but you axed him as if LFC were milan or madrid. Look at where ur at now. Better get Benitez fast. Sinking ship!
posted on 10/3/12
"should of only been temporary"
-----
Much like the existence of most ManUtd fans.
posted on 10/3/12
Comment Deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 10/3/12
RoberTncUSA
=======================
Go away..
Kenny came and improve and team Hodgson had in relegation zone.
You should get him at United you win you trophies if you trust him so much.
posted on 10/3/12
Comment Deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 10/3/12
should have kept benitez
posted on 10/3/12
wow i cant believe the responses i'm recieving. I merely brought this up and now i'm getting insulted. I should've known what i was getting into when i posted on the liverpool board gosh
posted on 10/3/12
Would Hodgson have done any worse after:
a) New owners and without all the turbulence going on behind the scenes
b) With over £100 million to spend
I don't think he would have. He was put in at the wrong time, and his signings may have been poor but hardly worse than Dalglish's.
posted on 10/3/12
hodgson would spend 100 mil better, who wouldnt!?!
posted on 10/3/12
What a fail of an article.
posted on 10/3/12
"HODGSON WOULD HAVE LIVERPOOL IN TOP 4 NOW"
---------------
Yeah, in a parallel universe where the bottom 4 is the new top 4