Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

junction8,

tbf there are a few about who act like....right i've spoken...topic discussion over.

==================

Agreed....

The Ace Face doesn't do opinion based debate - his view on things are "fact" and anything else is <insert foul mouthed swear word here>.

Have a day off chicken

Edin,

Did you read the article from the start?

I did, but every article you are on involves an argument. I thought on a weekend that may change.

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

You talking about 606v2 Bill?

------------------------------------------

Not sure if there is some hidden meaning in that, Ace, but on the understanding it is a serious question, then yes, version whatever.

I am talking about a site where discussion under one heading is just that, under one heading (thread). Cut out all the boring duplication because posters want to make a point, but they want to be sure that it is posted where it will be seen.

If I have some more thoughts on Tim Sherwood as manager, it is no good me looking up the old threads on him and commenting there because no one would see it. But if it was brought to the top, then it would be immediately apparent that another comment had been made and it would be read. It saves me having to start a new thread, just to make a comment on something that has occurred that day.

But its real value would be the cutting out of all the duplicate threads that people start just because they want their comments to be read and not lost. Over time, each subject would be aired and discussed to perhaps some level of concensus.

Same with you really ace, it's a Saturday. Leave your handbag at work.

Edinspur

I did, but every article you are on involves an argument. I thought on a weekend that may change.

=============

Have you ever thought it may be better to target the instigator rather than the retaliator? that would make far more sense.

Well, it is to anyone who isn't scared of taking the wrath of anyone in the JA clique...

I know, must be hard work being such a pompous, conceited, sanctimonious, pious, self-righteous, petty, arrogant, tedious tósser 365 days a year. At least he's (Mr) consistent with it tho

===========

Ooh someone's tired .

Did your Mum bring home another special Uncle again and keep you up all night?

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

which is why I stopped posting there and migrated here.

===============

Or more likely another forum ban..

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

The one player we haven't really been linked with but whom id love to have at spurs is Nzonzi from Stoke.

He is a monster at cm, tall athletic, strong and has goals to his game and would compliment Bentaleb perfectly.

comment by The Ace Face (U18814)
posted 3 minutes ago
No Bill I mean http://www.606v2.com - one of the other BBC breakaway sites. It uses a model more or less identical to what you describe - threads get bumped when they're commented on, long running threads are separated into 'sticky' sections away from the main forum pages, and there are sections for general chat, a politics board, TV board, music board etc. It was commandeered by the boxing & rugby fans mostly and doesn't have much footy chat, whereas Ja is much better for footy which is why I stopped posting there and migrated here.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh, right, wasn't aware of that site. But the model of bumping threads is what I am advocating, but not mixing up all different aspects of sports or all manner of discussion points under the sun.

Keep the site as it is now, which is excellent, separate sports, and in the case of football, separate club sections.

But simply allow someone to comment on an old thread which would be brought to the top in the format now enjoyed by the site.

I seetled here because it thought it was the best of the breakaway bbc 606 sites available. I want to keep all the good bits, just embellish what I see as detrimental to good discussion.

comment by Dont cry for me Argentina we have Pochetinno and Lamela (formely avb easy as 123) (U17539)
posted 42 seconds ago
The one player we haven't really been linked with but whom id love to have at spurs is Nzonzi from Stoke.

He is a monster at cm, tall athletic, strong and has goals to his game and would compliment Bentaleb perfectly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A few posters have now mentioned him and from the little I've seen of him he looks decent but not sure that he's on our radar tbh.

I was the first

The Ace,

Err no, still use their boxing forum as it's busier than the one here

=====================

Are you still looking for ways to fight your way out of that paper bag?

comment by Edinspur (U1109)
posted 15 seconds ago
I was the first
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Chronic was

No I was last December fam

comment by Edinspur (U1109)
posted 2 minutes ago
No I was last December fam
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Link or never happened