or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 11 comments are related to an article called:

Would you rather have him or Giroud?

Page 1 of 1

posted on 3/9/12

Arbroath

posted on 3/9/12

He's a good player. I've always thought he was one of the most underrated in this league.

Spurs, Liverpool and Arsenal are all in need of some depth in the striking department. He would have been a good squad player for any of them.

Bit pricey though, must say.

posted on 3/9/12

Activity on the Arbroath board.

posted on 3/9/12

i can post on this because its on the arbroath page!!

posted on 3/9/12

NOT ANY MORE!!!

posted on 3/9/12

Bye Dunc...

posted on 3/9/12

Fletcher isn't Arsenal quality, he is a good player for a mid table side he gets his fair share of goals but he wouldn't be able to make the step up. Imagine starting with him in the CL, Giroud has far more quality than Fletcher.

comment by Tu mEze (U3732)

posted on 3/9/12

Did you see his finish the other day Superb.

But for a back up he sure is overpriced.

posted on 3/9/12

You know this really hacks me off.

Why is he not Arsenal quality? Is it because of:

1. His name
2. His nationality
3. His backround
4. He has experiance in the PL

Because his overall ability is certainly good enough!

posted on 3/9/12

Giroud is better as he will prove. Cheaper as well.

comment by Tu mEze (U3732)

posted on 3/9/12

You know this really hacks me off.

Why is he not Arsenal quality? Is it because of:

1. His name
2. His nationality
3. His backround
4. He has experiance in the PL

Because his overall ability is certainly good enough!

===

Because he's just a goalscorer. At the top of a 4-3-3 he'd struggle. Simple, really.

Page 1 of 1

Sign in if you want to comment