or to join or start a new Discussion

19 Comments
Article Rating 2.25 Stars

My Apologies

I recently posted an article about transfer failure
I gave 3 reasons.
The first being not signing those 3 key goal scorers.
Some assumed that the other 2 points were 2/3 of importance
I wasn't aware I had to give percentages or fractions
Obviously those players are of paramount importance
95/100 or 95% approximately or even higher
Once again sorry for the confusion

posted 1 day ago

Going up from his stuffy basement bedroom to tell his mum that he got another person to comment on his ‘article’…oh you made new friends? I’m so proud son…want some Rice Krispies?

posted 23 hours, 26 minutes ago

comment by infiniteone (U9982)
posted 1 hour, 9 minutes ago
Going up from his stuffy basement bedroom to tell his mum that he got another person to comment on his ‘article’…oh you made new friends? I’m so proud son…want some Rice Krispies?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It's his command centre lol

posted 22 hours, 51 minutes ago

You lot’ll get in trouble with Spanish … 😂

posted 21 hours, 11 minutes ago

" The Light Brigade (U22847)

posted 1 hour, 38 minutes ago

You lot’ll get in trouble with Spanish … 😂"

Spit's busy tossing his money box searching for his long lost 25/25!..

Hope he has enough coints to do the job!.

comment by Stoopo (U4707)

posted 3 hours, 34 minutes ago

You a tell Promotion has multiple accounts. How else would he get a five star rating for this post?

posted 3 hours, 3 minutes ago

comment by Stoopo (U4707)
posted 20 minutes ago

You a tell Promotion has multiple accounts. How else would he get a five star rating for this post?

--------------

that would be me Stoops

think Promo getting bad press, not saying the way he words stuff is the best way to go about it... but,

Gruev as left back ..... so would be a defo no for me.... but, think about it, you and I both conceded he does a job what ever the role, (we literally said that the other day on a thread ref to keep him or not doing some form of job in midfield), so why not at left back as a stop gap... Bielsa would totally consider that.. I can see it an option, even if I doubt he;d be any good there..... but for some reason, every time Promo mentioned Greuv not good enough in mid field, he gets a boat load of abuse about his idea at left back.

then we've got Lighty, making a whole thread about him, I'm not even aware lighty and him have had a ding dong?, so for me, thats not "bantz".. its trying to join the masses against a not very popular poster... which is the weakest form of bullying online.

then we've got Faithy, splitting hairs about fractions with him... and I don't think LIW authorised Faithy to do this either

I'm far from perfect lads, you lot know me... but Batty felt the need to leave the site due the toxic nature of the site.. made me think a bit thats all.

we all should think on.



posted 1 hour, 53 minutes ago

The site is for people to say what they think, but it don't matter what they think because not everybody agrees with everything anyone says, but when you have 1 person pushing his/her way of thinking thread after thread onto people, than you get what we are now seeing!..

Somebody doesn't agree or thinks differently ok, but to bang it down peoples throats demanding they see it their way is out of order, these boards are not here for demanding, these boards are here to discuss and sometimes have a bit of fun!..

Some people don't understand that!..

Er, from the have to the fun I have to think about!.

posted 1 hour, 42 minutes ago

comment by The Spanish Italians - Its all coming home aga... (U21595)
posted 1 hour, 20 minutes ago
comment by Stoopo (U4707)
posted 20 minutes ago

You a tell Promotion has multiple accounts. How else would he get a five star rating for this post?

--------------

that would be me Stoops

think Promo getting bad press, not saying the way he words stuff is the best way to go about it... but,

Gruev as left back ..... so would be a defo no for me.... but, think about it, you and I both conceded he does a job what ever the role, (we literally said that the other day on a thread ref to keep him or not doing some form of job in midfield), so why not at left back as a stop gap... Bielsa would totally consider that.. I can see it an option, even if I doubt he;d be any good there..... but for some reason, every time Promo mentioned Greuv not good enough in mid field, he gets a boat load of abuse about his idea at left back.

then we've got Lighty, making a whole thread about him, I'm not even aware lighty and him have had a ding dong?, so for me, thats not "bantz".. its trying to join the masses against a not very popular poster... which is the weakest form of bullying online.

then we've got Faithy, splitting hairs about fractions with him... and I don't think LIW authorised Faithy to do this either

I'm far from perfect lads, you lot know me... but Batty felt the need to leave the site due the toxic nature of the site.. made me think a bit thats all.

we all should think on.




----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ohhh, so it’s bantz when you say it is … and not bantz when you say it isn’t. Yeahhh right.

posted 35 minutes ago

Come on lights mate… there’s a bit of a difference having a daft jibe at kebab for example about greenwood, nobody else involved… you’ve created a whole thread and invited and encouraged a thread solely to belittle one poster …

Let’s not dress it up mate !

If you’re saying you think that’s acceptable ‘banter’ then fine, like I say, I’m hardly perfect mate but I don’t think you do, you’re way bigger than that and you know it

posted 18 minutes ago

comment by infiniteone (U9982)
posted 1 day ago
Going up from his stuffy basement bedroom to tell his mum that he got another person to comment on his ‘article’…oh you made new friends? I’m so proud son…want some Rice Krispies?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
think he's more of a golden graham boy, myself ....

Sign in if you want to comment
RATE THIS ARTICLE
Rate Breakdown
5
1 Vote
4
0 Votes
3
0 Votes
2
1 Vote
1
2 Votes

Average Rating: 2.25 from 4 votes

ARTICLE STATS
Day
Article Ranking11/500
Article Views71
Average Time(mins)0.72
Total Time(mins)52.05
Month
Article Ranking161/500
Article Views506
Average Time(mins)0.53
Total Time(mins)270.8