the excitable cherubs are persisting.
statman seems to have got annoyed at things not even written to him. how odd.
statman i wasnty wrong. fouls and misconduct against referees are treated differently. if you had asked me whether tripping a referee would be a red card offence at the start i would have said yes.
it speaks volumes that the only red card offence for tripping is one against a ref. dont you think? all those red cards and you cant find a single one to prove your point?
interesting.
red man its not about rules.
its about how i interpret the behaviour of someone that decides to stop talking about the topic and just continue with an off topic argument.
why would someone just stop talking about the topic?
come on red man. this is about your 12th go at winning an argument, so give it some real good thought wont you.
Raj
"its about how i interpret the behaviour of someone"
And here lies the problem. Too much 'interpreting' not enough reading.
6.50am Raj, good to know your first waking thought is us. You're winning the argument, and you are most definitely not wound up .
comment by Raj (U17528)
posted 4 hours, 45 minutes ago
the excitable cherubs are persisting.
statman seems to have got annoyed at things not even written to him. how odd.
statman i wasnty wrong. fouls and misconduct against referees are treated differently. if you had asked me whether tripping a referee would be a red card offence at the start i would have said yes.
it speaks volumes that the only red card offence for tripping is one against a ref. dont you think? all those red cards and you cant find a single one to prove your point?
interesting.
--------------------------------------------
Funny that when I defended you earlier in the thread about points that were not even written to me, you didn't view it as me getting annoyed. Double standards again on your part.
You have shown your pedantic side on here, so I have followed suit. You said that a trip could never ever be classified as violent conduct. You were wrong and I have shown you that. Ashley Barnes was charged with violent conduct for tripping the referee.
Raj are you on the internet at 08:00?
Just when you thought the weirdo could not undermine himself any further..... you are a gift that keeps giving. Father Rajmas indeed.
Robbing
Oh no, Raj was on here at 6.50am.
red man you are losing it. i read the comments and noted the fact that the other person has stopped commenting on the topic. that leads to an opinion about why that might be.
why do you think it might be?
i have given my conceivable options. feel free to add some.
oh. and how do you know where I am or what I am doing at 6.50 in the morning? not all of us sit at a desk all day, leave at the same time and then go home at the same time.
another comment that shows up your inadequate life. not mine.
yes statman. thats because when you defended me you didnt start insulting the other person.
so no. not double standards. unlucky.
And no. i am not wrong. i am telling you a player will not be sent off for violent conduct for tripping off the ball. actions towards a referee are treated differently. your case does not prove me wrong in the slightest.
i think you should read back about what i actually said. educate yourself before bringing me this substandard argument.
oh. and how do you know where I am or what I am doing at 6.50 in the morning?
----------------
Perhaps by looking at your post which says it was made 12 hours and 22 minutes ago?
Raj
"oh. and how do you know where I am or what I am doing at 6.50 in the morning? not all of us sit at a desk all day, leave at the same time and then go home at the same time."
I looked on here this morning and the last comment, by you, was at 6.50am. When did I say anything about where you are?
"another comment that shows up your inadequate life. not mine."
Now now Raj. It's not my fault you woke up, rushed to your computer/lap top/phone and had to reply. There's no need to lash out. Oh and when did I say I worked in an office, kept the same hours etc?
oh. i forgot i was dealing with simpletons.
'When did I say anything about where you are'
er. here:
'good to know your first waking thought is us'
you then kindly repeated the suggested i woke up and rushed to reply.
i repeat. how do you know where i was or how long id been up even?
looks like red man and robin have got it wrong again.
oh dear oh dear!
He didnt say where you were though did he? It's pretty simple.
Raj
On the simple front I think you need to look a bit closer to home. I didn't mention where you are. I said you your first waking thought is of us. Did I speculate that you were at home, at work, or anywhere else? Nope. I will speculate now. Considering you don't post when at work, I'd imagine you were sat at home in your Fergie Jim jams, bashing away at the key board.
But your using your distracting techniques again. A standard tactic of yours.
It's not my fault you were posting on here at the crack of dawn. Something obviously irked you.
I guess we're getting it wrong like you did when you were casting aspersions based on the time of day we were posting on here?
This is just pathetic now
comment by Raj (U17528)
posted 1 hour, 32 minutes ago
yes statman. thats because when you defended me you didnt start insulting the other person.
so no. not double standards. unlucky.
And no. i am not wrong. i am telling you a player will not be sent off for violent conduct for tripping off the ball. actions towards a referee are treated differently. your case does not prove me wrong in the slightest.
i think you should read back about what i actually said. educate yourself before bringing me this substandard argument.
---------------
I know very well what you said. That a trip cannot under any circumstances be deemed a red card. You were wrong.
Raj
"another comment that shows up your inadequate life. not mine."
I'll ask again, when have I said I work in an office?
The early bird catches the Raj.
A Raj amongst the pigeons.
Name the comedy tv personality catchphrase;
"Knowing me, knowing you, a Raaaaajjjjjjj"
Bet you can't. I'll give you a clue. Raj reminds me of him.
Is this still on topic?
If it is never a red card in a million years, completely stupid from Rio and he deserved a yellow for it but as it wasn't spotted at the time and the FA don't give retrospective yellow cards you cannot expect anything to get done about it.
so red man. you said it was my first waking thought but i could have been at work.
riiiiiiight.
dear dear red man. yet another argument passes you by. you have no idea what time i get up or what my job is.
you tried mocking me and you got it badly wrong.
my comment about you working in an office was mocking your obvious daily routine. why else would you make such a prat of yourself regarding what time i wake up?
i notice you have left behind the off topic conversation we were having. you do that a lot don't you? lose an argument then try and find something else you can argue instead.
Sign in if you want to comment
Rio Ferdinand
Page 86 of 152
87 | 88 | 89 | 90 | 91
posted on 17/4/13
the excitable cherubs are persisting.
statman seems to have got annoyed at things not even written to him. how odd.
statman i wasnty wrong. fouls and misconduct against referees are treated differently. if you had asked me whether tripping a referee would be a red card offence at the start i would have said yes.
it speaks volumes that the only red card offence for tripping is one against a ref. dont you think? all those red cards and you cant find a single one to prove your point?
interesting.
posted on 17/4/13
red man its not about rules.
its about how i interpret the behaviour of someone that decides to stop talking about the topic and just continue with an off topic argument.
why would someone just stop talking about the topic?
come on red man. this is about your 12th go at winning an argument, so give it some real good thought wont you.
posted on 17/4/13
Raj
"its about how i interpret the behaviour of someone"
And here lies the problem. Too much 'interpreting' not enough reading.
6.50am Raj, good to know your first waking thought is us. You're winning the argument, and you are most definitely not wound up .
posted on 17/4/13
comment by Raj (U17528)
posted 4 hours, 45 minutes ago
the excitable cherubs are persisting.
statman seems to have got annoyed at things not even written to him. how odd.
statman i wasnty wrong. fouls and misconduct against referees are treated differently. if you had asked me whether tripping a referee would be a red card offence at the start i would have said yes.
it speaks volumes that the only red card offence for tripping is one against a ref. dont you think? all those red cards and you cant find a single one to prove your point?
interesting.
--------------------------------------------
Funny that when I defended you earlier in the thread about points that were not even written to me, you didn't view it as me getting annoyed. Double standards again on your part.
You have shown your pedantic side on here, so I have followed suit. You said that a trip could never ever be classified as violent conduct. You were wrong and I have shown you that. Ashley Barnes was charged with violent conduct for tripping the referee.
posted on 17/4/13
Raj are you on the internet at 08:00?
Just when you thought the weirdo could not undermine himself any further..... you are a gift that keeps giving. Father Rajmas indeed.
posted on 17/4/13
Robbing
Oh no, Raj was on here at 6.50am.
posted on 17/4/13
red man you are losing it. i read the comments and noted the fact that the other person has stopped commenting on the topic. that leads to an opinion about why that might be.
why do you think it might be?
i have given my conceivable options. feel free to add some.
oh. and how do you know where I am or what I am doing at 6.50 in the morning? not all of us sit at a desk all day, leave at the same time and then go home at the same time.
another comment that shows up your inadequate life. not mine.
posted on 17/4/13
yes statman. thats because when you defended me you didnt start insulting the other person.
so no. not double standards. unlucky.
And no. i am not wrong. i am telling you a player will not be sent off for violent conduct for tripping off the ball. actions towards a referee are treated differently. your case does not prove me wrong in the slightest.
i think you should read back about what i actually said. educate yourself before bringing me this substandard argument.
posted on 17/4/13
oh. and how do you know where I am or what I am doing at 6.50 in the morning?
----------------
Perhaps by looking at your post which says it was made 12 hours and 22 minutes ago?
posted on 17/4/13
Raj
"oh. and how do you know where I am or what I am doing at 6.50 in the morning? not all of us sit at a desk all day, leave at the same time and then go home at the same time."
I looked on here this morning and the last comment, by you, was at 6.50am. When did I say anything about where you are?
"another comment that shows up your inadequate life. not mine."
Now now Raj. It's not my fault you woke up, rushed to your computer/lap top/phone and had to reply. There's no need to lash out. Oh and when did I say I worked in an office, kept the same hours etc?
posted on 17/4/13
oh. i forgot i was dealing with simpletons.
'When did I say anything about where you are'
er. here:
'good to know your first waking thought is us'
you then kindly repeated the suggested i woke up and rushed to reply.
i repeat. how do you know where i was or how long id been up even?
looks like red man and robin have got it wrong again.
oh dear oh dear!
posted on 17/4/13
He didnt say where you were though did he? It's pretty simple.
posted on 17/4/13
Raj
On the simple front I think you need to look a bit closer to home. I didn't mention where you are. I said you your first waking thought is of us. Did I speculate that you were at home, at work, or anywhere else? Nope. I will speculate now. Considering you don't post when at work, I'd imagine you were sat at home in your Fergie Jim jams, bashing away at the key board.
But your using your distracting techniques again. A standard tactic of yours.
It's not my fault you were posting on here at the crack of dawn. Something obviously irked you.
I guess we're getting it wrong like you did when you were casting aspersions based on the time of day we were posting on here?
posted on 17/4/13
This is just pathetic now
posted on 17/4/13
comment by Raj (U17528)
posted 1 hour, 32 minutes ago
yes statman. thats because when you defended me you didnt start insulting the other person.
so no. not double standards. unlucky.
And no. i am not wrong. i am telling you a player will not be sent off for violent conduct for tripping off the ball. actions towards a referee are treated differently. your case does not prove me wrong in the slightest.
i think you should read back about what i actually said. educate yourself before bringing me this substandard argument.
---------------
I know very well what you said. That a trip cannot under any circumstances be deemed a red card. You were wrong.
posted on 17/4/13
Raj
"another comment that shows up your inadequate life. not mine."
I'll ask again, when have I said I work in an office?
posted on 17/4/13
The early bird catches the Raj.
posted on 17/4/13
A Raj amongst the pigeons.
posted on 17/4/13
A Raj in the henhouse.
posted on 17/4/13
Inner City Raj
posted on 17/4/13
Raj Against The Machine.
posted on 17/4/13
Name the comedy tv personality catchphrase;
"Knowing me, knowing you, a Raaaaajjjjjjj"
Bet you can't. I'll give you a clue. Raj reminds me of him.
posted on 18/4/13
Alan Partraj.
posted on 18/4/13
Is this still on topic?
If it is never a red card in a million years, completely stupid from Rio and he deserved a yellow for it but as it wasn't spotted at the time and the FA don't give retrospective yellow cards you cannot expect anything to get done about it.
posted on 18/4/13
so red man. you said it was my first waking thought but i could have been at work.
riiiiiiight.
dear dear red man. yet another argument passes you by. you have no idea what time i get up or what my job is.
you tried mocking me and you got it badly wrong.
my comment about you working in an office was mocking your obvious daily routine. why else would you make such a prat of yourself regarding what time i wake up?
i notice you have left behind the off topic conversation we were having. you do that a lot don't you? lose an argument then try and find something else you can argue instead.
Page 86 of 152
87 | 88 | 89 | 90 | 91