b o l l o c k s
posted on 18/1/12
Maybe we are calling Howson's bluff? Anyone think that?
posted on 18/1/12
f u ckin g joke!!! This is a new low from the club, i don't care if he has 6 months left on his contract, it's not the point, the point is he should have been given a decent contract to sign in the first place, again, another player we can't replace, good buisness some say? B ULL SHI T
posted on 18/1/12
When you let players get into the last year of their contract, your f cked
BATES DIE
posted on 18/1/12
I like that, LIW. You should add that last bit to your name.
posted on 18/1/12
Larry I will respect you so much more if you walk
posted on 18/1/12
"Larry I will respect you so much more if you walk"
Why?
Its not Graysons fault its Bates and his gimp.
But people will continue to get on Graysons back as Bates and his gimp continue to let/help our better players leave and not be replaced. It beggars belief it really does.
posted on 18/1/12
The club are saying that Howson wanted prem football at the earliest opportunity, what a load of balls. Howson would still be with us if he thought we were going up this season, and to try and blame him for knocking back contract offers is a joke. This club under Bates will sell anyone who is worth money. The replacements are not anywhere near good enough, so we just go backwards, but Bates gets the cash. Who's next Bates? Snodds, lees, White, Clayton, Macormack - thanks for charging us prem prices for substandard 2nd division football you robbing basward