I'm sorry I don't mention anything about Hazard not making contract. I just don't think there is any intention in hurting the ball boy.
Whether Hazard makes contact is up for debate
comment by Pride of the North (U6803)
posted 54 minutes ago
should be out for the season
===================
For kicking a ball?.............Your dad was a strict man!
I just don't think there is any intention in hurting the ball boy.
......................
So, if someone kneed you in the bollox, and said, sorry, I did not intend to do that, you would be quite OK with it then?
comment by Chaz (Slayer of the over sensitive) (U15980)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Pride of the North (U6803)
posted 54 minutes ago
should be out for the season
===================
For kicking a ball?.............
..............
Chaz,
Are you a former Liverpool fan who jumped ship once Chelsea started winning things?
You certainly sound like one. He kicked the ball boy, not the ball.
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 34 minutes ago
Hazard didn't kick the ball boy, he kick his chubby fat prat belly
..................
Do you have an English version of this? I don't speak idiot.
====================
Yet you type like one so well.
Vidicschin
when you bump into somebody into the street, most of the time both people say sorry. Likewise if my balls made contact with somebody's knee, I would say sorry for my balls getting their knees way
Your example again doesn't really imply with the Hazard case. It can be related though to Eric's assault. Hazard tries to get the ball, he makes minimal contact.
I can't believe people STILL think that he kicked the ballboy!
Also the ball boy holds his left hand side. IF Hazard were to make any contact, he surely would have kicked the right hand side?
Chaz,
Are you a former Liverpool fan who jumped ship once Chelsea started winning things?
You certainly sound like one. He kicked the ball boy, not the ball.
=================
Feck off he kicked the ball" man" There may have been some contact with the shin, but he toe poked the ball.
Your example again doesn't really imply with the Hazard case.
...............
It does, you just don't want it to. I understand, you are blindly devoted to your player, I do get that.
Haha what farking gooba is comparing hazard gate to the cantona kung fu kick
That is amazing.
Also the ball boy holds his left hand side. IF Hazard were to make any contact, he surely would have kicked the right hand side?
..................
The boy was laying face down, not on his back.
comment by Toby lerone (U12295)
posted 17 seconds ago
Haha what farking gooba is comparing hazard gate to the cantona kung fu kick
.............
No one is, what tool thinks they are?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2267629/Eden-Hazard-ball-boy-row-new-footage-supports-Belgian-claim-kicked-ball.html
=================
So he kicked him?
What do the society of black lawyers have to say about this? have they recommended 50% of ball boys are ethnic?
I'm not really blindly devoted to Hazard. Though like most people, I believe a 3 math ban is sufficient. Most people actually agree. The irony is that its you who are blindly devoted to Cantona, by comparing his assault, to a fairly innocent incident involving Hazard trying to retrieve a ball
*************************************
I can't believe people STILL think that he kicked the ballboy!
**********************************
Ronny,
I don't think that he actually kicked the ballboy either. However, I think that the FA is sending a MESSAGE to prevent this player conduct from happening again. Next time perhaps a misbehaving ballboy might get kicked and injured. Then the legal system would get involved at the cost of millions!
I would like to see this ballboy permanently suspended and his club fined. Perhaps that would also be a deterrent in the future?
Also a similar incident occurred in a Swindon-Oxford, the player received a yellow card, and no punishment by the FA despite complaints by Oxford and their fans
The irony is that its you who are blindly devoted to Cantona, by comparing his assault, to a fairly innocent incident involving Hazard trying to retrieve a ball
.................
What utter bollox
No apology necessary Vidicschin
What a strange little individual.
Do you wet the bed?
________________________________________
Yea have u ever eaten pusssy?
comment by Chaz (Slayer of the over sensitive) (U15980)
posted 2 minutes ago
No apology necessary Vidicschin
..............
Apology for what.
I take it you didn't look a the clip I posted then?
Right , heading for home.
comment by Chaz (Slayer of the over sensitive) (U15980)
posted 1 minute ago
I take it you didn't look a the clip I posted then?
..............
Seen it before. Not very conclusive is it. Looks a bit doctored as well.
Pretty standard for the Daily Mail.
Sign in if you want to comment
Hazard's ban will not increase
Page 2 of 4
posted on 31/1/13
I'm sorry I don't mention anything about Hazard not making contract. I just don't think there is any intention in hurting the ball boy.
Whether Hazard makes contact is up for debate
posted on 31/1/13
comment by Pride of the North (U6803)
posted 54 minutes ago
should be out for the season
===================
For kicking a ball?.............Your dad was a strict man!
posted on 31/1/13
I just don't think there is any intention in hurting the ball boy.
......................
So, if someone kneed you in the bollox, and said, sorry, I did not intend to do that, you would be quite OK with it then?
posted on 31/1/13
comment by Chaz (Slayer of the over sensitive) (U15980)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Pride of the North (U6803)
posted 54 minutes ago
should be out for the season
===================
For kicking a ball?.............
..............
Chaz,
Are you a former Liverpool fan who jumped ship once Chelsea started winning things?
You certainly sound like one. He kicked the ball boy, not the ball.
posted on 31/1/13
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 34 minutes ago
Hazard didn't kick the ball boy, he kick his chubby fat prat belly
..................
Do you have an English version of this? I don't speak idiot.
====================
Yet you type like one so well.
posted on 31/1/13
Vidicschin
when you bump into somebody into the street, most of the time both people say sorry. Likewise if my balls made contact with somebody's knee, I would say sorry for my balls getting their knees way
Your example again doesn't really imply with the Hazard case. It can be related though to Eric's assault. Hazard tries to get the ball, he makes minimal contact.
posted on 31/1/13
I can't believe people STILL think that he kicked the ballboy!
posted on 31/1/13
Also the ball boy holds his left hand side. IF Hazard were to make any contact, he surely would have kicked the right hand side?
posted on 31/1/13
Chaz,
Are you a former Liverpool fan who jumped ship once Chelsea started winning things?
You certainly sound like one. He kicked the ball boy, not the ball.
=================
Feck off he kicked the ball" man" There may have been some contact with the shin, but he toe poked the ball.
posted on 31/1/13
Your example again doesn't really imply with the Hazard case.
...............
It does, you just don't want it to. I understand, you are blindly devoted to your player, I do get that.
posted on 31/1/13
Haha what farking gooba is comparing hazard gate to the cantona kung fu kick
That is amazing.
posted on 31/1/13
Also the ball boy holds his left hand side. IF Hazard were to make any contact, he surely would have kicked the right hand side?
..................
The boy was laying face down, not on his back.
posted on 31/1/13
comment by Toby lerone (U12295)
posted 17 seconds ago
Haha what farking gooba is comparing hazard gate to the cantona kung fu kick
.............
No one is, what tool thinks they are?
posted on 31/1/13
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2267629/Eden-Hazard-ball-boy-row-new-footage-supports-Belgian-claim-kicked-ball.html
=================
So he kicked him?
posted on 31/1/13
What do the society of black lawyers have to say about this? have they recommended 50% of ball boys are ethnic?
posted on 31/1/13
I'm not really blindly devoted to Hazard. Though like most people, I believe a 3 math ban is sufficient. Most people actually agree. The irony is that its you who are blindly devoted to Cantona, by comparing his assault, to a fairly innocent incident involving Hazard trying to retrieve a ball
posted on 31/1/13
*************************************
I can't believe people STILL think that he kicked the ballboy!
**********************************
Ronny,
I don't think that he actually kicked the ballboy either. However, I think that the FA is sending a MESSAGE to prevent this player conduct from happening again. Next time perhaps a misbehaving ballboy might get kicked and injured. Then the legal system would get involved at the cost of millions!
I would like to see this ballboy permanently suspended and his club fined. Perhaps that would also be a deterrent in the future?
posted on 31/1/13
Also a similar incident occurred in a Swindon-Oxford, the player received a yellow card, and no punishment by the FA despite complaints by Oxford and their fans
posted on 31/1/13
The irony is that its you who are blindly devoted to Cantona, by comparing his assault, to a fairly innocent incident involving Hazard trying to retrieve a ball
.................
What utter bollox
posted on 31/1/13
No apology necessary Vidicschin
posted on 31/1/13
What a strange little individual.
Do you wet the bed?
________________________________________
Yea have u ever eaten pusssy?
posted on 31/1/13
comment by Chaz (Slayer of the over sensitive) (U15980)
posted 2 minutes ago
No apology necessary Vidicschin
..............
Apology for what.
posted on 31/1/13
I take it you didn't look a the clip I posted then?
posted on 31/1/13
Right , heading for home.
posted on 31/1/13
comment by Chaz (Slayer of the over sensitive) (U15980)
posted 1 minute ago
I take it you didn't look a the clip I posted then?
..............
Seen it before. Not very conclusive is it. Looks a bit doctored as well.
Pretty standard for the Daily Mail.
Page 2 of 4