Blóódy Hell, reading War and Peace would be quicker.

And RVLP is a striker ??

RVLP is our second best striker, considering our style of play. He'll be a striker within three years. I'm not surprised you don't see it Wolfgang, molineux mix hasn't told you that information yet.

Its on Wikipedia that he's also a striker. I remember reading it when we first signed him. So you can stop your arrogant 'I noticed this first' rubbish.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rajiv_van_La_Parra

I'll stop that rubbish when you come up with something useful, you sheep

Don't talk to Tam like that you cad.

Nothing anyone on here says or does is of any use though. You are not going to influence any decision Jackett or the Wolves board make. Everything anyone says is opinion or speculation which, in your case, you use to inflate your ego.

OOOhhh

Feisty old start to the day ladies. Over tired maybe? Mrs on a blob week ? Too many blue smarties ?

First week back after a holiday Oldgoldilox. Bound to be agitated.

Tam, of course it's my opinion. I haven't said it was anything else. Maybe forums aren't for you.

I don't have a problem with the article or your opinions. I actually thought it was quite a well written article, I read all of it and whilst I may not agree with some things, as there is reasoning behind why you think that, I think its a fair enough assessment.

It was the attitude after that I took exception to.

Well your going to get attitude from posters when you lead out with the statement that I'm being arrogant after writing what you say is a fair assessment. I expect it from Wolfgang.

If you don't want to read the article, I'm not forcing you to.

And to the one star merchant...

You need to know that The Pundit has a particular set of skills that he will use to hunt you down. When I do, and I will, I will leave you with a stump for a hand so you can't click a mouse again.

The overall message behind the verbage I almost agree with but to say that we are no too light on strikers is ridiculous. As Kenny has been, and is now, looking to bring one in he clearly agrees with me.

Threats to other posters

Fortunately most people will understand what I said. Which is we are light on quality in that area but not on numbers.

Kenny wouldn't agree with you Wolfgang because as Tam says, he doesn't read mol mix.

Pundit, get used to the 1 star merchants. They appear all the time on my articles. They are too scared to identify themselves and hide behind the security of the internet.

A well thought out article which will draw a few comments from posters who have a different opinion. But that's fine and it's what these forums are all about.

I think you can take Foley out of your options at LB tho'.

Have a 4 from me.

It's a shame that Wolfgang allows his insecurities to surface to try and de-rail threads.

Anything over 100 words and he has a wobble and claims War and Peace.

Fack me I'm bored. Someone makes a Wolves vs Jordan Rhodes article with various irrelevant stats and figures.

Boredom and a pundit article !
And I always find them so riveting which is why I always give them 1 star ......ooops !

We still need another striker.

Nice read though Pundit

I don't think I have really rated an article unless it uses the rating as a medium for voting on a topic. I also don't think I have ever used a star rating to gauge whether an article is any good. So it seems like a bit of a pointless feature and nothing to get too upset about.

I agree I think we need a new striker. That is mainly because I do not think that Clarke will either be given the chance or prove to be adequate cover for Dicko.

I think it's a little early to declare RVLP as our second best striker given he's only played a handful of games on the wing and hasn't scored yet.

I also disagree with sending our first choice CB reserve out on loan. the four players for each position is also misleading when talking about CBs...because we generally need two in each game. meaning we have two reserves. so if our two first choice CBs are injured/suspended we have no back ups in CB on the bench. on top of which, ricketts was poor as CB in the third division and doesn't inspire me as cover outside of the full back places.

the four players for each position is also misleading when talking about CBs...because we generally need two in each game. meaning we have two reserves. so if our two first choice CBs are injured/suspended we have no back ups in CB on the bench.
-------------------------------------------------------

Where to start with this?...
Ricketts is our reserve centre back. Unlikely two are out at once, but even in that extreme we're covered.
If you'd read the article you'd have noted I said Ebanks going would depend on a CB coming in.

I won't bother in the future.
I'll just look forward to reading Wolfgang and tamewolf's riveting threads.

Pundit, if you count names only once, and exclude Foley, who's been told to find another club, you've actually only got seven players to cover RB, CB and LB - Doherty, Ricketts, Ebanks-Landell, Baath, Stearman, Golbourne and Rowe. That number comes down to six if Rowe is going to be used in MF. Most coaches would like to have two players for each position, so I think you actually need to get at least one more defender in, and maybe two.