Considering Hart played 50+ games for Shrewsbury before signing for you I'd hardly say he was one of your products, in the same way I wouldn't say Sterling is one of Liverpool's.
THIS HAS ME INCREDIBLY WOUND UP!!!!!!
(insert reaction you were looking for)
(mention you buying the title)
(mention your lack of history)
That just about covers it
Have a fantastic day.
Joe hart who is older than walcott signed for Man citt in 2006. The same year Walcott joined Arsenal. Yet he is apparently a city product and Walcott isn't an Arsenal product....
comment by ● (U4443)
Nah, no reaction. Just honest and seasoned debate. .
joe hart didn't come through man citys youth team and i doubt he will be your goalkeeper for long
he is dire
Hart was 19 when he signed for you. Does that really count as a youth product? If you're not letting us have Walcott and Ox then you ain't having Hart.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by FrimBöue (U12551)
-------------------------------------------------
The question is if the majority of your 1st team was bought, why do you accuse other teams of buying the league?
Is it because they bought better players?
City only have one proper youth product in the first team and that's Richards, Hart came from Shrewsbury and was loaned out to various clubs.
comment by 50Mill (U1147)
------------------------------------------------
Do you get my point?
Most of your 1st team players were bought. Why do you accuse others of buying the league?
For Liverpool (more recently)
Flanagan, Ibe, Wisdom, Kelly, Sterling (15 when he was brought to the academy), I could go on..
comment by mancinicity (U7179)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by 50Mill (U1147)
------------------------------------------------
Do you get my point?
Most of your 1st team players were bought. Why do you accuse others of buying the league?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No I don't get your point. There's a way to buy. Look at Bayern they do it right way as well as us. Your club has no class just like Chelsea. Completely soulless.
Ok lets all agree Hart came from Shrewsbury.
The question remains:
If most of Arsenal 1st team players were BOUGHT, can we all accuse them of buying the league if they win the PL this year?
Flanagan, Ibe, Wisdom, Kelly, Sterling (15 when he was brought to the academy), I could go on..
--
most of these players are rubbish and only played because liverpool are not up to much anymore though
hardlyy makes you a winner does it?
comment by mancinicity (U7179)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FrimBöue (U12551)
-------------------------------------------------
The question is if the majority of your 1st team was bought, why do you accuse other teams of buying the league?
Is it because they bought better players?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Alot of our players and a few of yours were bought bybus at a young age and we made them the players they are today.
Its obviously not always the case but your team is 90% established stars and 10% developed youngsters
I won't get into the petty squabbling, but I do want to know from a City fan of any of their potential future stars, currently in their youth/under 19's/under 21's? Are there any looking as though they might be the real deal?
Arsenal seem to have quite a few who could POTENTIALLY be superb. Although the majority of these are creative midfield-types. I think they are short on bringing through decent young defensive players.
Who on City's books could be a big-hitter in the not too distant future?
We bought our players with money we EARNED.
That's the difference.
comment by 50Mill (U1147)
-----------------------------------------
Please tell us. What is the Right way to buy a player?
What is it with City fans lately? They were doing so well at being respectable until this season.
City fans are fast becoming the idiots of ja606.
comment by Giröulski Alt-153 forever (U14971)
posted 1 minute ago
What is it with City fans lately? They were doing so well at being respectable until this season.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Always been dispicable caaants
comment by ● (U4443)
posted 11 seconds ago
We bought our players with money we EARNED.
That's the difference.
------------------------------------------------------
Oh, so your argument has shifted to the source of funding?
Well, this is another interesting angle.
Lets see! Who is in debt between City and Arsenal?
Do you realise if you are a penny in debt, that means you are living off borrowed funds? i.e above your means?
Good way to buy is the club making it's profits and using that rather than getting money from owners. It's cheating the way Chelsea and city are run. But alas why would you care. City fans and their cheating (buying officials too) are fast making them the most hated team in the land alongside utd and Chelsea.
So because I am asking for honest debate, we are all suddenly despicable?
I just want a clear the air debate about this issue of "buying the league". Nothing more.
If you attack because you have no valid points, then you are the ones being despicable.
no valid points
----------------------------------------
Much like your original article in which you claim Joe Hart was a City youth product
Sign in if you want to comment
Youth Product
Page 1 of 8
6 | 7 | 8
posted on 15/1/14
Considering Hart played 50+ games for Shrewsbury before signing for you I'd hardly say he was one of your products, in the same way I wouldn't say Sterling is one of Liverpool's.
posted on 15/1/14
THIS HAS ME INCREDIBLY WOUND UP!!!!!!
(insert reaction you were looking for)
(mention you buying the title)
(mention your lack of history)
That just about covers it
Have a fantastic day.
posted on 15/1/14
Joe hart who is older than walcott signed for Man citt in 2006. The same year Walcott joined Arsenal. Yet he is apparently a city product and Walcott isn't an Arsenal product....
posted on 15/1/14
comment by ● (U4443)
Nah, no reaction. Just honest and seasoned debate. .
posted on 15/1/14
joe hart didn't come through man citys youth team and i doubt he will be your goalkeeper for long
he is dire
posted on 15/1/14
Hart was 19 when he signed for you. Does that really count as a youth product? If you're not letting us have Walcott and Ox then you ain't having Hart.
posted on 15/1/14
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 15/1/14
comment by FrimBöue (U12551)
-------------------------------------------------
The question is if the majority of your 1st team was bought, why do you accuse other teams of buying the league?
Is it because they bought better players?
posted on 15/1/14
City only have one proper youth product in the first team and that's Richards, Hart came from Shrewsbury and was loaned out to various clubs.
posted on 15/1/14
comment by 50Mill (U1147)
------------------------------------------------
Do you get my point?
Most of your 1st team players were bought. Why do you accuse others of buying the league?
posted on 15/1/14
For Liverpool (more recently)
Flanagan, Ibe, Wisdom, Kelly, Sterling (15 when he was brought to the academy), I could go on..
posted on 15/1/14
comment by mancinicity (U7179)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by 50Mill (U1147)
------------------------------------------------
Do you get my point?
Most of your 1st team players were bought. Why do you accuse others of buying the league?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
No I don't get your point. There's a way to buy. Look at Bayern they do it right way as well as us. Your club has no class just like Chelsea. Completely soulless.
posted on 15/1/14
Ok lets all agree Hart came from Shrewsbury.
The question remains:
If most of Arsenal 1st team players were BOUGHT, can we all accuse them of buying the league if they win the PL this year?
posted on 15/1/14
Flanagan, Ibe, Wisdom, Kelly, Sterling (15 when he was brought to the academy), I could go on..
--
most of these players are rubbish and only played because liverpool are not up to much anymore though
hardlyy makes you a winner does it?
posted on 15/1/14
comment by mancinicity (U7179)
posted 1 minute ago
comment by FrimBöue (U12551)
-------------------------------------------------
The question is if the majority of your 1st team was bought, why do you accuse other teams of buying the league?
Is it because they bought better players?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Alot of our players and a few of yours were bought bybus at a young age and we made them the players they are today.
Its obviously not always the case but your team is 90% established stars and 10% developed youngsters
posted on 15/1/14
I won't get into the petty squabbling, but I do want to know from a City fan of any of their potential future stars, currently in their youth/under 19's/under 21's? Are there any looking as though they might be the real deal?
Arsenal seem to have quite a few who could POTENTIALLY be superb. Although the majority of these are creative midfield-types. I think they are short on bringing through decent young defensive players.
Who on City's books could be a big-hitter in the not too distant future?
posted on 15/1/14
We bought our players with money we EARNED.
That's the difference.
posted on 15/1/14
comment by 50Mill (U1147)
-----------------------------------------
Please tell us. What is the Right way to buy a player?
posted on 15/1/14
What is it with City fans lately? They were doing so well at being respectable until this season.
posted on 15/1/14
City fans are fast becoming the idiots of ja606.
posted on 15/1/14
comment by Giröulski Alt-153 forever (U14971)
posted 1 minute ago
What is it with City fans lately? They were doing so well at being respectable until this season.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Always been dispicable caaants
posted on 15/1/14
comment by ● (U4443)
posted 11 seconds ago
We bought our players with money we EARNED.
That's the difference.
------------------------------------------------------
Oh, so your argument has shifted to the source of funding?
Well, this is another interesting angle.
Lets see! Who is in debt between City and Arsenal?
Do you realise if you are a penny in debt, that means you are living off borrowed funds? i.e above your means?
posted on 15/1/14
Good way to buy is the club making it's profits and using that rather than getting money from owners. It's cheating the way Chelsea and city are run. But alas why would you care. City fans and their cheating (buying officials too) are fast making them the most hated team in the land alongside utd and Chelsea.
posted on 15/1/14
So because I am asking for honest debate, we are all suddenly despicable?
I just want a clear the air debate about this issue of "buying the league". Nothing more.
If you attack because you have no valid points, then you are the ones being despicable.
posted on 15/1/14
no valid points
----------------------------------------
Much like your original article in which you claim Joe Hart was a City youth product
Page 1 of 8
6 | 7 | 8