

Rinse, repeat.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Or, he was amazing last season so is allowed to have a bad season and do what he wants, even though he’s had more bad seasons than good since his debut.

comment by The Process (U20671)
posted 1 hour, 54 minutes ago
SE85’s defence of Rashford:

1. The rest of our attackers are as poor as him.

2. We’ve played poorly without him.

Rinse, repeat.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

He's a moron

comment by Vengeance of Kungfu Bao Bun (#EthIn) (U23079)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by The Process (U20671)
posted 1 hour, 54 minutes ago
SE85’s defence of Rashford:

1. The rest of our attackers are as poor as him.

2. We’ve played poorly without him.

Rinse, repeat.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

He's a moron
----------------------------------------------------------------------


Well done Plumpy.