How come Roy Hodgson can

Read the post again. The ref to Conspiracy theories was directed generally not to this specific thread, but then you already Knew that didn't you. Don't be so pedantic.

This is like saying why can Owen Coyle put out a team to beat Blackburn, but Wenger can't.

Coyle>Wenger

It's WUM logic at it's best that.

SILKY BLUE (U1878)

Where were we under Hodgson at this point last season?

Where are we under Kenny this season?

The difference is there to see. Also, Kenny hasn't come out with statements in the press undermining the players, fans and club on the whole, Roy had.

No he just undermines the whole Club and embarrasses the majority of sensible supporters by the wearing of T. shirts with unfortunate slogans which had no place on a football field. Make no mistake your Club has lost an awful lot of Sympathy, credibility and support recently and a lot of damage has been done.
I am sure, as we exchange views, your Owners are assessing the situation seriously and that there will be movements and departures within, very soon.

"No he just undermines the whole Club and embarrasses the majority of sensible supporters by the wearing of T. shirts with unfortunate slogans which had no place on a football field".

So, the club on the whole disagree with the verdict handed down by The F.A. They put out a strongly worded statement saying they disagree. The players go out wearing T shirts supporting a player they believe has been wrongly convicted of something. This is all Kenny's fault .

The thing is the club have access to the evidence put forward by all parties, the same evidence that The F.A. has seen. They have an informed, and educated, opinion on whether Suarez is in the wrong or not.

Rival fans on here claim to know what the owners are going to do next based on what they'd like to see happen. That and no evidence or facts and an over reliance of opinion.

"Make no mistake your Club has lost an awful lot of Sympathy, credibility and support recently and a lot of damage has been done".

Where was this 'sympathy' and 'support' in the first place?

comment by SILKY BLUE (U1878)
posted 4 hours, 36 minutes ago
Read the post again. The ref to Conspiracy theories was directed generally not to this specific thread, but then you already Knew that didn't you. Don't be so pedantic.

--------

So youre posting on this thread about something the thread isn't about or hasn't been referred to in this thread?!

Like an old drunk having a case of Tourette's every now and then aren't you silky? Doesn't matter which thread you're on does it?

Oh and you never do that do you. Dont make me laugh. If your club and its Lawyers and directors have had access to the Evidence. Why are they screaming out for it in writing now instead of immediately applying for a Judicial Review of the decision?

SILKY BLUE (U1878)

The club are waiting for the written report on the reasons for the panels decision, not the evidence.

Oh and you never do that do you. Dont make me laugh. If your club and its Lawyers and directors have had access to the Evidence. Why are they screaming out for it in writing now instead of immediately applying for a Judicial Review of the decision?

--------
The real question is why is it taking the FA so long to produce their written report.

This is what is holding up proceedings, in the same way your ramblings are holding up this thread from its aim of contrasting hodgsons tenure v dalglishs

Well i have not seen anyone coming forward with fresh aims.
I have never ever known a jury to come forward with reasons for its decision, nor a coroner or in fact, the FA. What makes this so different. If they are confident enough they should appeal the Decision, not the Ratio Descendi.. Or are they seriously worried about something. End of!

The FA always put forward their report.

They are taking an absolute age on this one. What could be so time consuming about a report on why they made their decision. Should be easy.