...would you watch or listen to coverage of the women's Open?
----------------------------------------
No. Or womens football, tennis or anything else you care to mention. Some would call me a sexist but i'm not. It's just................hmmmmmm........ why would i want to watch some sportswomen when i know that THAT particular sport can be played better.................by men? Men are physically faster than women, stronger than women so why would i want to watch women play a 'game' as opposed to men? Even my wife agrees!!!!
I have it on very good authority that they display excellent prowess at Snakes and Ladders,Pick a Stick and Table Rugby; so there.........
Its funny really they want to be treated the same but when it comes to goal celebrations they never put their head in the shirt and run round,they never rip the shirt off and throw it in the crowd AND they NEVER swap shirts at the end of games!
So for that reason "Im oot" (In a Duncan Dragon voice)
Come on wake up everyone, time to start chatting, arguing and generally having a debate.
Waky waky ! !
WAKY WAKY.Is that someplace in Australia?
comment by Ramsey (U5023)
posted 2 hours, 9 minutes ago
i pay 10quid a month on my phone. pay as you go. live with dad so he pays internet etc. all i pay for is clothes, alcohol, going out.
People don't do plain speaking any more and I have such a hard time reading between the lines.
Charles Bohris Ferster (1 November 1922 – 3 February 1981) was an American behavioral psychologist. A pioneer of applied behavior analysis, he developed errorless learning and was a colleague of B.F. Skinner's at Harvard University, co-authoring the book Schedules of Reinforcement (1957).
A proposal for a minimum wage of £15 an hour simply shows how financially illiterate people in Labour are. That would be £600 a week, that is more than £30,000 a year. Minimum wage! Office cleaners, shelf-stackers, people with no or few qualifications worth anything much, on £30k a year! Most businesses could never afford anything like this. Then wages up the scale would also need to be increased. Then "benefits" would need to be increased, to be "fair". Complete rubbish!
Page 1 of 1
First
Previous
1
Next
Latest
Sign in if you want to comment
Does anybody really care?
Page 1 of 1
posted on 28/7/11
...would you watch or listen to coverage of the women's Open?
----------------------------------------
No. Or womens football, tennis or anything else you care to mention. Some would call me a sexist but i'm not. It's just................hmmmmmm........ why would i want to watch some sportswomen when i know that THAT particular sport can be played better.................by men? Men are physically faster than women, stronger than women so why would i want to watch women play a 'game' as opposed to men? Even my wife agrees!!!!
posted on 31/7/11
I have it on very good authority that they display excellent prowess at Snakes and Ladders,Pick a Stick and Table Rugby; so there.........
posted on 3/8/11
Its funny really they want to be treated the same but when it comes to goal celebrations they never put their head in the shirt and run round,they never rip the shirt off and throw it in the crowd AND they NEVER swap shirts at the end of games!
So for that reason "Im oot" (In a Duncan Dragon voice)
posted on 13/5/12
Come on wake up everyone, time to start chatting, arguing and generally having a debate.
Waky waky ! !
posted on 14/5/12
WAKY WAKY.Is that someplace in Australia?
posted on 19/6/13
comment by Ramsey (U5023)
posted 2 hours, 9 minutes ago
i pay 10quid a month on my phone. pay as you go. live with dad so he pays internet etc. all i pay for is clothes, alcohol, going out.
posted on 19/6/13
wogga wogga Silky blue
posted on 19/6/13
People don't do plain speaking any more and I have such a hard time reading between the lines.
posted on 22/1/21
Charles Bohris Ferster (1 November 1922 – 3 February 1981) was an American behavioral psychologist. A pioneer of applied behavior analysis, he developed errorless learning and was a colleague of B.F. Skinner's at Harvard University, co-authoring the book Schedules of Reinforcement (1957).
posted on 29/9/21
A proposal for a minimum wage of £15 an hour simply shows how financially illiterate people in Labour are. That would be £600 a week, that is more than £30,000 a year. Minimum wage! Office cleaners, shelf-stackers, people with no or few qualifications worth anything much, on £30k a year! Most businesses could never afford anything like this. Then wages up the scale would also need to be increased. Then "benefits" would need to be increased, to be "fair". Complete rubbish!
Page 1 of 1