or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 85 comments are related to an article called:

Mata vs Cazorla

Page 2 of 4

posted on 30/9/12

Mata s the best creative midfielder in the league

posted on 30/9/12

also, mata was ou 2nd option last season until you stole him from us, we tried to sign cazorla first then he went to malaga, he was our 2nd option, behind cazorla.

posted on 30/9/12

Chelsea deserved the win but yesterday showed Cazorla is miles better than Mata. I'll tell you why.

Mata probably had his best game for chelsea and all he did was deliver two semi-decent free kicks which we should have cleared. From open play he was anonymous.

Cazorla had his most ineffective game but still he was decent from open play and looked dangerous throughout the match. Hardly a 'poor' game from him.

Cazorla >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mata.

===================

Blind fan

posted on 30/9/12

Mata played the most games at the club last year then went to the Euros and the olympics. He had no rest whatsoever. He's finally got a rest and has arguably been motm the past 3 games

posted on 30/9/12

Mata was brill yesterday

posted on 30/9/12

Mata - 2 goals and 2 assists in 2 games against Arsenal

New Drogba

posted on 30/9/12

Just read up the stats which back up my argument. Cazorla 95 % pass accuracy and 4 key passes.

Mata 92% pass accurace and 2 key passes.

Cazorla > Mata.

Source: www.whoscored.com

posted on 30/9/12

Mata - 2 goals and 2 assists in 2 games against Arsenal

New Drogba

------------------------------

posted on 30/9/12

Key pass

posted on 30/9/12

Ha ha,

Only thing carzola showed yesterday, is that hes better than all of arsenal players, and your best buy in years

posted on 30/9/12

Thanks for making Torres look good

posted on 30/9/12

Has Kathorla left Mikel's back pocket yet though?

posted on 30/9/12

What about this

Mata, goal and assist
Carzola 4key passes

posted on 30/9/12

Mata=3points

posted on 30/9/12

Any more stats, stato

posted on 30/9/12

Cazorla is not world class

posted on 30/9/12

Yeah to be honest Mata got you the three points and that's all that matters.

But wumming aside, I think Cazorla is a lot better overall than Mata.

By the way Mikel impressed me a lot yesterday defensively.

posted on 30/9/12

That's because Mikel didn't defend for two,

posted on 30/9/12

But wumming aside, I think Cazorla is a lot better overall than Mata.
-----------------------
And this is where the disagreement comes

posted on 30/9/12

If Cazorla was so good why did Mata boss the midfield?

posted on 30/9/12

Stats win games

posted on 30/9/12

Mata

Far, far, far better than Cazorla, the most overrated player in history.

comment by Bov (U6696)

posted on 30/9/12

Mata or Carzola, Carzola or Mata? its a tough choice. Both play in midfield and of course have their medals from Spains summer success so.......oh wait thats right Carzola wasnt in the Spanish squad.Could it be that Del Bosque also agrees that Mata is better . I think so

posted on 30/9/12

at all the people thinking Carzola is better then Mata.

Mata > Carzola
Silva > Carzola
Kagawa > Carzola

posted on 30/9/12

Bovril, fyg Cazorla missed out on the World Cup because he'd spent most of that season out due to surgery on a herniated disc. When fit he's been a regular in Del Bosque's call-ups and was a member of both Euro-winning squads.

Page 2 of 4

Sign in if you want to comment