How would Corbyn be dangerous and who to?**
Not enough time this evening to list how dangerous he would be and you wouldnt agree anyway, I can tell you by your replies, when Cameron is the other option I can see why people get sucked in by this guy
So you think a socialist who wants a fair society**
The problem with socialism is that you run out of other people's money to spend
Robb
There are many more people in the world more dangerous than Trump. Fatboy with the haircut in N Korea is probably top of the list. Putin not far behind.
comment by Bobby Dazzler (U1449)
posted 5 minutes ago
How would Corbyn be dangerous and who to?
..................
The British public.
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 0 seconds ago
comment by Bobby Dazzler (U1449)
posted 5 minutes ago
How would Corbyn be dangerous and who to?
..................
The British public.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Come on then
That's actually a good shout VC, Kim Jong-Un is Stalin in disguise.
comment by yeah yeah (U17250)
posted 14 seconds ago
How would Corbyn be dangerous and who to?**
Not enough time this evening to list how dangerous he would be and you wouldnt agree anyway, I can tell you by your replies, when Cameron is the other option I can see why people get sucked in by this guy
====================
At best you'll trot out the usual misinterpretations of his positions on things, so probably best not bother. There's enough Corbyn-smearing going on across the entire media spectrum (including an apparently quite overt campaign of undermining from the BBC, See: http://www.medialens.org/index.php/alerts/alert-archive/2016/810-our-only-fear-was-that-he-might-pull-his-punches-bbc-caught-manipulating-the-news.html and http://www.medialens.org/index.php/alerts/alert-archive/2015/803-nuclear-war-and-corbyn-the-fury-and-the-farce.html and http://www.medialens.org/index.php/alerts/alert-archive/2015/800-corbyn-and-the-end-of-time-the-crisis-of-democracy.html)
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Bobby Dazzler (U1449)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 0 seconds ago
comment by Bobby Dazzler (U1449)
posted 5 minutes ago
How would Corbyn be dangerous and who to?
..................
The British public.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Come on then
...............
Come on then what?
You were about to explain how Corbyn would be dangerous to the British public
Tomkins
Not as dangerous as Corbyn. Who wants to scrap our great country's defence entirely and pray for world peace
You`ve been reading too many comics mate. Amazing how the right wing press can brainwash so many people with nonsense about Jeremy Corbyn.
If you think Nuclear Weapons are a great country`s defence, then you are about as stupid as the press that perpetrate the same nonsense.
At best you'll trot out the usual misinterpretations of his positions on things**
It's only viewed as a misinterpretation if you dont agree with it, but for the Jeremy fans like yourself it would clearly be a waste of time, I will take great pleasure in knowing that I wasn't one of the people that were sucked in by him, meanwhile here is a letter I've received from Berbaking from JA606
comment by TUX (U5315)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Stretford_Ender85 (U10955)
posted 3 minutes ago
Its not a deterrent if you fire in retaliation and if you fire first, you're the lunatic.
Meaning? Nuclear deterrents are a waste of money.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
5* 's
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Really? The point of having one is that you will never HAVE to retaliate. Because nobody will fire at you, knowing you COULD retaliate. That's what makes it a deterrent.
Come on then what?**
This is where you are supposed to be elaborating on your comment so he can tell you how wrong you are and why
Imagine Sharia Law under Corbyn...boy
Trump is a shameless politician with no morals, who'd do anything to get in to power. I've read somewhere that he used to have pro immigration policies few years ago. When that didnt quite work on public, he made a complete U turn and started pandering to the idiotic redneck base in US.
As someone said earlier, he is the most dangerous person in the world at the moment because he doesnt have any principles and he will shameless pander to his vote base if he gets the power
I don't think there's that many dumb americans
****
I almost wet myself when I read that
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/10/04/12/2D114B1F00000578-0-image-m-96_1443957873638.jpg
The most dangerous man alive.
Can we stay on track please troops.
Donald Trump, wazzock or statesman?
t's only viewed as a misinterpretation if you dont agree with it
------------------------
Not at all. All about evidence.
I scarcely knew who he was before he started making headway in the leadership race.
I've also provided three pieces of analysis from Media Lens, who have produced the leading academic analysis and study of the British press for nearly decades.
If you can provide evidence for your apparent claims, go for it.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
As Commander and Chief he has the final say if America was ever to go to war. Not even the Senate can save our ar5es...Basically we're f00ked if he was ever to get in. A Ronald Regan, Arnold Schwarzenegger kind celebrity voting could be on the cards.
comment by yeah yeah (U17250)
posted 1 minute ago
Come on then what?**
This is where you are supposed to be elaborating on your comment so he can tell you how wrong you are and why
Imagine Sharia Law under Corbyn...boy
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You still don't actually know what Sharia means do you?
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Clockwork Red (U4892)
Really? The point of having one is that you will never HAVE to retaliate. Because nobody will fire at you, knowing you COULD retaliate. That's what makes it a deterrent.
---------------------------
Flawed on every level. I've already posted this on this thread but people don't much like changing their minds but I'll give it a go anyway:
http://www.sgr.org.uk/resources/trident-deterrence-and-uk-security
Sign in if you want to comment
Is Donald Trump a
Page 2 of 30
6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10
posted on 19/1/16
How would Corbyn be dangerous and who to?**
Not enough time this evening to list how dangerous he would be and you wouldnt agree anyway, I can tell you by your replies, when Cameron is the other option I can see why people get sucked in by this guy
posted on 19/1/16
belmonty
Spot on.
posted on 19/1/16
So you think a socialist who wants a fair society**
The problem with socialism is that you run out of other people's money to spend
posted on 19/1/16
Robb
There are many more people in the world more dangerous than Trump. Fatboy with the haircut in N Korea is probably top of the list. Putin not far behind.
posted on 19/1/16
comment by Bobby Dazzler (U1449)
posted 5 minutes ago
How would Corbyn be dangerous and who to?
..................
The British public.
posted on 19/1/16
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 0 seconds ago
comment by Bobby Dazzler (U1449)
posted 5 minutes ago
How would Corbyn be dangerous and who to?
..................
The British public.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Come on then
posted on 19/1/16
That's actually a good shout VC, Kim Jong-Un is Stalin in disguise.
posted on 19/1/16
comment by yeah yeah (U17250)
posted 14 seconds ago
How would Corbyn be dangerous and who to?**
Not enough time this evening to list how dangerous he would be and you wouldnt agree anyway, I can tell you by your replies, when Cameron is the other option I can see why people get sucked in by this guy
====================
At best you'll trot out the usual misinterpretations of his positions on things, so probably best not bother. There's enough Corbyn-smearing going on across the entire media spectrum (including an apparently quite overt campaign of undermining from the BBC, See: http://www.medialens.org/index.php/alerts/alert-archive/2016/810-our-only-fear-was-that-he-might-pull-his-punches-bbc-caught-manipulating-the-news.html and http://www.medialens.org/index.php/alerts/alert-archive/2015/803-nuclear-war-and-corbyn-the-fury-and-the-farce.html and http://www.medialens.org/index.php/alerts/alert-archive/2015/800-corbyn-and-the-end-of-time-the-crisis-of-democracy.html)
posted on 19/1/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 19/1/16
comment by Bobby Dazzler (U1449)
posted 3 minutes ago
comment by Vidicschin (U3584)
posted 0 seconds ago
comment by Bobby Dazzler (U1449)
posted 5 minutes ago
How would Corbyn be dangerous and who to?
..................
The British public.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Come on then
...............
Come on then what?
posted on 19/1/16
You were about to explain how Corbyn would be dangerous to the British public
posted on 19/1/16
Tomkins
Not as dangerous as Corbyn. Who wants to scrap our great country's defence entirely and pray for world peace
You`ve been reading too many comics mate. Amazing how the right wing press can brainwash so many people with nonsense about Jeremy Corbyn.
If you think Nuclear Weapons are a great country`s defence, then you are about as stupid as the press that perpetrate the same nonsense.
posted on 19/1/16
At best you'll trot out the usual misinterpretations of his positions on things**
It's only viewed as a misinterpretation if you dont agree with it, but for the Jeremy fans like yourself it would clearly be a waste of time, I will take great pleasure in knowing that I wasn't one of the people that were sucked in by him, meanwhile here is a letter I've received from Berbaking from JA606
posted on 19/1/16
comment by TUX (U5315)
posted 7 minutes ago
comment by Stretford_Ender85 (U10955)
posted 3 minutes ago
Its not a deterrent if you fire in retaliation and if you fire first, you're the lunatic.
Meaning? Nuclear deterrents are a waste of money.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
5* 's
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Really? The point of having one is that you will never HAVE to retaliate. Because nobody will fire at you, knowing you COULD retaliate. That's what makes it a deterrent.
posted on 19/1/16
Come on then what?**
This is where you are supposed to be elaborating on your comment so he can tell you how wrong you are and why
Imagine Sharia Law under Corbyn...boy
posted on 19/1/16
Trump is a shameless politician with no morals, who'd do anything to get in to power. I've read somewhere that he used to have pro immigration policies few years ago. When that didnt quite work on public, he made a complete U turn and started pandering to the idiotic redneck base in US.
As someone said earlier, he is the most dangerous person in the world at the moment because he doesnt have any principles and he will shameless pander to his vote base if he gets the power
posted on 19/1/16
I don't think there's that many dumb americans
****
I almost wet myself when I read that
posted on 19/1/16
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/10/04/12/2D114B1F00000578-0-image-m-96_1443957873638.jpg
The most dangerous man alive.
posted on 19/1/16
Can we stay on track please troops.
Donald Trump, wazzock or statesman?
posted on 19/1/16
t's only viewed as a misinterpretation if you dont agree with it
------------------------
Not at all. All about evidence.
I scarcely knew who he was before he started making headway in the leadership race.
I've also provided three pieces of analysis from Media Lens, who have produced the leading academic analysis and study of the British press for nearly decades.
If you can provide evidence for your apparent claims, go for it.
posted on 19/1/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 19/1/16
As Commander and Chief he has the final say if America was ever to go to war. Not even the Senate can save our ar5es...Basically we're f00ked if he was ever to get in. A Ronald Regan, Arnold Schwarzenegger kind celebrity voting could be on the cards.
posted on 19/1/16
comment by yeah yeah (U17250)
posted 1 minute ago
Come on then what?**
This is where you are supposed to be elaborating on your comment so he can tell you how wrong you are and why
Imagine Sharia Law under Corbyn...boy
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You still don't actually know what Sharia means do you?
posted on 19/1/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 19/1/16
comment by Clockwork Red (U4892)
Really? The point of having one is that you will never HAVE to retaliate. Because nobody will fire at you, knowing you COULD retaliate. That's what makes it a deterrent.
---------------------------
Flawed on every level. I've already posted this on this thread but people don't much like changing their minds but I'll give it a go anyway:
http://www.sgr.org.uk/resources/trident-deterrence-and-uk-security
Page 2 of 30
6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10