The shame of liquidation has confused many a bears tiny mind
If the club has no history then I guess they won't be punished by the SFA for anything the old club did. No ban on certain songs either.
The bit I can't get my head around is if I borrow 27M to buy a football club the club then owes the lender 27M.
Can anyone prove me wrong that Rangers keep their
history with Facts.
The company was the club, and owned everything from the stadium right down to Ally's account with Greggs. The 'club' didn't exist outside it
But good luck with the new club.
The club existed before the company and exists after it.
Oh that's right, we'll soon hear about 1899 and all that. But were Rangers liquidated in 1899, as they soon will be in 2012? if not, then its a poor comparison.
The football authorities take the view that Rangers are very much the same club as before. Punishable for previous transgressions. Like it or not.
They don't get the liqudation part
The company was NOT the club! The company owned the club. HMRC,BDO and duff and duffer say the club continues with history. Now its up to you to disprove what they are saying. And remember you can't just say delusonal that just like saying you haven't a clue.
The Rangers FC is a new club distinct from Rangers FC mate. RFC has died with its own history because they were living beyond their means, a form of cheating. If they had lived within their means they most probably would not have won as much silverware as they did, so to link the two companies' histories and try to perpetuate some kind of continuity will be yet again some kind of cheating. TRFC have to start their own history and are simply taking advantage of the void, assets, goodwill and fans left by the demise of RFC. Just accept it and live with it.
So the present Rangers shouldn't be punished for anything done in the past as you say it's a differenct club?
RFC have been liquidated..thats why it's now called TRFC!!Thats why you had to change the name!I wish people would stop comparin' this to what happened to Leeds,as their is no comparsion..
The Rangers FC are not the club they are the business!
I can live with that.
So the 'club' had no assets, no contracts, nothing tangible, nothing at all in fact. What was it? A brand? A logo? A virtual club? Turn it up. Attempts by RFC fans to try and brush off the implications of being liquidated, the process for which has now started, is laughable.
I think the Rangers fans and the football authorities "get" the liquidation part.
Not sure Mr Harper does though.
Hampden...The RST are planning to boycott games as the club went into liquidation.
If the Newco is soooo rosey,why did miller get chased away,as he was going to do what actual is happenin' now liquidation
Anone care to answer Blue Heavens question?
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Just for you Hampden, have you got any FACTS like
a quote from anyone with any clout in football or business terms?
Blue Heaven
"So the present Rangers shouldn't be punished for anything done in the past as you say it's a differenct club?"
----------------------------------------------
What part of "LIQUIDATED" don't you get mate? RFC has CEASED to exist, and TRFC is a completely new company. If you go to the offices of the Registrar of Companies at Companies House in Edinburgh Dorothy Blair will tell you that TRFC started business in 2012, not 1872.
That doesn't answer my question.
I got what I wanted Liquidation
Pyoor Bill Miller
Haha asking for facts from Celtc fans.
You just don't get ot do you?
Sign in if you want to comment
Newco?
Page 1 of 6
6
posted on 17/6/12
Delusional.
posted on 17/6/12
The shame of liquidation has confused many a bears tiny mind
posted on 17/6/12
If the club has no history then I guess they won't be punished by the SFA for anything the old club did. No ban on certain songs either.
The bit I can't get my head around is if I borrow 27M to buy a football club the club then owes the lender 27M.
posted on 17/6/12
Can anyone prove me wrong that Rangers keep their
history with Facts.
posted on 17/6/12
The company was the club, and owned everything from the stadium right down to Ally's account with Greggs. The 'club' didn't exist outside it
But good luck with the new club.
posted on 17/6/12
Hampden
posted on 17/6/12
The club existed before the company and exists after it.
posted on 17/6/12
Oh that's right, we'll soon hear about 1899 and all that. But were Rangers liquidated in 1899, as they soon will be in 2012? if not, then its a poor comparison.
posted on 17/6/12
The football authorities take the view that Rangers are very much the same club as before. Punishable for previous transgressions. Like it or not.
posted on 17/6/12
They don't get the liqudation part
posted on 17/6/12
The company was NOT the club! The company owned the club. HMRC,BDO and duff and duffer say the club continues with history. Now its up to you to disprove what they are saying. And remember you can't just say delusonal that just like saying you haven't a clue.
posted on 17/6/12
The Rangers FC is a new club distinct from Rangers FC mate. RFC has died with its own history because they were living beyond their means, a form of cheating. If they had lived within their means they most probably would not have won as much silverware as they did, so to link the two companies' histories and try to perpetuate some kind of continuity will be yet again some kind of cheating. TRFC have to start their own history and are simply taking advantage of the void, assets, goodwill and fans left by the demise of RFC. Just accept it and live with it.
posted on 17/6/12
So the present Rangers shouldn't be punished for anything done in the past as you say it's a differenct club?
posted on 17/6/12
RFC have been liquidated..thats why it's now called TRFC!!Thats why you had to change the name!I wish people would stop comparin' this to what happened to Leeds,as their is no comparsion..
posted on 17/6/12
The Rangers FC are not the club they are the business!
I can live with that.
posted on 17/6/12
So the 'club' had no assets, no contracts, nothing tangible, nothing at all in fact. What was it? A brand? A logo? A virtual club? Turn it up. Attempts by RFC fans to try and brush off the implications of being liquidated, the process for which has now started, is laughable.
posted on 17/6/12
I think the Rangers fans and the football authorities "get" the liquidation part.
Not sure Mr Harper does though.
posted on 17/6/12
Hampden...The RST are planning to boycott games as the club went into liquidation.
If the Newco is soooo rosey,why did miller get chased away,as he was going to do what actual is happenin' now liquidation
posted on 17/6/12
Anone care to answer Blue Heavens question?
posted on 17/6/12
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 17/6/12
Just for you Hampden, have you got any FACTS like
a quote from anyone with any clout in football or business terms?
posted on 17/6/12
Blue Heaven
"So the present Rangers shouldn't be punished for anything done in the past as you say it's a differenct club?"
----------------------------------------------
What part of "LIQUIDATED" don't you get mate? RFC has CEASED to exist, and TRFC is a completely new company. If you go to the offices of the Registrar of Companies at Companies House in Edinburgh Dorothy Blair will tell you that TRFC started business in 2012, not 1872.
posted on 17/6/12
That doesn't answer my question.
posted on 17/6/12
I got what I wanted Liquidation
Pyoor Bill Miller
posted on 17/6/12
Haha asking for facts from Celtc fans.
You just don't get ot do you?
Page 1 of 6
6