Sparticus explain yourself
Sparticus, Iwas says you grassed him up because of all the times he made you look an idiot.
How do you respond?
Do you have my block splitter or maybe you know someone who does?
I can't imagine he'd have been banned for one comment, Rameses.
Was there an on-going argument..? I'd imagine Admins are all over any form of racism at the moment, what with it being fashionable and all, but both of these guys are humorous contributors to DCFC 606 and often poke fun at subject matter that might not be considered PC, or at least don't appear offended too easily by it.
The "Reinstate Iwas Campaign" starts here!
Admin1: would you care to explain yourself?!!
I recall there was one comment from Iwas (which I didn't see, btw) which Spart had pulled, information he volunteered readily when iwas subsequently posted about it.
Did things escalate from there, or has he been banned for an accumulation of things since? He certainly wasn't banned immediately when they pulled the comment so i can only imagine something else has kicked off
Iwas says he owned Sparticus on here a few times and that Spart was looking for an opportunity to get even.
Iwas made some disparaging comments about the travelling community and Spart was in.
I have this from the horses mouth as Iwas is my brother.
I am eager to hear what Sparticus has to say.
I would say the language used was rather fruity but it was Sparticus who complained twice.
I posted a whole article on here about travellers when they pitched up on the Wyvern estate, and I wasn't subtle.. i didn't get banned, although the article WAS pulled.
There must be more to it. One transgression doesn't get you banned.
Iwas used a racist comment to describe a group of people. Then instead of backing off when he was reported he made even more inflammatory comments.
It was just after we had beaten the dogs and they were putting on lots of whinging messages. We had the high moral ground but Iwas was about to lose that position with making racist comments which are incidentally mentioned in the house rules. Had he just backed for the first incident he would still be posting. As it was he sought to make the situation worse. Don't blame me for Iwas being banned as it would have happened anyway once the dogs saw his post. At least this way it did not distract from our forcing the dogs to eat humble pie.
I make no apology for what I did, Iwas was the instrument of his own banning.
Iwas, has just text me was, he used a shortened version of the word gypsy and Sparticus said it was racist and it got removed. There was a follow up where Iwas was againing disparaging toward the trtavelling community, Spart steamed in again and that's all she wrote. (for Iwas anyway)
Why would we dogs complain about Iwas.
For all his faults I doubt there would be many Reds on here wanting him banned
Free the Iwas one!
Thanks for stopping by Sparticus.
Iwas is a long time contributor on here. He was not having a go at you but you took it upon yourself to get him banned on behalf of those well adjusted, tax paying, lovable travellers.
You had your own agenda, you were loking for this opportunity and you moved.
Thanks Webbo.
A couple of your brethren may disagree but generally i think he was a welcome poster on your board.
The FA would be all over this story if they knew about it. Especially when racism is now more fashionable than Stella McCartney's winter collection.
Yeah but shopped by one of your own?
I'd love to know 666, why you think you have inside knowledge about how and why people get banned from this forum. You speak like an expert.
I do however know by speaking to the Admins, that you are one of the main complainers when it comes down to people being kicked off this forum and having their articles pulled.
You attempt to give it out 666, but when you are gotten the better of decide its best to try to ban or filter the person concerned.
You acted in exactly the same way on BBC 606 and this got my back up then and I have never let you off the hook about it. You got many Derby and Forest fans banned from on there as well.
Please respond to my accusation as we all know you read my comments because you often reply to them. If you pretend you can't see this comment we will all know that I have hit the nail right on the head.
What is this carp you are on about Rameses. Nothing to do with my own agenda. Iwas may have paranoid delusions that I reported him because of some vendetta but I have no problem with anyone on here. I have a go at 666 because he's a Tory and Sutton because he's a monarchist but apart from that my posts are all football related.
If he believes he owned anyone on here than I can only think he is also delusional about his powers of wit and rhetoric. I would have reported anyone who did the same. He should remember this is not the 1970s. We have moved on from the days of "love thy neighbour".
There are forums where racist comments are accepted but this is not one of them.
You can talk Colbi about complaining and getting articles pulled, never mind dishing crap none stop, so I doubt anyone should have to answer to the village idiot of the Derby board.
Admins
Free Iwas.
He sometimes sails close to the wind but so do many on here.
The Derby - Forest interaction is amongst the most vibrant on JA606 and it's because of poster like Iwaslevel.
He has been a contributor since the early years of 606 and should not be banned by the actions of one disgruntled poster.
I am quite sure that he will be repentant should you let him back in.
Rameses, admin might not pick it up here but E-mail direct and they will get back to ya.
Return Iwas
You should call to have him re-instated Spartacus.
I have started a thread about getting Iwas released from prison:
http://www.ja606.co.uk/articles/viewArticle/160000
I have no problem with his return; he can abuse me as much as he likes but if he makes racist comments I will report him again.
Looks like 666 has struck again and had my "Free Iwas" article pulled.
Igor,
Don't lets turn this article into a cheek you're more educated, more intelligent, better looking, higher class, generally cleverer posters will you.
Sign in if you want to comment
Iwas Banned
Page 1 of 9
6 | 7 | 8 | 9
posted on 16/10/12
Sparticus explain yourself
posted on 16/10/12
Sparticus, Iwas says you grassed him up because of all the times he made you look an idiot.
How do you respond?
Do you have my block splitter or maybe you know someone who does?
posted on 16/10/12
I can't imagine he'd have been banned for one comment, Rameses.
Was there an on-going argument..? I'd imagine Admins are all over any form of racism at the moment, what with it being fashionable and all, but both of these guys are humorous contributors to DCFC 606 and often poke fun at subject matter that might not be considered PC, or at least don't appear offended too easily by it.
The "Reinstate Iwas Campaign" starts here!
Admin1: would you care to explain yourself?!!
posted on 16/10/12
I recall there was one comment from Iwas (which I didn't see, btw) which Spart had pulled, information he volunteered readily when iwas subsequently posted about it.
Did things escalate from there, or has he been banned for an accumulation of things since? He certainly wasn't banned immediately when they pulled the comment so i can only imagine something else has kicked off
posted on 16/10/12
Iwas says he owned Sparticus on here a few times and that Spart was looking for an opportunity to get even.
Iwas made some disparaging comments about the travelling community and Spart was in.
I have this from the horses mouth as Iwas is my brother.
I am eager to hear what Sparticus has to say.
posted on 16/10/12
I would say the language used was rather fruity but it was Sparticus who complained twice.
posted on 16/10/12
I posted a whole article on here about travellers when they pitched up on the Wyvern estate, and I wasn't subtle.. i didn't get banned, although the article WAS pulled.
There must be more to it. One transgression doesn't get you banned.
posted on 16/10/12
Iwas used a racist comment to describe a group of people. Then instead of backing off when he was reported he made even more inflammatory comments.
It was just after we had beaten the dogs and they were putting on lots of whinging messages. We had the high moral ground but Iwas was about to lose that position with making racist comments which are incidentally mentioned in the house rules. Had he just backed for the first incident he would still be posting. As it was he sought to make the situation worse. Don't blame me for Iwas being banned as it would have happened anyway once the dogs saw his post. At least this way it did not distract from our forcing the dogs to eat humble pie.
I make no apology for what I did, Iwas was the instrument of his own banning.
posted on 16/10/12
Iwas, has just text me was, he used a shortened version of the word gypsy and Sparticus said it was racist and it got removed. There was a follow up where Iwas was againing disparaging toward the trtavelling community, Spart steamed in again and that's all she wrote. (for Iwas anyway)
posted on 16/10/12
Why would we dogs complain about Iwas.
For all his faults I doubt there would be many Reds on here wanting him banned
Free the Iwas one!
posted on 16/10/12
Thanks for stopping by Sparticus.
Iwas is a long time contributor on here. He was not having a go at you but you took it upon yourself to get him banned on behalf of those well adjusted, tax paying, lovable travellers.
You had your own agenda, you were loking for this opportunity and you moved.
posted on 16/10/12
Thanks Webbo.
A couple of your brethren may disagree but generally i think he was a welcome poster on your board.
posted on 16/10/12
The FA would be all over this story if they knew about it. Especially when racism is now more fashionable than Stella McCartney's winter collection.
posted on 16/10/12
Yeah but shopped by one of your own?
posted on 16/10/12
I'd love to know 666, why you think you have inside knowledge about how and why people get banned from this forum. You speak like an expert.
I do however know by speaking to the Admins, that you are one of the main complainers when it comes down to people being kicked off this forum and having their articles pulled.
You attempt to give it out 666, but when you are gotten the better of decide its best to try to ban or filter the person concerned.
You acted in exactly the same way on BBC 606 and this got my back up then and I have never let you off the hook about it. You got many Derby and Forest fans banned from on there as well.
Please respond to my accusation as we all know you read my comments because you often reply to them. If you pretend you can't see this comment we will all know that I have hit the nail right on the head.
posted on 16/10/12
What is this carp you are on about Rameses. Nothing to do with my own agenda. Iwas may have paranoid delusions that I reported him because of some vendetta but I have no problem with anyone on here. I have a go at 666 because he's a Tory and Sutton because he's a monarchist but apart from that my posts are all football related.
If he believes he owned anyone on here than I can only think he is also delusional about his powers of wit and rhetoric. I would have reported anyone who did the same. He should remember this is not the 1970s. We have moved on from the days of "love thy neighbour".
There are forums where racist comments are accepted but this is not one of them.
posted on 16/10/12
You can talk Colbi about complaining and getting articles pulled, never mind dishing crap none stop, so I doubt anyone should have to answer to the village idiot of the Derby board.
posted on 16/10/12
Admins
Free Iwas.
He sometimes sails close to the wind but so do many on here.
The Derby - Forest interaction is amongst the most vibrant on JA606 and it's because of poster like Iwaslevel.
He has been a contributor since the early years of 606 and should not be banned by the actions of one disgruntled poster.
I am quite sure that he will be repentant should you let him back in.
posted on 16/10/12
Igor,
posted on 16/10/12
Rameses, admin might not pick it up here but E-mail direct and they will get back to ya.
Return Iwas
posted on 16/10/12
You should call to have him re-instated Spartacus.
posted on 16/10/12
I have started a thread about getting Iwas released from prison:
http://www.ja606.co.uk/articles/viewArticle/160000
posted on 16/10/12
I have no problem with his return; he can abuse me as much as he likes but if he makes racist comments I will report him again.
posted on 16/10/12
Looks like 666 has struck again and had my "Free Iwas" article pulled.
posted on 16/10/12
Igor,
Don't lets turn this article into a cheek you're more educated, more intelligent, better looking, higher class, generally cleverer posters will you.
Page 1 of 9
6 | 7 | 8 | 9