https://www.cbssports.com/soccer/news/arsenal-aim-for-left-wing-transfer-is-real-madrids-rodrygo-the-best-fit-to-upgrade-gabriele-martinelli/

According to CBS Sports sources, Al-Nassr have held internal discussions over the forward but the Saudi Arabian club have not put together a proposal for Arsenal's consideration and are not currently preparing a bid.

Yamal was trusted with the first team at 15. Dowman can follow that path too. Nwaneri is a year more experienced.

Yamal will be a broken man in a couple of years for sure. Barca do that to all their youngsters these days, desperate for another Messi.

comment by 50 No longer trusting the process (U1147)
posted 20 seconds ago
Yamal was trusted with the first team at 15. Dowman can follow that path too. Nwaneri is a year more experienced.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Keep in mind, Liga is less intense and players don't tend to try to break legs for media adulation.

plus playing for Barca means its illegal for the other team to tackle you.

comment by Jenius99 (U4918)
posted 26 minutes ago
https://www.cbssports.com/soccer/news/arsenal-aim-for-left-wing-transfer-is-real-madrids-rodrygo-the-best-fit-to-upgrade-gabriele-martinelli/

According to CBS Sports sources, Al-Nassr have held internal discussions over the forward but the Saudi Arabian club have not put together a proposal for Arsenal's consideration and are not currently preparing a bid.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You're a bit all over the place here. Random rumours about clubs having an interest in Martinelli is not what is under dispute, but the specific bid from Al Nassr that you're referenced in which you're questioning why Arsenal aren't taking the money. My point was always that if such a bid had ever truly come in, Martinelli would have been sold in seconds. There's no evidence of some kind of sentimentality in keeping Martinelli. He's definitely a player we'd let go if a solid bid came in.

comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 46 minutes ago
12 weeks maximum
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fear of an ACL injury.

Arsenal are initially expected to look at loans and bargains to cover Havertz injury if they receive bad news on his injury.

(
@Matt_Law_DT
)

comment by Sheriff John Brown - Arteta IN!!! (U7482)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Jenius99 (U4918)
posted 26 minutes ago
https://www.cbssports.com/soccer/news/arsenal-aim-for-left-wing-transfer-is-real-madrids-rodrygo-the-best-fit-to-upgrade-gabriele-martinelli/

According to CBS Sports sources, Al-Nassr have held internal discussions over the forward but the Saudi Arabian club have not put together a proposal for Arsenal's consideration and are not currently preparing a bid.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You're a bit all over the place here. Random rumours about clubs having an interest in Martinelli is not what is under dispute, but the specific bid from Al Nassr that you're referenced in which you're questioning why Arsenal aren't taking the money. My point was always that if such a bid had ever truly come in, Martinelli would have been sold in seconds. There's no evidence of some kind of sentimentality in keeping Martinelli. He's definitely a player we'd let go if a solid bid came in.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thats not how it works.

Clubs in Saudi League have to request financing for a proposed move. So Al-Nassr requested an amount that they were able to spend on a wide player. They had a shortlist that includes the likes of Diaz and Martinelli. As I mentioned Athletic and others btw (pointed out above) took this to mean that they have offered a deal. However that requires Arsenal to give them encouragement that Martinelli is available for transfer. Thats when the talks begin for Al-Nassr to then officially bid. Arsenal said that Martinelli is not for sale. As CBS and others have pointed out so the story died at that point.

Arsenal have to make Martinelli available for transfer before teams can approach with a fee that they believe he is worth. Arsenal have never done that!

comment by Jenius99 (U4918)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Sheriff John Brown - Arteta IN!!! (U7482)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Jenius99 (U4918)
posted 26 minutes ago
https://www.cbssports.com/soccer/news/arsenal-aim-for-left-wing-transfer-is-real-madrids-rodrygo-the-best-fit-to-upgrade-gabriele-martinelli/

According to CBS Sports sources, Al-Nassr have held internal discussions over the forward but the Saudi Arabian club have not put together a proposal for Arsenal's consideration and are not currently preparing a bid.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You're a bit all over the place here. Random rumours about clubs having an interest in Martinelli is not what is under dispute, but the specific bid from Al Nassr that you're referenced in which you're questioning why Arsenal aren't taking the money. My point was always that if such a bid had ever truly come in, Martinelli would have been sold in seconds. There's no evidence of some kind of sentimentality in keeping Martinelli. He's definitely a player we'd let go if a solid bid came in.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thats not how it works.

Clubs in Saudi League have to request financing for a proposed move. So Al-Nassr requested an amount that they were able to spend on a wide player. They had a shortlist that includes the likes of Diaz and Martinelli. As I mentioned Athletic and others btw (pointed out above) took this to mean that they have offered a deal. However that requires Arsenal to give them encouragement that Martinelli is available for transfer. Thats when the talks begin for Al-Nassr to then officially bid. Arsenal said that Martinelli is not for sale. As CBS and others have pointed out so the story died at that point.

Arsenal have to make Martinelli available for transfer before teams can approach with a fee that they believe he is worth. Arsenal have never done that!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lol

comment by Gunnerthru (U6675)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 46 minutes ago
12 weeks maximum
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fear of an ACL injury.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your man Yankee Gunner saying 12 weeks

comment by Castor Troy (U8700)
posted 49 seconds ago
comment by Jenius99 (U4918)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Sheriff John Brown - Arteta IN!!! (U7482)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Jenius99 (U4918)
posted 26 minutes ago
https://www.cbssports.com/soccer/news/arsenal-aim-for-left-wing-transfer-is-real-madrids-rodrygo-the-best-fit-to-upgrade-gabriele-martinelli/

According to CBS Sports sources, Al-Nassr have held internal discussions over the forward but the Saudi Arabian club have not put together a proposal for Arsenal's consideration and are not currently preparing a bid.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You're a bit all over the place here. Random rumours about clubs having an interest in Martinelli is not what is under dispute, but the specific bid from Al Nassr that you're referenced in which you're questioning why Arsenal aren't taking the money. My point was always that if such a bid had ever truly come in, Martinelli would have been sold in seconds. There's no evidence of some kind of sentimentality in keeping Martinelli. He's definitely a player we'd let go if a solid bid came in.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thats not how it works.

Clubs in Saudi League have to request financing for a proposed move. So Al-Nassr requested an amount that they were able to spend on a wide player. They had a shortlist that includes the likes of Diaz and Martinelli. As I mentioned Athletic and others btw (pointed out above) took this to mean that they have offered a deal. However that requires Arsenal to give them encouragement that Martinelli is available for transfer. Thats when the talks begin for Al-Nassr to then officially bid. Arsenal said that Martinelli is not for sale. As CBS and others have pointed out so the story died at that point.

Arsenal have to make Martinelli available for transfer before teams can approach with a fee that they believe he is worth. Arsenal have never done that!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Lol
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Castor m8 you are clueless.

comment by Gunnerthru (U6675)
posted 8 minutes ago
Arsenal are initially expected to look at loans and bargains to cover Havertz injury if they receive bad news on his injury.

(
@Matt_Law_DT
)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dani Ceballos

Isak on loan with option of a £120m next season?

comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by Gunnerthru (U6675)
posted 8 minutes ago
Arsenal are initially expected to look at loans and bargains to cover Havertz injury if they receive bad news on his injury.

(
@Matt_Law_DT
)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dani Ceballos
----------------------------------------------------------------------
YES!!!!!

comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by Gunnerthru (U6675)
posted 4 minutes ago
comment by CrouchEndGooner (U13531)
posted 46 minutes ago
12 weeks maximum
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fear of an ACL injury.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Your man Yankee Gunner saying 12 weeks
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yankee Gunner who?

Rahim Sterling is the answer

comment by Jenius99 (U4918)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Sheriff John Brown - Arteta IN!!! (U7482)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Jenius99 (U4918)
posted 26 minutes ago
https://www.cbssports.com/soccer/news/arsenal-aim-for-left-wing-transfer-is-real-madrids-rodrygo-the-best-fit-to-upgrade-gabriele-martinelli/

According to CBS Sports sources, Al-Nassr have held internal discussions over the forward but the Saudi Arabian club have not put together a proposal for Arsenal's consideration and are not currently preparing a bid.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You're a bit all over the place here. Random rumours about clubs having an interest in Martinelli is not what is under dispute, but the specific bid from Al Nassr that you're referenced in which you're questioning why Arsenal aren't taking the money. My point was always that if such a bid had ever truly come in, Martinelli would have been sold in seconds. There's no evidence of some kind of sentimentality in keeping Martinelli. He's definitely a player we'd let go if a solid bid came in.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thats not how it works.

Clubs in Saudi League have to request financing for a proposed move. So Al-Nassr requested an amount that they were able to spend on a wide player. They had a shortlist that includes the likes of Diaz and Martinelli. As I mentioned Athletic and others btw (pointed out above) took this to mean that they have offered a deal. However that requires Arsenal to give them encouragement that Martinelli is available for transfer. Thats when the talks begin for Al-Nassr to then officially bid. Arsenal said that Martinelli is not for sale. As CBS and others have pointed out so the story died at that point.

Arsenal have to make Martinelli available for transfer before teams can approach with a fee that they believe he is worth. Arsenal have never done that!
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Lol.....all this ridiculous back-and-forth just to avoid admitting your initial claim was unfounded BS. Your first post that I responded to, you claimed "Frankly, we need to move on from Martinelli now while he is worth something. Al-Nassr offered €85m".

There is no evidence anyone has offered us anything. It's completely unfounded, unsubstantiated BS. Just admit that and move on. All the "Athletic deleted it", "Al Nassr have to request funds.....blah...blah...blah" is yet more BS to cover the initial BS. There is no evidence "Al-Nassr offered €85m" that we should accept. Simples.

comment by Jenius99 (U4918)
posted 1 minute ago
Isak on loan with option of a £120m next season?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
that would be hilarious if Newcaslte did that, I think at this rate they would prefer to loan to us than to sell to Liverpool

Dazza Ings is a free agent

comment by Sheriff John Brown - Arteta IN!!! (U7482)
posted 13 seconds ago
comment by Jenius99 (U4918)
posted 5 minutes ago
comment by Sheriff John Brown - Arteta IN!!! (U7482)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by Jenius99 (U4918)
posted 26 minutes ago
https://www.cbssports.com/soccer/news/arsenal-aim-for-left-wing-transfer-is-real-madrids-rodrygo-the-best-fit-to-upgrade-gabriele-martinelli/

According to CBS Sports sources, Al-Nassr have held internal discussions over the forward but the Saudi Arabian club have not put together a proposal for Arsenal's consideration and are not currently preparing a bid.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You're a bit all over the place here. Random rumours about clubs having an interest in Martinelli is not what is under dispute, but the specific bid from Al Nassr that you're referenced in which you're questioning why Arsenal aren't taking the money. My point was always that if such a bid had ever truly come in, Martinelli would have been sold in seconds. There's no evidence of some kind of sentimentality in keeping Martinelli. He's definitely a player we'd let go if a solid bid came in.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thats not how it works.

Clubs in Saudi League have to request financing for a proposed move. So Al-Nassr requested an amount that they were able to spend on a wide player. They had a shortlist that includes the likes of Diaz and Martinelli. As I mentioned Athletic and others btw (pointed out above) took this to mean that they have offered a deal. However that requires Arsenal to give them encouragement that Martinelli is available for transfer. Thats when the talks begin for Al-Nassr to then officially bid. Arsenal said that Martinelli is not for sale. As CBS and others have pointed out so the story died at that point.

Arsenal have to make Martinelli available for transfer before teams can approach with a fee that they believe he is worth. Arsenal have never done that!
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Lol.....all this ridiculous back-and-forth just to avoid admitting your initial claim was unfounded BS. Your first post that I responded to, you claimed "Frankly, we need to move on from Martinelli now while he is worth something. Al-Nassr offered €85m".

There is no evidence anyone has offered us anything. It's completely unfounded, unsubstantiated BS. Just admit that and move on. All the "Athletic deleted it", "Al Nassr have to request funds.....blah...blah...blah" is yet more BS to cover the initial BS. There is no evidence "Al-Nassr offered €85m" that we should accept. Simples.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
So you want to ignore fecking 10 links I posted is up to you.

You are the one who can't admit you had no clue about who Arsenal are linked with because you are Spurs fan.

comment by Peebs (U3245)
posted less than a minute ago
Dazza Ings is a free agent
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jamie Vardy is the answer

Neymar on loan

comment by D'Jeezus Mackaroni (U1137)
posted less than a minute ago
Neymar on loan
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tiny tears in his last game ffs. Knew he'd be yer man

I thought we were naming the worst case scenarios... Vardy, Ings, Neymar