or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 3777 comments are related to an article called:

Rio Ferdinand

Page 110 of 152

comment by Elvis (U7425)

posted on 10/6/13

Raj

Can you please copy and paste where TOOR admitted to it? So far you are just coming across a bit crazy.

posted on 11/6/13

posted on 11/6/13

So Raj didn't drop the bombshell we were all expecting? Why am I not surprised?

comment by Raj (U17528)

posted on 11/6/13

oh dear. its all too subtle for the gang.

if you look carefully you will see that theresonlyonereds said he knows what page the comment is on.

now come on gang. what do you think that means?

yep. that he searched the thread and realised his mistake.

so heres where we are.

theresonlyonereds thought he could deflect the lie by claiming to have made me trawl through the thread.

unfortunately for him he already admitted that hes done that and he doesn't realise that I already know roughly where in the thread it is.

so the game continues. I pull the strings and you guys react. and at the end of it all, theresonlyonereds will still be owned. love it!

comment by Raj (U17528)

posted on 11/6/13

by the way, love the fact that kneerash is still seething that it took me less than 2 minutes to prove him to be an obsessed hypocrite.

how many weeks has it been?

brilliant.

posted on 11/6/13

It's been months raj and you proved nothing it's all down on this thread to see, you went out of your way to google my username and the posted a comment where I praised united and said that Liverpool fans were going overboard after we won 1-4 in ot.

You tried to prove a point and it completely backfired on you and you've spent much more time and effort on this thread trying to say I'm angry and obsessed when you were the one who actually bothered to go google my username.

You then criticize TOOR for spending his time going back over this thread and you call me a hypocrite!

I've also caught you out lying several times over on this thread and you've commented on this thread way more times then I have and you call me obsessed.

You're bi-polar or something lad.

comment by Raj (U17528)

posted on 11/6/13

wow look at kneerash go.

he is seeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeething!

you were proved to talk about united regularly. It look me less than 2 minutes and since then you have been in tears.

lying on this thread?

nah. so far the only proven liar is theresonlyonereds.

calm down kneerash because your anger is coming through loud and clear at the moment.

posted on 11/6/13

Lol raj your the one frantically replying to my posts saying I'm wound up and angry etc that seems to me to be the act if an angry man.

Like I said you've spent far more time and energy on this thread then I have, you've literally spent hours on your crusade, I pop on this thread every now and again yet I'm angry and obsessed.

I've calmly put down everything you've thrown at me on this thread and you googled my username that says it all.

posted on 11/6/13

Raj

"nah. so far the only proven liar is theresonlyonereds."

Prove to us all TOOR is a liar. Don't rely on inference and assumption. Usually if you level an accusation on someone it's up to you to prove the accusation is valid.

If you post the comment then I'm sure myself and the others will stand corrected.

posted on 11/6/13

If you post the comment then I'm sure myself and the others will stand corrected.

----

That's a good point redmen raj if you can actually prove that I spent my time posting about united I will happily change my username to kneerash - owned by raj and leave it like that for the whole of next season.

Now to be obsessed you would have to show that I posted more about united then another rival club, mostly in a negative light and certainly more then I posted about Liverpool.

comment by Elvis (U7425)

posted on 11/6/13

Someone who has to keep going on about how angry everyone else is is probably projecting their own emotions. Ask yourself Raj; why are you so obsessed with the idea that we are angry? The truth will set you free.

posted on 11/6/13

Raj

You posted this before TOOR said he knew which comment you were on about.

"comment by Raj (U17528)
posted 5 days, 22 hours ago
all in good time theresonlyonereds.

all in good time.

why don't you have a little think about it.

oh this is enjoyable.

absolutely perfect.

the best owning of this entire thread awaits."

You, I assume, had some sort of proof when you made the above comment?

Why rely on TOOR inferring his own guilt, in his claim to know what comment you were talking about, if you've got proof?

Why not just post the proof?

posted on 11/6/13

He caint handle the proof

posted on 11/6/13

The proof is out there

posted on 11/6/13

4 proofs & a piano (that band of the Jonathan Ross show a few years ago).

comment by Raj (U17528)

posted on 11/6/13

difference is kneerash you're still still crying about something that happened months ago.

that's why im winning and you're not.

comment by Raj (U17528)

posted on 11/6/13

i know the proof exists red man. no hurry as far as i am concerned.

theresonlyonereds knows its there.

why hasn't he mentioned it again?

comment by Raj (U17528)

posted on 11/6/13

statman who is going on about it?

not me. i call the anger when i see it. i also compliment people when they have calmed down.

red man being a great example. he went through several nappies early in the thread but hes calmed himself down recently.

kneerash hasn't.

and its very amusing.

posted on 11/6/13

Raj

Well why not just post it then?

There's no need to build suspense. Delaying just implies that you haven't got proof.

comment by Raj (U17528)

posted on 11/6/13

red man read my first post today. theresonlyonereds was hoping id have to trawl through the thread. that was going to be his comeback i reckon.

but he slipped up.

and he hasn't really commented since. im interested to know what hes got to say.

feel free to find it yourself if you're that desperate!

comment by Elvis (U7425)

posted on 11/6/13

comment by Raj (U17528)
posted 4 minutes ago
statman who is going on about it?

not me. i call the anger when i see it. i also compliment people when they have calmed down.

-------

As I said, projecting.

comment by Raj (U17528)

posted on 11/6/13

and as i said, not me.

posted on 11/6/13

Raj

But is that proof?

You posted the comment, the one above that I quoted from 5 days ago' implying you've got proof.



comment by Raj (U17528)

posted on 11/6/13

red man are you rushing your replies?

i know the proof exists. i could get it and post it whenever i want.

i am choosing not to at the moment for the reasons given.

if you are wetting your pants with excitement and cannot wait then find it yourself.

personally im in no hurry.

posted on 11/6/13

Raj

"not me. i call the anger when i see it. i also compliment people when they have calmed down."

How can you call something you can't see? Anger isn't a visible entity on a forum, and can only be interpreted through tone. You reading posts in a particular tone, then claiming that person is angry is naive. You've claimed I've been 'seething' at various points in this thread. But I know the prose my comments have been written in. I can honestly say I've not written a word in anger. I suspect you go down the 'you're seething route' for one of two reasons;

1) it's a comfort blanket that you fall back on. Perhaps a defence mechanism.

2) you're reading comments in the wrong tone, and subsequently mis-interpreting them.

Page 110 of 152

Sign in if you want to comment