or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 44 comments are related to an article called:

Well said

Page 1 of 2

posted on 26/4/12

It's the SFA's fault.

posted on 26/4/12

Incitement surely?



Like I said before, everyone, including Hannah needs to clam down.

posted on 26/4/12

Irvine - not sure I agree but your entitled to your opinion

Davie

comment by NNH (U10730)

posted on 26/4/12

posted on 26/4/12

Thanks for that Nnh, great input

comment by NNH (U10730)

posted on 26/4/12

Thanks

posted on 26/4/12

Night out thread that way>>>>>

comment by Ghod#18 (U9390)

posted on 26/4/12

Roger Hannah

posted on 26/4/12

This the same Roger Hannah who said on Clyde that Crai Whyte paid Google to have all negative stories about him removed from the internet, stopping them from reporting on it.

Too funny

comment by Jinky (U2398)

posted on 26/4/12

This whole thing is getting out of hand, but question didn't all club agree to keep the pannels names quiet.....I wonder why that was hence the abuse they are getting now.

Also I know we are no angels when refs get the same abuse when they give something big against us.

This is the horrible society we live in, there are many factors here, 1 could Coisty of waited to see if they don't win the appeal before shooting his mouth off. Like I have said to Daviecooper1 I expect Rangers will win the appeal.

But the bigger picture not once have I ever heard the name Murray getting a backlash from Rangers fans, as yes you can blame the SFA, Whyte, but Murray has alot of questions to answer ?.

Il be very honest here if Rangers are demoted to the 3rd divison, can you honestly see good player wanting to sign for the club, the bigger picture here is your out of europe next seaon and if demoted to divison 3 could be out of europe for another 3 on top, so why would anyone apart from players in there youth want to sign for you.

My two pals said last night that if Rangers start again its going to take them years before they are competeing at the top level of scottish football again, and I have to agree.

posted on 26/4/12

Yes ghod, he makes some good points.

'It’s NOT good enough to preach openness with one breath then demand secrecy with the next.'

That one in particular

posted on 26/4/12

Rnr - the very one

comment by Ghod#18 (U9390)

posted on 26/4/12

Roger Hannah is just one of millions hurting

Him, his boss and his apprentice

posted on 26/4/12

Jinky - I want us to go to div 3. Your right , no good players will want to come to div 3, no doubt

posted on 26/4/12

Ghod - is he a bear?

Any comment in the points he makes or you just going to post 'he's hurting'?

posted on 26/4/12

Roger Hannah is just one of millions hurting

Him, his boss and his apprentice

_____

Exactly

comment by Ghod#18 (U9390)

posted on 26/4/12

his boss is Ian King
his apprentice is Robert Grieve

the hurt is massive honeslty my mate works with them

posted on 26/4/12

Ok, presume he is just a hurting bear, do you not think he's right in what he says regards

'It’s NOT good enough to preach openness with one breath then demand secrecy with the next.'

comment by Jinky (U2398)

posted on 26/4/12

Ibrox

I have never liked the SFA and over my lifetime they are a bunch of fuds that think they know best for our game.

Now going back a couple of years Celtic fans were conviced the SFA was Rangers SFA and we got slated for being paranioa, now I still think they are utter shambles but they give something against Rangers and all hell breaks lose, would we be forgivin to thinking bears are the ones parnoid now.

Rangers are not happy as this could damage the clubs future in the game, but is this the SFA fault Rangers are in the mess they are in now, no Rangers fan was moaning when you romped the SPL in the 90s splashing the cash, now beacuse Rangers are on the verdge of going out of business its everyone ellse fault but there own.

comment by Ghod#18 (U9390)

posted on 26/4/12

McCoist new who the people were he had no need to go out and say these things

posted on 26/4/12

I still dont see why the names of the panel were that important? surely the procedure they followed and the policy they used were all that was needed, naming the guys serves no purpose other than to stir up the wallopers, transparancy does not have to include names etc if the rest of the procedure is open to all

comment by NNH (U10730)

posted on 26/4/12

"What's happening to them is their problem, although i can't say i'm not enjoying it"

Remember those words Ally? I would say Karma but more chance of Korma for you

posted on 26/4/12

no Rangers fan was moaning when you romped the SPL in the 90s splashing the cash, now beacuse Rangers are on the verdge of going out of business its everyone ellse fault but there own.
______________________________

Celtics were sold because their dire financial mismanagement.

Rangers ended up in dire financial mismanagement because they were sold.

Quite different.

posted on 26/4/12

Jinky - When you say rangers are blaming everyone but themselves, what/who do you mean?

Ghod - if it was transparent, as regan keeps dating then McCoist wouldn't have had to say anything. Do you honestly think it wouldn't have came out anyway? The sfa were washing thier hands of it and saying it was the panel. Of course there would still be questions asked who was on the panel, rightly so

posted on 26/4/12

*saying

Dating

Page 1 of 2

Sign in if you want to comment