All dressed up and no one to......

comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 46 minutes ago
"I would be happy with Isak and Zubimendi."

I don't see Arsenal paying £200m for 2 players.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Neither can I which is why I said if we are serious. Our board are just there to make money

comment by montleeds (U18330)
posted 43 minutes ago
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 10 minutes ago
Best midfield 3 in the league, shiiit hot striker, decent defence and the threat of Gordon. If they can get their best xi on the pitch the barcodes will give Liverpool a very good game.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liverpool are Liverpool and Newcastle are Newcastle. Unfortunately, I only see one outcome.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes and Liverpool certainly aren't Arsenal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nope they aren't. They win PL titles every season

Would Isak leave for Arsenal, from a club reaching finals to a club not reaching finals.

From a club with impressive backing to one that's always baulked at spending big to complete the jigsaw.

comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 38 minutes ago
"I would be happy with Isak and Zubimendi."

I don't see Arsenal paying £200m for 2 players.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But that's exactly what the Kroenkes would do.

Splash £200m on two big signings to keep the fans sweet, but then rationalise the decision by shoring up the squad with middling players and loanees from across town.

Management via PR.

That's why Arsenal have never had a single "complete" squad since Stan turned up 18 years ago. Despite having the 4th highest net spend in the league over the past decade.

comment by Gillespie Road. (U18361)
posted 8 minutes ago
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 38 minutes ago
"I would be happy with Isak and Zubimendi."

I don't see Arsenal paying £200m for 2 players.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But that's exactly what the Kroenkes would do.

Splash £200m on two big signings to keep the fans sweet, but then rationalise the decision by shoring up the squad with middling players and loanees from across town.

Management via PR.

That's why Arsenal have never had a single "complete" squad since Stan turned up 18 years ago. Despite having the 4th highest net spend in the league over the past decade.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
They do spend big once i a while. Like you say they are never willing to go the extra mile and complete the team.

comment by Gillespie Road. (U18361)
posted 30 minutes ago
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 38 minutes ago
"I would be happy with Isak and Zubimendi."

I don't see Arsenal paying £200m for 2 players.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
But that's exactly what the Kroenkes would do.

Splash £200m on two big signings to keep the fans sweet, but then rationalise the decision by shoring up the squad with middling players and loanees from across town.

Management via PR.

That's why Arsenal have never had a single "complete" squad since Stan turned up 18 years ago. Despite having the 4th highest net spend in the league over the past decade.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You think Stan and Josh pick the players we signed? 🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣
If they allow us to spend £200m plus whatever the "middling" players cost that is a facking lot of money. It is up to others to choose how that is best spenf not Stan 😂😂😂😂😂

From a club with impressive backing to one that's always baulked at spending big to complete the jigsaw.
------
More nonsensical bs. Arsenal have spent far bigger than Newcastle ffs
😂😂😂😂😂😂

Bitter much?

comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 3 hours, 10 minutes ago
From a club with impressive backing to one that's always baulked at spending big to complete the jigsaw.
------
More nonsensical bs. Arsenal have spent far bigger than Newcastle ffs
😂😂😂😂😂😂
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is that at odds with what I've said? Silly boy.

I mean i can't see where i said Newcastle spend more than Arsenal only that Arsenal never buy the missing link like the top striker they needed last summer.

They've never replicated the Liverpool model of pushing the boat out for the missing links like they did with Alisson and Van Dijk. 2 seasons they've failed to do that now and that's why they are nearly men.

comment by montleeds (U18330)
posted 11 hours, 13 minutes ago
comment by Busby (U19985)
posted 11 minutes ago
comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 10 minutes ago
Best midfield 3 in the league, shiiit hot striker, decent defence and the threat of Gordon. If they can get their best xi on the pitch the barcodes will give Liverpool a very good game.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Liverpool are Liverpool and Newcastle are Newcastle. Unfortunately, I only see one outcome.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes and Liverpool certainly aren't Arsenal.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Are you banned off your own teams board?