comment by TEG. (U15242)
posted 29 minutes ago
Alright Iwas.
Jeremy Corbyn certainly doesn't fit in with the NWO plans (just like Abraham Lincoln, JFK, John Smith and Robin Cook, etc, etc) and that is why you will see constant attacks on him from the mainstream media.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well, that and the fact that he’s a complete loon.
In other news, Cloughie is being linked in the DET with the vacant job @ Rotherham
comment by RamsfanBaz. Since I was young... (U2480)
posted 11 seconds ago
In other news, Cloughie is being linked in the DET with the vacant job @ Rotherham
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is Hugh Hefner the Rotherham chairman..? He seems to have the same proclivity for surrounding himself with massive țẁats.
comment by TEG. (U15242)
posted 25 seconds ago
Why is he, 666?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For a start he wants to abolish the benefits cap, essentially granting free reign to the feckless to continue to spew welfare tokens out every 9 months regardless of their inability to feed, clothe, educate or otherwise raise said tokens.
It's not sponsoring they need, it's sterilising.
Don't take any notice of 666, TEG. He lives under a bridge and we are all waiting for the billy goat gruff.
On another note, your mates the Rothchild's are mentioned here. Didn't seem such a bad old stick to me.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-34396939
I seldom agree with 666, but on this I do.
Corbyn is a total idiot who, were it not for the other parties quite brilliantly abusing the Labour party voting system, wouldnt have had a cats chance in hell of getting in.
Lincoln, JFK, Smith and Cook are all dead you know. Maybe TEG is actually on to something here. If it was just one or two of them then maybe it could be coincidence but all four????
Certainly makes you think.
You really believe that Peeder, about other parties abusing the system. Maybe the previously disenfranchised by our electoral system, i.e. the working class young, finally saw someone who might take notice of them. What is more with our electoral system you only need 25% of the electorate to vote for you and you can form a government so if he can attract a constituency of the left who are prepared to go out and vote then he could easily form the next government.
The latest conspiracy theory is that big pharma is murdering alternative medicine practioners. After all they are such a threat to the NWO.
You Corbyn badgers should take your heads out of your backsides and start to look up at the massive tax dodges being done by the rich at our expense rather than bashing those most in need in our society. There are many thousands who actually need benefit not just the Daily Mail Benefit Street lot. You should be ashamed of yourselves.
They do say the richest 1% pay 30% of the taxes. If you clobber them where will we get the money from?
I agree with Peeder and 666!
Let's confuse those 'in need' with those 'in want'; I believe the ideology underpinning the creation of a welfare state is a great one, however the implementation of it has gone to crap. It shouldn't be a career choice for the feckless but it absolutely is. Every working family has to make economic choices regarding the size of their family, why should those unwilling to work be so unencumbered by the realities that the rest of us have to consider? Corbyn's a ķņob.
Bollix - again I agree with 666. The benefits sytem in this country needs a total overhaul so that those who have a genuine need for benefits receive them, whereas those who make a conscious decison to abuse the current system won't get anything in the future.
The wealthiest may pay 30% of the tax but hold a considerable higher portion of the available wealth and this proportion is growing so they obviously aren't being taxed sufficiently.
What are you suggesting about benefits. The vast majority of people are on benefit not out of choice but because of circumstances. Those who abuse the system generally do so by fraudulent means so it is up the people administering the sysytem to find these. Living on benefits is hardly living the high life despite what the tabloid press might say.
"The vast majority of people are on benefit not out of choice but because of circumstances."
Subjective crap.
comment by #JeSuis666 (U11795)
posted 1 hour, 19 minutes ago
Let's confuse those 'in need' with those 'in want'; I believe the ideology underpinning the creation of a welfare state is a great one, however the implementation of it has gone to crap. It shouldn't be a career choice for the feckless but it absolutely is. Every working family has to make economic choices regarding the size of their family, why should those unwilling to work be so unencumbered by the realities that the rest of us have to consider? Corbyn's a ķņob.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tax dodger denier.
Rich mans toadie.
comment by I'm not Spartacus. and definitely not Vidal (U4603)
posted 12 minutes ago
The wealthiest may pay 30% of the tax but hold a considerable higher portion of the available wealth and this proportion is growing so they obviously aren't being taxed sufficiently.
What are you suggesting about benefits. The vast majority of people are on benefit not out of choice but because of circumstances. Those who abuse the system generally do so by fraudulent means so it is up the people administering the sysytem to find these. Living on benefits is hardly living the high life despite what the tabloid press might say.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
666 Peeder and VC are blind to it. They only see what appears on the front page of the Daily Mail. They never look up.
Why should the CEO of a large organisation earn 10s of millions of pounds a year. Here's a radical idea, a maximum wage of £500k per year. If you want to earn more then start your own company.
comment by Iwaslevel - Carry On Kuwait (U4836)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by I'm not Spartacus. and definitely not Vidal (U4603)
posted 12 minutes ago
The wealthiest may pay 30% of the tax but hold a considerable higher portion of the available wealth and this proportion is growing so they obviously aren't being taxed sufficiently.
What are you suggesting about benefits. The vast majority of people are on benefit not out of choice but because of circumstances. Those who abuse the system generally do so by fraudulent means so it is up the people administering the sysytem to find these. Living on benefits is hardly living the high life despite what the tabloid press might say.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
666 Peeder and VC are blind to it. They only see what appears on the front page of the Daily Mail. They never look up.
Why should the CEO of a large organisation earn 10s of millions of pounds a year. Here's a radical idea, a maximum wage of £500k per year. If you want to earn more then start your own company.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Any other great ideas to drive business and revenue outside of this country, Iwas? Perhaps floggings, with every £ over your notional amount equalling one public lash?
I do wonder why they let your sort have a vote when you clearly can't grasp even the fundamentals.
Yes, stop the obsession with growth. The only reason it exists is to keep the CEOs in massive salaries.
Iwas - NEVER call me a Daily Mail reader. I detest that publication.
Lets get this straight - I know many people of benefits of various sorts. Some totally deserve it, others clearly dont. They are all receiving benefits because their circumstances allow them to claim them BUT some of them chose those circumstances. Some didnt chose the circumstances that allowed them to claim originally, but have conveniently forgotten to let anyone know their circumstances have changed.
Its not the concept that is flawed - its the system and the fact that many people are inherently dishonest.
Why should tax payers have to pay even more in taxes just so that people can be employed to find the benefit cheats who, of course, never get made to repay the money they have stolen.
And why shouldnt someone earn £10m if they are running a company that pays its taxes and makes a positive contribution to the financial well being of the world economy?
Sorry Peeder, you're not a Daily mail reader but you don't half write like a Daily Mail journalist.
Many sentences attacking the poor and one sentence praising the greedy.
You need to get a grip if you think they are benefiting society more by earning £10m a year basic than they would earning £500k a year max. Are they benefiting society by merging two perfectly profitable businesses and closing one?
comment by #JeSuis666 (U11795)
posted 51 minutes ago
comment by Iwaslevel - Carry On Kuwait (U4836)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by I'm not Spartacus. and definitely not Vidal (U4603)
posted 12 minutes ago
The wealthiest may pay 30% of the tax but hold a considerable higher portion of the available wealth and this proportion is growing so they obviously aren't being taxed sufficiently.
What are you suggesting about benefits. The vast majority of people are on benefit not out of choice but because of circumstances. Those who abuse the system generally do so by fraudulent means so it is up the people administering the sysytem to find these. Living on benefits is hardly living the high life despite what the tabloid press might say.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
666 Peeder and VC are blind to it. They only see what appears on the front page of the Daily Mail. They never look up.
Why should the CEO of a large organisation earn 10s of millions of pounds a year. Here's a radical idea, a maximum wage of £500k per year. If you want to earn more then start your own company.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Any other great ideas to drive business and revenue outside of this country, Iwas? Perhaps floggings, with every £ over your notional amount equalling one public lash?
I do wonder why they let your sort have a vote when you clearly can't grasp even the fundamentals.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You just keep gawping at those fancy cars as they drive by.
Iwas - I cant think of a single case where 2 "perfectly profitable" businesses were merged. In every case I can think of one poorly (or at least less efficeintly) run business was taken over by another more successful business allowing costs to be cut and the new combined business to run more efficiently, so helping to secure the long term output of our country and secure the jobs that remain.
You've got to be joking.
The next one will be when INBev buy Millar to create the biggest brewery on earth. People will lose their jobs when they have worked hard to create a profitable business.
Take your blinkers off.
Sign in if you want to comment
Happy Anniversary Everybody!
Page 3 of 7
6 | 7
posted on 30/9/15
comment by TEG. (U15242)
posted 29 minutes ago
Alright Iwas.
Jeremy Corbyn certainly doesn't fit in with the NWO plans (just like Abraham Lincoln, JFK, John Smith and Robin Cook, etc, etc) and that is why you will see constant attacks on him from the mainstream media.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Well, that and the fact that he’s a complete loon.
posted on 30/9/15
In other news, Cloughie is being linked in the DET with the vacant job @ Rotherham
posted on 30/9/15
Why is he, 666?
posted on 30/9/15
comment by RamsfanBaz. Since I was young... (U2480)
posted 11 seconds ago
In other news, Cloughie is being linked in the DET with the vacant job @ Rotherham
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is Hugh Hefner the Rotherham chairman..? He seems to have the same proclivity for surrounding himself with massive țẁats.
posted on 30/9/15
comment by TEG. (U15242)
posted 25 seconds ago
Why is he, 666?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For a start he wants to abolish the benefits cap, essentially granting free reign to the feckless to continue to spew welfare tokens out every 9 months regardless of their inability to feed, clothe, educate or otherwise raise said tokens.
It's not sponsoring they need, it's sterilising.
posted on 30/9/15
Don't take any notice of 666, TEG. He lives under a bridge and we are all waiting for the billy goat gruff.
On another note, your mates the Rothchild's are mentioned here. Didn't seem such a bad old stick to me.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-34396939
posted on 30/9/15
I seldom agree with 666, but on this I do.
Corbyn is a total idiot who, were it not for the other parties quite brilliantly abusing the Labour party voting system, wouldnt have had a cats chance in hell of getting in.
posted on 30/9/15
Lincoln, JFK, Smith and Cook are all dead you know. Maybe TEG is actually on to something here. If it was just one or two of them then maybe it could be coincidence but all four????
Certainly makes you think.
posted on 30/9/15
You really believe that Peeder, about other parties abusing the system. Maybe the previously disenfranchised by our electoral system, i.e. the working class young, finally saw someone who might take notice of them. What is more with our electoral system you only need 25% of the electorate to vote for you and you can form a government so if he can attract a constituency of the left who are prepared to go out and vote then he could easily form the next government.
The latest conspiracy theory is that big pharma is murdering alternative medicine practioners. After all they are such a threat to the NWO.
posted on 30/9/15
You Corbyn badgers should take your heads out of your backsides and start to look up at the massive tax dodges being done by the rich at our expense rather than bashing those most in need in our society. There are many thousands who actually need benefit not just the Daily Mail Benefit Street lot. You should be ashamed of yourselves.
posted on 30/9/15
They do say the richest 1% pay 30% of the taxes. If you clobber them where will we get the money from?
I agree with Peeder and 666!
posted on 30/9/15
Let's confuse those 'in need' with those 'in want'; I believe the ideology underpinning the creation of a welfare state is a great one, however the implementation of it has gone to crap. It shouldn't be a career choice for the feckless but it absolutely is. Every working family has to make economic choices regarding the size of their family, why should those unwilling to work be so unencumbered by the realities that the rest of us have to consider? Corbyn's a ķņob.
posted on 30/9/15
Bollix - again I agree with 666. The benefits sytem in this country needs a total overhaul so that those who have a genuine need for benefits receive them, whereas those who make a conscious decison to abuse the current system won't get anything in the future.
posted on 30/9/15
The wealthiest may pay 30% of the tax but hold a considerable higher portion of the available wealth and this proportion is growing so they obviously aren't being taxed sufficiently.
What are you suggesting about benefits. The vast majority of people are on benefit not out of choice but because of circumstances. Those who abuse the system generally do so by fraudulent means so it is up the people administering the sysytem to find these. Living on benefits is hardly living the high life despite what the tabloid press might say.
posted on 30/9/15
"The vast majority of people are on benefit not out of choice but because of circumstances."
Subjective crap.
posted on 30/9/15
comment by #JeSuis666 (U11795)
posted 1 hour, 19 minutes ago
Let's confuse those 'in need' with those 'in want'; I believe the ideology underpinning the creation of a welfare state is a great one, however the implementation of it has gone to crap. It shouldn't be a career choice for the feckless but it absolutely is. Every working family has to make economic choices regarding the size of their family, why should those unwilling to work be so unencumbered by the realities that the rest of us have to consider? Corbyn's a ķņob.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tax dodger denier.
Rich mans toadie.
posted on 30/9/15
comment by I'm not Spartacus. and definitely not Vidal (U4603)
posted 12 minutes ago
The wealthiest may pay 30% of the tax but hold a considerable higher portion of the available wealth and this proportion is growing so they obviously aren't being taxed sufficiently.
What are you suggesting about benefits. The vast majority of people are on benefit not out of choice but because of circumstances. Those who abuse the system generally do so by fraudulent means so it is up the people administering the sysytem to find these. Living on benefits is hardly living the high life despite what the tabloid press might say.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
666 Peeder and VC are blind to it. They only see what appears on the front page of the Daily Mail. They never look up.
Why should the CEO of a large organisation earn 10s of millions of pounds a year. Here's a radical idea, a maximum wage of £500k per year. If you want to earn more then start your own company.
posted on 30/9/15
comment by Iwaslevel - Carry On Kuwait (U4836)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by I'm not Spartacus. and definitely not Vidal (U4603)
posted 12 minutes ago
The wealthiest may pay 30% of the tax but hold a considerable higher portion of the available wealth and this proportion is growing so they obviously aren't being taxed sufficiently.
What are you suggesting about benefits. The vast majority of people are on benefit not out of choice but because of circumstances. Those who abuse the system generally do so by fraudulent means so it is up the people administering the sysytem to find these. Living on benefits is hardly living the high life despite what the tabloid press might say.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
666 Peeder and VC are blind to it. They only see what appears on the front page of the Daily Mail. They never look up.
Why should the CEO of a large organisation earn 10s of millions of pounds a year. Here's a radical idea, a maximum wage of £500k per year. If you want to earn more then start your own company.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Any other great ideas to drive business and revenue outside of this country, Iwas? Perhaps floggings, with every £ over your notional amount equalling one public lash?
I do wonder why they let your sort have a vote when you clearly can't grasp even the fundamentals.
posted on 30/9/15
Yes, stop the obsession with growth. The only reason it exists is to keep the CEOs in massive salaries.
posted on 30/9/15
Iwas - NEVER call me a Daily Mail reader. I detest that publication.
Lets get this straight - I know many people of benefits of various sorts. Some totally deserve it, others clearly dont. They are all receiving benefits because their circumstances allow them to claim them BUT some of them chose those circumstances. Some didnt chose the circumstances that allowed them to claim originally, but have conveniently forgotten to let anyone know their circumstances have changed.
Its not the concept that is flawed - its the system and the fact that many people are inherently dishonest.
Why should tax payers have to pay even more in taxes just so that people can be employed to find the benefit cheats who, of course, never get made to repay the money they have stolen.
And why shouldnt someone earn £10m if they are running a company that pays its taxes and makes a positive contribution to the financial well being of the world economy?
posted on 30/9/15
Sorry Peeder, you're not a Daily mail reader but you don't half write like a Daily Mail journalist.
Many sentences attacking the poor and one sentence praising the greedy.
You need to get a grip if you think they are benefiting society more by earning £10m a year basic than they would earning £500k a year max. Are they benefiting society by merging two perfectly profitable businesses and closing one?
posted on 30/9/15
comment by #JeSuis666 (U11795)
posted 51 minutes ago
comment by Iwaslevel - Carry On Kuwait (U4836)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by I'm not Spartacus. and definitely not Vidal (U4603)
posted 12 minutes ago
The wealthiest may pay 30% of the tax but hold a considerable higher portion of the available wealth and this proportion is growing so they obviously aren't being taxed sufficiently.
What are you suggesting about benefits. The vast majority of people are on benefit not out of choice but because of circumstances. Those who abuse the system generally do so by fraudulent means so it is up the people administering the sysytem to find these. Living on benefits is hardly living the high life despite what the tabloid press might say.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
666 Peeder and VC are blind to it. They only see what appears on the front page of the Daily Mail. They never look up.
Why should the CEO of a large organisation earn 10s of millions of pounds a year. Here's a radical idea, a maximum wage of £500k per year. If you want to earn more then start your own company.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Any other great ideas to drive business and revenue outside of this country, Iwas? Perhaps floggings, with every £ over your notional amount equalling one public lash?
I do wonder why they let your sort have a vote when you clearly can't grasp even the fundamentals.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You just keep gawping at those fancy cars as they drive by.
posted on 30/9/15
Iwas - I cant think of a single case where 2 "perfectly profitable" businesses were merged. In every case I can think of one poorly (or at least less efficeintly) run business was taken over by another more successful business allowing costs to be cut and the new combined business to run more efficiently, so helping to secure the long term output of our country and secure the jobs that remain.
posted on 30/9/15
posted on 30/9/15
You've got to be joking.
The next one will be when INBev buy Millar to create the biggest brewery on earth. People will lose their jobs when they have worked hard to create a profitable business.
Take your blinkers off.
Page 3 of 7
6 | 7