Wonder how Ferrari feel, next season they could have two drivers with dodgy backs. Alonso is still not confirmed for Austin :s
good evening nsix
believe KR surgery is only minor from what little i have read , and alonso"s was nothing more than a sore back when he gave the kerb a little biff at abu dhabi -
you can put your rent money on it that they will have the best chiropractor that the ferrari shilling can buy and both will be tip flucking top by the first winter test --
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
I've never understood why so many people rate Kovalainen. Never impressed at Renault or McLaren. He was a backmarker at best.
Think Valsecchi is the obvious choice. What's the point in having a 3rd driver if you're not going to use him when required? Luca Badoer excepted...
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
I would have thought d'Ambrosio would be the obvious choice for the last two races.
Hulkenburg best placed for the seat at Lotus, Maldonaldo erratic and inconsistent.
I wonder about all this.
At recent races Valsecchi has always been seen hanging about, almost as if Lotus were expecting Raikonnen not to show up, then there was the, "will he, won't he?" charade at the last race.
I would not want to work for a company that went back on its word, (what are the playing at?) or failed to meet its obligations and now it appears Raikonnen will not drive because of his back....
Hmmm.....
There's bigger issues right now, have you seen what next years nose cones look like :s
http://cdn.images.autosport.com/editorial/1384270378.jpg
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Page 1 of 1
First
Previous
1
Next
Latest
Sign in if you want to comment
Raikkonen to miss last two races
Page 1 of 1
posted on 10/11/13
Wonder how Ferrari feel, next season they could have two drivers with dodgy backs. Alonso is still not confirmed for Austin :s
posted on 10/11/13
Or d'Ambrosio
posted on 10/11/13
good evening nsix
believe KR surgery is only minor from what little i have read , and alonso"s was nothing more than a sore back when he gave the kerb a little biff at abu dhabi -
you can put your rent money on it that they will have the best chiropractor that the ferrari shilling can buy and both will be tip flucking top by the first winter test --
posted on 11/11/13
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 11/11/13
I've never understood why so many people rate Kovalainen. Never impressed at Renault or McLaren. He was a backmarker at best.
Think Valsecchi is the obvious choice. What's the point in having a 3rd driver if you're not going to use him when required? Luca Badoer excepted...
posted on 11/11/13
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 11/11/13
I would have thought d'Ambrosio would be the obvious choice for the last two races.
posted on 11/11/13
Hulkenburg best placed for the seat at Lotus, Maldonaldo erratic and inconsistent.
posted on 11/11/13
I wonder about all this.
At recent races Valsecchi has always been seen hanging about, almost as if Lotus were expecting Raikonnen not to show up, then there was the, "will he, won't he?" charade at the last race.
I would not want to work for a company that went back on its word, (what are the playing at?) or failed to meet its obligations and now it appears Raikonnen will not drive because of his back....
Hmmm.....
posted on 12/11/13
There's bigger issues right now, have you seen what next years nose cones look like :s
http://cdn.images.autosport.com/editorial/1384270378.jpg
posted on 12/11/13
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 14/11/13
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Page 1 of 1