no, proves they are thinking of us rather then themselves
It's a loaded question.
Have you stopped beating your wife/girlfriend?
Question does the fact your club made money sponsoring the anniversary of a major tragedy in the clubs history embarrass you? It should, it really should!
Question, do you concider selling the club to a bunch of faceless shareholders, removing the words football club from the shirts in the process selling out? Manchester city football club not plc!
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Cityblueloz (U6305)
The thing is about your supporters,if your not calling us Rags,then you call us Munichs.
The thing about your supporters is they sing about hilsborough so what's your point, I asked you whether you were embarrassed by your club cynically making money selling sponsorship to a tragedy!
As for calling you rags aww diddums
Answer the above question are you embarrassed about the aforementioned matter!
Let me simplfy this so the child and the in-bred, you decide who is who understands
Etihad translated to english from ARABIC means Unity, Union
United in ARABIC means (motahed)....
ignore my comment, the etihad thread got pulled so i couldnt post and i thought this was it
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Cityblueloz (U6305)
------------
Are you not a little embarrassed you've mentioned this every day since you found out about it 3 or 4 days ago? It wasn't sold as a sponsorship for the tragedy it had our shirt sponsors at the time logo on it. Not something I agree with really but if they helped pay for the memorial and the 70 thousand odd scarves it's not surprising the club done it
It's still an embarrassment as well as an affront to common decency and the actions of a morally bankrupt club, every time a rag comes on hear all superior talking silt I will be here to remind you just what sort of club man u is!
Also this question went unanswered
Question, do you concider selling the club to a bunch of faceless shareholders, removing the words football club from the shirts in the process selling out? Manchester city football club not plc!
Not something I agree with really but if they helped pay for the memorial and the 70 thousand odd scarves it's not surprising the club done it, what they had to sponsor it to pay for a souvenir for all the match going fans, wow that makes it ok then, given what happened why didn't the club pay for those things? Why sponsor it to pay for souvenir scarves for day tripping fans, didn't I read about man u fans selling them on eBay afterwards before they were removed because of complaints, you couldn't make it up!
Disgusting!
I find it very amusing. The longer utd continue to under-estimate us the better. Last season Played 3 won 1 lost 1 drew 1 for 2 against 2. doesn't seem much between the teams to me.
ANOTHER OUT OF TOWN RED!! FROM LONDON
hahahahahahahahahahahahaha
Is it any worse making the club a PLC than letting somebody with a pot full of money and no clue about football run your club?
Through being a PLC United created a dynasty the likes of which will never be matched in the Premier League and became the brand all football clubs wish they could be.
Is it selling out? Yes it is. Was it good for the club? Yes it was. Do I as a fan believe the club cares about me as much as I care about the club? Not a chance
comment by Thunderkiss_65 (U2407)
posted 1 minute ago
Is it any worse making the club a PLC than letting somebody with a pot full of money and no clue about football run your club?
Through being a PLC United created a dynasty the likes of which will never be matched in the Premier League and became the brand all football clubs wish they could be.
Is it selling out? Yes it is. Was it good for the club? Yes it was. Do I as a fan believe the club cares about me as much as I care about the club? Not a chance
--------------------------------------------
Hmm racking up untold debt in the process which is against the club?
Is it any worse making the club a PLC than letting somebody with a pot full of money and no clue about football run your club?
Give me some examples? he had to bridge the gap very quickly to get where we are with big transfer funds, DO NOT say you haven't vastly spent over the years!!
actually the guy with the pot of money doesnt run the club he is the owner but has appointed a chairman who has done a sterling job, 2nd best chairman we have ever had in my opinion.
but the owner i mean what is he doing? redeveloping east manchester, securing new jobs for the countries rising unemployment stat, new revenue so we can be self sufficient, redeveloping our youth system so we have the best talent.
yeah what an anti-christ he is!!
tell me what have the saintly glazers done for the trafford community?
He still didn't answer the first question, is he embarrassed by the actions of his club?
if you question them, they run off
Plastic pathetic sell outs, they like their club disgust me, that's why they are the most hated fans in the country!
It has only ever amused, never upset me. Afterall there`s only one thing worse than being talked about.....
Cockney ragmong
We revel in the noisy neighbour tag,every time baconface mentions us you can see how we get right under his skin.I'm personally pleased he's carrying on as manager because I want us to take over yoonited on his watch and it's coming very soon.City are the only club in the top 6 who have improved year on year over the last 6 years or so and are right on your tails now.I also want Ratboy to be commentating when we take the title off you so the world can hear the seething bitterness in his horrible voice.
The city is red you may argue?Not on Bank holidays when it's spitting and the open top "embarrassment " was in full swing crawling down Deansgate like a UKIP rally.
Biggest club in the world?
You won't even be the biggest club in the city who's name you cling to like a slug on a window,bankruptcy and destitution awaits
comment by BlueBon - Everyday I'm Poznan-ing (U8643)
--------------
The club had no debt when it was a PLC, now the Glazers bought it it has debts against it. It's not like these debts have crippled the club, United have won 4 of the last 5 titles after all. United carry on winning, the Glazers never pay any tax on profit as they're always in the red.
Owning Man United is about earning money, buying out City was just a publicity stunt to raise the profile of Abu Dhabi.
comment by Cityblueloz (U6305)
---------------
Not embarrassed by the clubs actions at all, little old me raging against a little AIG in the corner of a poster from 3 years ago won't accomplish much.
Not run off anywhere, just have work to do sometimes
Paulpowersleftfoot (U1037)
Paul Power left foot it for Everton in 1986/87 season to be a League Title winner.Could not achieve that at his beloved Manchester City.Why? Or am i upsetting your sensibilities.
Sign in if you want to comment
Noisy Neighbours
Page 1 of 3
posted on 13/7/11
no, proves they are thinking of us rather then themselves
posted on 13/7/11
It's a loaded question.
Have you stopped beating your wife/girlfriend?
posted on 13/7/11
Question does the fact your club made money sponsoring the anniversary of a major tragedy in the clubs history embarrass you? It should, it really should!
posted on 13/7/11
Question, do you concider selling the club to a bunch of faceless shareholders, removing the words football club from the shirts in the process selling out? Manchester city football club not plc!
posted on 13/7/11
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 13/7/11
Cityblueloz (U6305)
The thing is about your supporters,if your not calling us Rags,then you call us Munichs.
posted on 13/7/11
The thing about your supporters is they sing about hilsborough so what's your point, I asked you whether you were embarrassed by your club cynically making money selling sponsorship to a tragedy!
As for calling you rags aww diddums
Answer the above question are you embarrassed about the aforementioned matter!
posted on 13/7/11
Let me simplfy this so the child and the in-bred, you decide who is who understands
Etihad translated to english from ARABIC means Unity, Union
United in ARABIC means (motahed)....
posted on 13/7/11
ignore my comment, the etihad thread got pulled so i couldnt post and i thought this was it
posted on 13/7/11
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 13/7/11
comment by Cityblueloz (U6305)
------------
Are you not a little embarrassed you've mentioned this every day since you found out about it 3 or 4 days ago? It wasn't sold as a sponsorship for the tragedy it had our shirt sponsors at the time logo on it. Not something I agree with really but if they helped pay for the memorial and the 70 thousand odd scarves it's not surprising the club done it
posted on 13/7/11
From the nostromo
posted on 13/7/11
It's still an embarrassment as well as an affront to common decency and the actions of a morally bankrupt club, every time a rag comes on hear all superior talking silt I will be here to remind you just what sort of club man u is!
Also this question went unanswered
Question, do you concider selling the club to a bunch of faceless shareholders, removing the words football club from the shirts in the process selling out? Manchester city football club not plc!
posted on 13/7/11
Not something I agree with really but if they helped pay for the memorial and the 70 thousand odd scarves it's not surprising the club done it, what they had to sponsor it to pay for a souvenir for all the match going fans, wow that makes it ok then, given what happened why didn't the club pay for those things? Why sponsor it to pay for souvenir scarves for day tripping fans, didn't I read about man u fans selling them on eBay afterwards before they were removed because of complaints, you couldn't make it up!
Disgusting!
posted on 13/7/11
I find it very amusing. The longer utd continue to under-estimate us the better. Last season Played 3 won 1 lost 1 drew 1 for 2 against 2. doesn't seem much between the teams to me.
posted on 13/7/11
ANOTHER OUT OF TOWN RED!! FROM LONDON
hahahahahahahahahahahahaha
posted on 13/7/11
Is it any worse making the club a PLC than letting somebody with a pot full of money and no clue about football run your club?
Through being a PLC United created a dynasty the likes of which will never be matched in the Premier League and became the brand all football clubs wish they could be.
Is it selling out? Yes it is. Was it good for the club? Yes it was. Do I as a fan believe the club cares about me as much as I care about the club? Not a chance
posted on 13/7/11
comment by Thunderkiss_65 (U2407)
posted 1 minute ago
Is it any worse making the club a PLC than letting somebody with a pot full of money and no clue about football run your club?
Through being a PLC United created a dynasty the likes of which will never be matched in the Premier League and became the brand all football clubs wish they could be.
Is it selling out? Yes it is. Was it good for the club? Yes it was. Do I as a fan believe the club cares about me as much as I care about the club? Not a chance
--------------------------------------------
Hmm racking up untold debt in the process which is against the club?
Is it any worse making the club a PLC than letting somebody with a pot full of money and no clue about football run your club?
Give me some examples? he had to bridge the gap very quickly to get where we are with big transfer funds, DO NOT say you haven't vastly spent over the years!!
actually the guy with the pot of money doesnt run the club he is the owner but has appointed a chairman who has done a sterling job, 2nd best chairman we have ever had in my opinion.
but the owner i mean what is he doing? redeveloping east manchester, securing new jobs for the countries rising unemployment stat, new revenue so we can be self sufficient, redeveloping our youth system so we have the best talent.
yeah what an anti-christ he is!!
tell me what have the saintly glazers done for the trafford community?
posted on 13/7/11
He still didn't answer the first question, is he embarrassed by the actions of his club?
posted on 13/7/11
if you question them, they run off
posted on 13/7/11
Plastic pathetic sell outs, they like their club disgust me, that's why they are the most hated fans in the country!
posted on 13/7/11
It has only ever amused, never upset me. Afterall there`s only one thing worse than being talked about.....
posted on 13/7/11
Cockney ragmong
We revel in the noisy neighbour tag,every time baconface mentions us you can see how we get right under his skin.I'm personally pleased he's carrying on as manager because I want us to take over yoonited on his watch and it's coming very soon.City are the only club in the top 6 who have improved year on year over the last 6 years or so and are right on your tails now.I also want Ratboy to be commentating when we take the title off you so the world can hear the seething bitterness in his horrible voice.
The city is red you may argue?Not on Bank holidays when it's spitting and the open top "embarrassment " was in full swing crawling down Deansgate like a UKIP rally.
Biggest club in the world?
You won't even be the biggest club in the city who's name you cling to like a slug on a window,bankruptcy and destitution awaits
posted on 13/7/11
comment by BlueBon - Everyday I'm Poznan-ing (U8643)
--------------
The club had no debt when it was a PLC, now the Glazers bought it it has debts against it. It's not like these debts have crippled the club, United have won 4 of the last 5 titles after all. United carry on winning, the Glazers never pay any tax on profit as they're always in the red.
Owning Man United is about earning money, buying out City was just a publicity stunt to raise the profile of Abu Dhabi.
comment by Cityblueloz (U6305)
---------------
Not embarrassed by the clubs actions at all, little old me raging against a little AIG in the corner of a poster from 3 years ago won't accomplish much.
Not run off anywhere, just have work to do sometimes
posted on 13/7/11
Paulpowersleftfoot (U1037)
Paul Power left foot it for Everton in 1986/87 season to be a League Title winner.Could not achieve that at his beloved Manchester City.Why? Or am i upsetting your sensibilities.
Page 1 of 3