I wondered hiw long it would take fir the dreaded R word to appear...
You gotta love the irony? England need to win this current game to save the series. And heres me thinking India may lose today..
You gotta love the irony? England need to win this current game to save the series. And heres me thinking India may lose today..
----------------------------------
Exactly, they need to win today to save the series.
I don't take irony by surprise nowdays as far as the indian test team is concerned. I would love to call it an adaptation period.
English team need to act soon or hand over the series tomorrow.
the Indian test team have been at the top of rankings for what a year and half ,two maybe? and suddenly there the greatest in history.. Dont get to carried away for the reasons most of India's players are ancient and from the looks of it not many to take their place..
the Indian test team have been at the top of rankings for what a year and half ,two maybe? and suddenly there the greatest in history.. Dont get to carried away for the reasons most of India's players are ancient and from the looks of it not many to take their place..
-------------
If we would have been playing S.A. or AUS or Sri lanka then would have been a different case, I don't consider ENG as a top balanced side even in their home game, its very mutch like their football team with burden of higher expectations.
As far as IND is concerned it has a lot more players than needed to replace them, I am afraid talented players like yuvraj singh and rohit sharma do not gets burnt out of their chance inspite of prooving their worthyness.
Vampire_7
Have you been watching the same game as us?
England having a more unbalanced than Aus and Sri Lanka? You obviously know nothing about cricket what so ever and you should just leave, England probably have the most balanced attack right now, irrispective of the current series and even the current game, England have a more balanced attack than India, India are yet to take 10 wickets, and England have scored 450, yes India's batting is arguably the best in the world ATM but, England have arugably the best bowling attack in the world.
I think the only way to describe the OP is optimistic bordering on delusional.
themajiknumba
I think thats putting it lightly
lazyplayer-187
very well said, I apologise that i was a bit harsh on claiming ENG as not of a more balanced side. Well if you look at the history you will see india has faced far more better bowling attack than what the current english team posses. Let me remind you the batting team is more or less the same.
As far as bowling is concerned, i doubt it may not be as good as yours but enough to pack this series.
And i am not getting over confident, this is because i had been watching the same team for more than decade.
Page 1 of 1
First
Previous
1
Next
Latest
Sign in if you want to comment
my views
Page 1 of 1
posted on 25/7/11
save the series.. ok
posted on 25/7/11
I wondered hiw long it would take fir the dreaded R word to appear...
posted on 25/7/11
You gotta love the irony? England need to win this current game to save the series. And heres me thinking India may lose today..
posted on 25/7/11
You gotta love the irony? England need to win this current game to save the series. And heres me thinking India may lose today..
----------------------------------
Exactly, they need to win today to save the series.
I don't take irony by surprise nowdays as far as the indian test team is concerned. I would love to call it an adaptation period.
English team need to act soon or hand over the series tomorrow.
posted on 25/7/11
the Indian test team have been at the top of rankings for what a year and half ,two maybe? and suddenly there the greatest in history.. Dont get to carried away for the reasons most of India's players are ancient and from the looks of it not many to take their place..
posted on 25/7/11
the Indian test team have been at the top of rankings for what a year and half ,two maybe? and suddenly there the greatest in history.. Dont get to carried away for the reasons most of India's players are ancient and from the looks of it not many to take their place..
-------------
If we would have been playing S.A. or AUS or Sri lanka then would have been a different case, I don't consider ENG as a top balanced side even in their home game, its very mutch like their football team with burden of higher expectations.
As far as IND is concerned it has a lot more players than needed to replace them, I am afraid talented players like yuvraj singh and rohit sharma do not gets burnt out of their chance inspite of prooving their worthyness.
posted on 25/7/11
Vampire_7
Have you been watching the same game as us?
England having a more unbalanced than Aus and Sri Lanka? You obviously know nothing about cricket what so ever and you should just leave, England probably have the most balanced attack right now, irrispective of the current series and even the current game, England have a more balanced attack than India, India are yet to take 10 wickets, and England have scored 450, yes India's batting is arguably the best in the world ATM but, England have arugably the best bowling attack in the world.
posted on 25/7/11
I think the only way to describe the OP is optimistic bordering on delusional.
posted on 25/7/11
themajiknumba
I think thats putting it lightly
posted on 26/7/11
lazyplayer-187
very well said, I apologise that i was a bit harsh on claiming ENG as not of a more balanced side. Well if you look at the history you will see india has faced far more better bowling attack than what the current english team posses. Let me remind you the batting team is more or less the same.
As far as bowling is concerned, i doubt it may not be as good as yours but enough to pack this series.
And i am not getting over confident, this is because i had been watching the same team for more than decade.
Page 1 of 1