cleverley
i'm glad that a lot of united fans are starting to see what he brings to the side (or lack of)
nani i don't think is a failure, there was a good 2 years or so he was tearing it apart on the wings
i still remember this, this was in his prime
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=past4m0aVP0
Cleverely is a useful player, can move the ball about and can link the play, but I dunno, dunno if he has the ability to take it further than a "useful player". Same with Welbeck now
Think Fergie's transfers are better than 1 hit for 1 miss. Nani's a decent enough player, but needs a lot of loving. Anderson... Could've been great but never looked after himself
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0A1MueHEGUI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BAVEaGRp1iw
I don't think Nani's a bad buy at that amount tbh. The other three, fair enough, but Anderson did come with a lot of hype and potential.
I don't think you can write off a manager as successful as Fergie by bringing up 5-6 bad transfers. Even if we do accept him being poor in the transfer market, that just elevates how good a manager he was - because he was able to win trophy after trophy with flops.
I dont think the United side of 10/11 was better than the arsenal side of 10/11 or even last season i thought player for player it was pretty equal.
just that united had a winners in their squad
"your lads don't deserve to be on the same pitch as my lads" Damned United
I dunno, I just can't see a midfield of
Beckham--Keane--Scholes--Giggs
Being bettered for a hell of a long time. Fergie's team dominated for two decades (and potentially going).
Ljungberg---Viera---Gilberto--Pires
how about spine of modern times?
Kightly---Henry---Milijas--Jarvis
Gotta have Keane and Scholes in the middle.
erm, make it more specific
of one season, not mixed
Scholesy had a hell of a shot on him, and was the best English passer of his generation/
Keane - Captain, aggression, and he could actually play, easy, lazy stereotype to see him just as a destroyer.
Giggs - Consistently one of the best (if not the best) LW for about 15 years.
Beckham - The best crosser ever seen in the PL, and set pieces of course - The fact that he's the weak link of the 4 shows how good the midfield is
I would do Lubo but tbf I don't really know the Revie players
I think arsenal and chelsea have the best midfield in england atm
Flamini < Ramires
Ramsey > Lampard (now obviously not at peak)
Walcott < Willian/Schurrle
Ozil > Oscar/Mata
Cazorla > Hazard IMO
Flamini < Yaya
Ramsey = Fernandinho
Walcott < Navas
Ozil > Silva
Cazorla > Nasri
Yaya > Ramires
Fernandinho > Lampard (Now not peak)
Navas < Willian/Schurrle
Silva < Mata/Oscar (If oscar then silva wins)
Nasri < Hazard
Sign in if you want to comment
The Championship League
Page 256 of 2375
257 | 258 | 259 | 260 | 261
posted on 10/11/13
cleverley
i'm glad that a lot of united fans are starting to see what he brings to the side (or lack of)
posted on 10/11/13
posted on 10/11/13
nani i don't think is a failure, there was a good 2 years or so he was tearing it apart on the wings
i still remember this, this was in his prime
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=past4m0aVP0
posted on 10/11/13
Cleverely is a useful player, can move the ball about and can link the play, but I dunno, dunno if he has the ability to take it further than a "useful player". Same with Welbeck now
Think Fergie's transfers are better than 1 hit for 1 miss. Nani's a decent enough player, but needs a lot of loving. Anderson... Could've been great but never looked after himself
posted on 10/11/13
posted on 10/11/13
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0A1MueHEGUI
posted on 10/11/13
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BAVEaGRp1iw
posted on 10/11/13
I don't think Nani's a bad buy at that amount tbh. The other three, fair enough, but Anderson did come with a lot of hype and potential.
I don't think you can write off a manager as successful as Fergie by bringing up 5-6 bad transfers. Even if we do accept him being poor in the transfer market, that just elevates how good a manager he was - because he was able to win trophy after trophy with flops.
posted on 10/11/13
posted on 10/11/13
I dont think the United side of 10/11 was better than the arsenal side of 10/11 or even last season i thought player for player it was pretty equal.
just that united had a winners in their squad
posted on 10/11/13
"your lads don't deserve to be on the same pitch as my lads" Damned United
I dunno, I just can't see a midfield of
Beckham--Keane--Scholes--Giggs
Being bettered for a hell of a long time. Fergie's team dominated for two decades (and potentially going).
posted on 10/11/13
posted on 10/11/13
Ljungberg---Viera---Gilberto--Pires
posted on 10/11/13
posted on 10/11/13
No it doesn't Lubo
posted on 10/11/13
how about spine of modern times?
posted on 10/11/13
Kightly---Henry---Milijas--Jarvis
posted on 10/11/13
What counts as modern??
posted on 10/11/13
last 15 years or so
posted on 10/11/13
Gotta have Keane and Scholes in the middle.
posted on 10/11/13
posted on 10/11/13
erm, make it more specific
of one season, not mixed
posted on 10/11/13
posted on 10/11/13
Scholesy had a hell of a shot on him, and was the best English passer of his generation/
Keane - Captain, aggression, and he could actually play, easy, lazy stereotype to see him just as a destroyer.
Giggs - Consistently one of the best (if not the best) LW for about 15 years.
Beckham - The best crosser ever seen in the PL, and set pieces of course - The fact that he's the weak link of the 4 shows how good the midfield is
I would do Lubo but tbf I don't really know the Revie players
posted on 10/11/13
I think arsenal and chelsea have the best midfield in england atm
Flamini < Ramires
Ramsey > Lampard (now obviously not at peak)
Walcott < Willian/Schurrle
Ozil > Oscar/Mata
Cazorla > Hazard IMO
Flamini < Yaya
Ramsey = Fernandinho
Walcott < Navas
Ozil > Silva
Cazorla > Nasri
Yaya > Ramires
Fernandinho > Lampard (Now not peak)
Navas < Willian/Schurrle
Silva < Mata/Oscar (If oscar then silva wins)
Nasri < Hazard
Page 256 of 2375
257 | 258 | 259 | 260 | 261