Nobody has suggested any other reason other than controlled demolition which is absurd in my view for reasons I stated above.
------------------------------
I keep mentioning Dr Judy Wood on this thread as she is a former professor of mechanical engineering who puts forward a very interesting theory.
Maybe a technology that isn't yet in the public domain was used to bring down the towers.
Why does it necessarily have to be something that everyone knows about or is common knowledge?
WTC 7 was not hit by an aeroplane, it had severe damage on its south side from falling debris from the towers and had been burning for hours.
-----------------------------
So why did Building 7 fall in perfect symmetry straight down into it's own footprint then?
If the damage was to one side of it then if it was going to collapse it would have collapsed at an angle.
Building 7 didn't do that though did it.
When a building is demolished a lot of work has to go into making sure that the building falls straight down as simple physics tells you that a building will normally heavily lean to one side or another if it does collapse of it's own accord.
What made Building 7 collapse as perfectly as it did ?
I have yet to hear a reasonable answer.
On the anniversary of the 2 towers.........
Page 8 of 8
6 | 7 | 8
posted on 12/9/14
Nobody has suggested any other reason other than controlled demolition which is absurd in my view for reasons I stated above.
------------------------------
I keep mentioning Dr Judy Wood on this thread as she is a former professor of mechanical engineering who puts forward a very interesting theory.
Maybe a technology that isn't yet in the public domain was used to bring down the towers.
Why does it necessarily have to be something that everyone knows about or is common knowledge?
posted on 12/9/14
WTC 7 was not hit by an aeroplane, it had severe damage on its south side from falling debris from the towers and had been burning for hours.
-----------------------------
So why did Building 7 fall in perfect symmetry straight down into it's own footprint then?
If the damage was to one side of it then if it was going to collapse it would have collapsed at an angle.
Building 7 didn't do that though did it.
When a building is demolished a lot of work has to go into making sure that the building falls straight down as simple physics tells you that a building will normally heavily lean to one side or another if it does collapse of it's own accord.
What made Building 7 collapse as perfectly as it did ?
I have yet to hear a reasonable answer.
Page 8 of 8
6 | 7 | 8