or to join or start a new Discussion

15 Comments
Article Rating 2 Stars

HODGSON WOULD HAVE LIVERPOOL IN TOP 4 NOW

but you axed him as if LFC were milan or madrid. Look at where ur at now. Better get Benitez fast. Sinking ship!

posted on 10/3/12

"should of only been temporary"

-----

Much like the existence of most ManUtd fans.

posted on 10/3/12

Comment Deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 10/3/12

RoberTncUSA
=======================
Go away..
Kenny came and improve and team Hodgson had in relegation zone.

You should get him at United you win you trophies if you trust him so much.

posted on 10/3/12

Comment Deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 10/3/12

should have kept benitez

posted on 10/3/12

wow i cant believe the responses i'm recieving. I merely brought this up and now i'm getting insulted. I should've known what i was getting into when i posted on the liverpool board gosh

comment by Spurtle (U1608)

posted on 10/3/12

Would Hodgson have done any worse after:

a) New owners and without all the turbulence going on behind the scenes

b) With over £100 million to spend

I don't think he would have. He was put in at the wrong time, and his signings may have been poor but hardly worse than Dalglish's.

posted on 10/3/12

hodgson would spend 100 mil better, who wouldnt!?!

posted on 10/3/12

What a fail of an article.

posted on 10/3/12

"HODGSON WOULD HAVE LIVERPOOL IN TOP 4 NOW"

---------------

Yeah, in a parallel universe where the bottom 4 is the new top 4

Sign in if you want to comment
RATE THIS ARTICLE
Rate Breakdown
5
0 Votes
4
0 Votes
3
0 Votes
2
0 Votes
1
0 Votes

Average Rating: 2 from 8 votes

ARTICLE STATS
Day
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available
Month
Article RankingNot Ranked
Article ViewsNot Available
Average Time(mins)Not Available
Total Time(mins)Not Available