'Sport's trial of the century to begin': Premier League v Man City on 115 charges - https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/articles/c74j4z10w97o
Football VS Manchester City
The wait is almost over
So it begins..
posted 4 weeks ago
The EFA shuddagot tje italian countrrpart too do it 4 em
FIGC/Lega Calcio r v efficient in comoarisson
posted 4 weeks ago
Failure to provide accurate and up-to-date financial information from 2009/10 to and including 2017/18
- 54 charges
Failure to provide accurate financial reports for player and manager compensation from 2009/10 to and including 2017/18
- 14 charges
Failure to comply with UEFA’s regulations, including UEFA’s Club Licensing and Financial Fair Play Regulations
-5 charges
Breaches of Premier League profitability and sustainability regulations from 2015/16 to and including 2017/18
7 - charges
Failure to cooperate with Premier League investigations from December 2018 - present
35 charges
You know as times gone I’ve kinda softened my hard stance on City
They started behind atleast the top 10. Built a stunning back room organization
Hired primarily the right coach for the right phase of their project. I grew up in Withy and I can tell you what they’ve done not just for the east side, local economy
Forgetting how they turned 80 acres of disgusting abandoned brownfield crap and made it beautiful with grass, wildflower meadows, picnic areas, I swear ion the right day you’d sit out there and you’d forget you’re in Ancoats etc
Or the 6000 homes they agreed to build in east Manchester over the next ten years starting with fave 1 1.2bn quid first 1000 which is already started
The beautiful marina?!
posted 4 weeks ago
City have barely if at all out spent Chelsea United even Arsenal since he took over
They just built a great org and benefit off that
Antithesis of our methods over same time
posted 4 weeks ago
comment by Dwight K Schrute (U22590)
posted 41 minutes ago
Failure to provide accurate and up-to-date financial information from 2009/10 to and including 2017/18
- 54 charges
Failure to provide accurate financial reports for player and manager compensation from 2009/10 to and including 2017/18
- 14 charges
Failure to comply with UEFA’s regulations, including UEFA’s Club Licensing and Financial Fair Play Regulations
-5 charges
Breaches of Premier League profitability and sustainability regulations from 2015/16 to and including 2017/18
7 - charges
Failure to cooperate with Premier League investigations from December 2018 - present
35 charges
You know as times gone I’ve kinda softened my hard stance on City
They started behind atleast the top 10. Built a stunning back room organization
Hired primarily the right coach for the right phase of their project. I grew up in Withy and I can tell you what they’ve done not just for the east side, local economy
Forgetting how they turned 80 acres of disgusting abandoned brownfield crap and made it beautiful with grass, wildflower meadows, picnic areas, I swear ion the right day you’d sit out there and you’d forget you’re in Ancoats etc
Or the 6000 homes they agreed to build in east Manchester over the next ten years starting with fave 1 1.2bn quid first 1000 which is already started
The beautiful marina?!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Agree completely
posted 3 weeks, 6 days ago
The verdict will be to punish Everton further despite the fact they have nothing to do with City's hearing
posted 3 weeks, 6 days ago
comment by Dwight K Schrute (U22590)
posted 9 hours, 53 minutes ago
Failure to provide accurate and up-to-date financial information from 2009/10 to and including 2017/18
- 54 charges
Failure to provide accurate financial reports for player and manager compensation from 2009/10 to and including 2017/18
- 14 charges
Failure to comply with UEFA’s regulations, including UEFA’s Club Licensing and Financial Fair Play Regulations
-5 charges
Breaches of Premier League profitability and sustainability regulations from 2015/16 to and including 2017/18
7 - charges
Failure to cooperate with Premier League investigations from December 2018 - present
35 charges
You know as times gone I’ve kinda softened my hard stance on City
They started behind atleast the top 10. Built a stunning back room organization
Hired primarily the right coach for the right phase of their project. I grew up in Withy and I can tell you what they’ve done not just for the east side, local economy
Forgetting how they turned 80 acres of disgusting abandoned brownfield crap and made it beautiful with grass, wildflower meadows, picnic areas, I swear ion the right day you’d sit out there and you’d forget you’re in Ancoats etc
Or the 6000 homes they agreed to build in east Manchester over the next ten years starting with fave 1 1.2bn quid first 1000 which is already started
The beautiful marina?!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I never had a hard stance in the first place but if they've broken the rules everybody is bound by, whilst others followed them, they should be punished accordingly.
Agree they have done things well from a football perspective and that they started behind everyone else, however that has nothing to do with the rules they signed up to and are charged with breaking.
posted 3 weeks, 6 days ago
No I know but I guess now I’m more open to the full spectrum not just hating them blindly and blaming them for our rott lol
posted 3 weeks, 6 days ago
Arsenal fans think accusations of City breaking Rule 8 (a).3.0 in 2009 is the sole reason they haven't won the league for 25 years.
posted 2 weeks, 5 days ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 week, 3 days ago
comment by House - (U17162)
posted 17 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 5 minutes ago
Yank Cartel v Manchester City
If City don't win then it's Hello European Super League and games played overseas.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So in your view, only by City winning does the current footballing pyramid remain?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, United, Arsenal and Liverpool were the drivers behind the ESL proposals and also the drivers behind the PL charges against City who were quick to discreit it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was hardly on City's interest to embrace it.
posted 2 weeks, 5 days ago
comment by manusince52 (U9692)
posted 9 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 1 week, 3 days ago
comment by House - (U17162)
posted 17 minutes ago
comment by Boris 'Inky’ Gibson (U5901)
posted 5 minutes ago
Yank Cartel v Manchester City
If City don't win then it's Hello European Super League and games played overseas.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So in your view, only by City winning does the current footballing pyramid remain?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, United, Arsenal and Liverpool were the drivers behind the ESL proposals and also the drivers behind the PL charges against City who were quick to discreit it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was hardly on City's interest to embrace it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
City were the first, along with Chelsea, to withdraw from the ESL and publically stated they were misled over the no promotion/relegation clause.
The American owned clubs were last to withdraw and that was only because of fan pressure.