Probably stems from wearing a shirt/suit that when I’m not having to wear a suit I don’t want to wear another similar shirt in a polo shirt to a work shirt

But yeh t-shirts and jeans and Nike trainers

I don’t think I’ve worn Jeans yet though for 4 months in this lockdown, only joggers apart from cotswolds at the weekend where I wore suit trousers

Have worn 3/4 lengths tho Lol

Went for a curry tonight was fackin delicious

Hypothetically if you had £1000 free to give away would you give £100 to 10 small local businesses or £200 to 5 small local businesses? Like is £100 a bit to small and better to just do 5? (Anonymous envelope obviously, don’t want no thanks etc)

What times the city announcement tomorrow or do UEFA have to wait until the bank opens so they can get their bribe and hush hush money

They’ll either get it halved to a year or the same ban but suspended

9:30am apparently Oscar

I think they’ll get a one year ban in my opinion

It’ll be like we understand city’s defense etc but the evidence is to much and to solid however in light of the defense and the way records were obtained the ban will be reduced to one year

I’d be very surprised if it was totally eradicated

I only wear Chelsea shirts

No bottoms

UEFA's secondary accusation was that City did not comply with the investigation

I think that might hold up

How was the evidence obtained?

Math and google

Seems solid. Don't see how the evidence is obtained should play any role in their punishment. If it shows any wrong doings then they should receive the full punishment. Deal with the one who obtained the evidence separately.

But I'm no lawyer

I also don't care. But

if it gets us into CL then throw the book at them

comment by Icarium (U1097)
posted 12 minutes ago
Seems solid. Don't see how the evidence is obtained should play any role in their punishment. If it shows any wrong doings then they should receive the full punishment. Deal with the one who obtained the evidence separately.

But I'm no lawyer
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This main issue with the evidence being obtained indirectly through leaks sites is the potential for doctoring the evidence

Did City cooperate immediately allowing investigators to corroborate the evidence with City’s records? If they did and it was all confirmed then I dont think it should matter. If they didn't then they're obviously hiding something. Send em down to league 2 with Tottenham.

comment by Icarium (U1097)
posted 39 minutes ago
Did City cooperate immediately allowing investigators to corroborate the evidence with City’s records? If they did and it was all confirmed then I dont think it should matter. If they didn't then they're obviously hiding something. Send em down to league 2 with Tottenham.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the question

Interested to see the cliff notes on what CAS think of the dispute

Lockdown 2 sucks

Bet you're jealous of our freedom

I'm jealous of his lockdown