The shítter they get the more intervention there is to help them. They've been handed the Liverpool and Chelsea games on a plate.
it's said to cover up the corruption. What should have been a 7 point gap over them is now 1.
as soon as Clattenburg could see we were getting the upper hand he intervened. In the 1st half he wasn't bad.
it's proven fact that when refs oversee a United defeat or make mistakes in their games they are demoted.
I'm just fed up of the blatant corruption in the PL and the media (in pockets of Man U) doing nothing to tackle it.
After Ovrebo I only watched football once for the rest of the season (us v Arsenal). Increasingly disillusioned with PL now. #Corrupt
Call me a shít fan but I've no interest in watching Wednesday, I'd much rather go out. Still deflated...
I don't think United are any better than Spurs but they've been handed games at LFC and CFC on a plate
on your turf
WOW. the past decade must of killed you
There is so much more, it's good this games given him something else to talk about though. He's always obsessed with Spurs and United
"We scored 3 times, you scored twice, two of our goals came when it was 11v11 the only controversial decision in the game was our winner, stop being so melodramatic, we won by outscoring you, on your turf"
Your two goals were cancelled out when we woke up and started controlling the game. Then whilst we were looking for the inevitable third, the ref does his party piece and hands the game to you... with a little help from a clear offside goal.
So as much as you'd like it to be a clear cut "we won because we earned it by legitimately scoring more" situation, it wasn't.
You lucked out.
No, you pressed the self-destruct button, and ultimately paid the price.
Suck those lemons!!! You lost ha ha
Your two goals were cancelled out when we woke up and started controlling the game. Then whilst we were looking for the inevitable third, the ref does his party piece and hands the game to you...
......
No, Ivanovic handed the game to us.
How does an unfair dismissal and an offside goal constitute self-destruction, pray tell?
Suck those lemons!!! You lost ha ha
This must be the class and big club mentality you go on about
"No, Ivanovic handed the game to us."
That's debatable. Even with ten we were still pressing forward and looking for the third. True we might have eventually been caught on the break, but we'll never know now.
It wasn't unfair dismissal, it's what's currently termed as " professional foul" thus giving us numerical advantage, hence, self-destruct.
You are under a misapprehension, again. I am not arguing that the Ivanovic sending off wasn't the correct decision. I am talking about the Torres one and then the subsequent offside winner.
Even with ten men I believe we could have won the game. Thanks to momentum and home advantage. But once it went to nine there was no point even trying to attack.. . it was just ridiculous.
Utd fans are hilarious. The only set of fans who would label them as the victims in all of this. And I thought Liverpool fans were bad for this...
True TCP! Just can't be bothered trying to argue anymore. The reality is the ref had a shocker for both teams but Chelsea had the ones that mattered more. But even if the 3rd goal was disallowed, united would has still scored playing 9 men for 15 minutes. In the end a game was ruined by rules and the tef who had a mare........in the end I'm just chuffed we won as its been a long time coming at the bridge
What's hilarious in all of this drama is the select Chelsea fans on this forum that are hoping their players have been racially abused just so some sort of 'justice' can be taken against Clattenberg. Pathetic.
Or hoping justice is done, in light of recent events at Chelsea. A difference.
How do you know it's true? Do you want it to be true, or just a misunderstanding?
I have not formed any opinion either way. How can I? But I find it incredible that some people are already trying to accuse Chelsea of making up the accusation out of spite, because they lost a game.
I also find it incredible that certain members of your support as almost excited that their players have allegedly been racially abused.
I would put that down to some misguided feeling of vindication over the whole Terry affair. It's not a sentiment I agree with.
Fair enough. It's a pathetic way to look at it if that's the case.
Of course, but us football fans are anything but rational sometimes.
Sign in if you want to comment
Laughing at the outrage aside...
Page 6 of 6
6
posted on 29/10/12
The shítter they get the more intervention there is to help them. They've been handed the Liverpool and Chelsea games on a plate.
it's said to cover up the corruption. What should have been a 7 point gap over them is now 1.
as soon as Clattenburg could see we were getting the upper hand he intervened. In the 1st half he wasn't bad.
it's proven fact that when refs oversee a United defeat or make mistakes in their games they are demoted.
I'm just fed up of the blatant corruption in the PL and the media (in pockets of Man U) doing nothing to tackle it.
After Ovrebo I only watched football once for the rest of the season (us v Arsenal). Increasingly disillusioned with PL now. #Corrupt
Call me a shít fan but I've no interest in watching Wednesday, I'd much rather go out. Still deflated...
I don't think United are any better than Spurs but they've been handed games at LFC and CFC on a plate
posted on 29/10/12
on your turf
WOW. the past decade must of killed you
posted on 29/10/12
There is so much more, it's good this games given him something else to talk about though. He's always obsessed with Spurs and United
posted on 29/10/12
MFAO
posted on 29/10/12
"We scored 3 times, you scored twice, two of our goals came when it was 11v11 the only controversial decision in the game was our winner, stop being so melodramatic, we won by outscoring you, on your turf"
Your two goals were cancelled out when we woke up and started controlling the game. Then whilst we were looking for the inevitable third, the ref does his party piece and hands the game to you... with a little help from a clear offside goal.
So as much as you'd like it to be a clear cut "we won because we earned it by legitimately scoring more" situation, it wasn't.
You lucked out.
posted on 29/10/12
No, you pressed the self-destruct button, and ultimately paid the price.
posted on 29/10/12
Buble is raging
posted on 29/10/12
Suck those lemons!!! You lost ha ha
posted on 29/10/12
Your two goals were cancelled out when we woke up and started controlling the game. Then whilst we were looking for the inevitable third, the ref does his party piece and hands the game to you...
......
No, Ivanovic handed the game to us.
posted on 29/10/12
How does an unfair dismissal and an offside goal constitute self-destruction, pray tell?
posted on 29/10/12
Suck those lemons!!! You lost ha ha
This must be the class and big club mentality you go on about
posted on 29/10/12
"No, Ivanovic handed the game to us."
That's debatable. Even with ten we were still pressing forward and looking for the third. True we might have eventually been caught on the break, but we'll never know now.
posted on 29/10/12
It wasn't unfair dismissal, it's what's currently termed as " professional foul" thus giving us numerical advantage, hence, self-destruct.
posted on 29/10/12
You are under a misapprehension, again. I am not arguing that the Ivanovic sending off wasn't the correct decision. I am talking about the Torres one and then the subsequent offside winner.
Even with ten men I believe we could have won the game. Thanks to momentum and home advantage. But once it went to nine there was no point even trying to attack.. . it was just ridiculous.
posted on 29/10/12
Utd fans are hilarious. The only set of fans who would label them as the victims in all of this. And I thought Liverpool fans were bad for this...
posted on 29/10/12
True TCP! Just can't be bothered trying to argue anymore. The reality is the ref had a shocker for both teams but Chelsea had the ones that mattered more. But even if the 3rd goal was disallowed, united would has still scored playing 9 men for 15 minutes. In the end a game was ruined by rules and the tef who had a mare........in the end I'm just chuffed we won as its been a long time coming at the bridge
posted on 29/10/12
What's hilarious in all of this drama is the select Chelsea fans on this forum that are hoping their players have been racially abused just so some sort of 'justice' can be taken against Clattenberg. Pathetic.
posted on 29/10/12
Or hoping justice is done, in light of recent events at Chelsea. A difference.
posted on 29/10/12
How do you know it's true? Do you want it to be true, or just a misunderstanding?
posted on 29/10/12
I have not formed any opinion either way. How can I? But I find it incredible that some people are already trying to accuse Chelsea of making up the accusation out of spite, because they lost a game.
posted on 29/10/12
I also find it incredible that certain members of your support as almost excited that their players have allegedly been racially abused.
posted on 29/10/12
I would put that down to some misguided feeling of vindication over the whole Terry affair. It's not a sentiment I agree with.
posted on 29/10/12
Fair enough. It's a pathetic way to look at it if that's the case.
posted on 29/10/12
Of course, but us football fans are anything but rational sometimes.
Page 6 of 6
6