or to join or start a new Discussion

Articles/all comments
These 130 comments are related to an article called:

What a day of sport

Page 5 of 6

posted on 11/7/16

Andy Murray, along with Nadal, Djokovic, and Federer would beat the previous generations of tennis champions as they're on another level with regards to fitness, diet, power, skill and preparation.

posted on 11/7/16

Spot on Juke. Becker McEnroe, Connors etc wouldn't have a prayer of beating Murray in a five setter

comment by lauders (U9757)

posted on 11/7/16

I think I love Andy Murray

Utter hero.
All these warmers taking it for granted as well.
We won't get it this good again

posted on 11/7/16

I don't think Federer would have won as many titles as he has if he had faced a real challenge for many of the years he was on top. Once Nadal then Djokovic broke through he wasn't winning as much.

His early titles he was up against some fading stars.

A great player I have no doubt but I rate Djokovic above him. Djokovic has done it with Nadal, Federer and Murray chasing all the same titles.

posted on 11/7/16

Guy is a legend and people probably won't realise how good we had it until we are back to hoping the likes of henman, jeremy Edwards or the Canadian guy make it as far as the semi final

I does depress me however that a guy who went to the same school as me made 2 million in under 3 hours.

It's crazy he has achieved what he has given where he has come from

posted on 11/7/16

Aye Djokovic is top of the pile for me.. The mental resilience he shows is frightening.

Dominating in the toughest era of tennis is remarkable. He's a machine.

To think it was only a few years ago he was being written off as he kept losing to Nadal and Federer.

Just a shame for us that he has that mental edge over Murray, but the gap is closing.

posted on 11/7/16

Sampras is still the greatest for me

even at height of Federer's dominance, you always felt he could lose

Sampras, he was unstoppable, I was genuinely stunned when Federer knocked him out of Wimbledon in 2001

apart from his blip against Kraciek (sp) in 96 Sampras no one came near him

posted on 11/7/16

Sampras didn't have much in the way of competition though.

Much like Federer he had it fairly easy.

posted on 11/7/16

you could make an arguemtnfor anyone, could say that Djokvic is only dominating because nadal is injury prone and Federer is coming to end of his career

Sampras blew everyone away, Agassi , Rafter, Ivanisevic, Becker

posted on 11/7/16

Yeah djokovic stands tall for domination against 3 other guys capable of his level. Given he had so much adversity to overcome in his youth coming from Serbia

That said it's all null and void as he is clearly a roid freak and is now struggling due to his favorite substances being made illegal..... Allegedly

posted on 11/7/16

Yea he's really struggling this year

posted on 11/7/16

comment by super phoenix rangers - Moth (U14864)
posted 7 minutes ago
Yeah djokovic stands tall for domination against 3 other guys capable of his level. Given he had so much adversity to overcome in his youth coming from Serbia

That said it's all null and void as he is clearly a roid freak and is now struggling due to his favorite substances being made illegal..... Allegedly
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Really?

posted on 11/7/16

comment by Murnetti X (U3627)
posted 2 minutes ago
comment by super phoenix rangers - Moth (U14864)
posted 7 minutes ago
Yeah djokovic stands tall for domination against 3 other guys capable of his level. Given he had so much adversity to overcome in his youth coming from Serbia

That said it's all null and void as he is clearly a roid freak and is now struggling due to his favorite substances being made illegal..... Allegedly
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Really?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
allegedly = i made that up

although i do have my suspicions. Allegedly

posted on 11/7/16



Bassa I thought you had some insight into a potential scoop

posted on 11/7/16

comment by Dennis Z - HULLO HULLO WE ARE THE BILLY BOYS (U20179)
posted 17 minutes ago
you could make an arguemtnfor anyone, could say that Djokvic is only dominating because nadal is injury prone and Federer is coming to end of his career

Sampras blew everyone away, Agassi , Rafter, Ivanisevic, Becker
----------------------------------------------------------------------
All of those players you mention were at the tail end of their careers.

Djokovic beat Federer and Nadal when they were still in their prime. The rest of the top 20 are of a higher standard than they were in previous eras too.

posted on 11/7/16

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

posted on 11/7/16

JUst pure conjecture given djokovic was very sympathetic around the circumstances and substance sharapova was caught with.

Murray however was the opposite but came out with a very loaded statement saying he had seen people after 5 set finals recover far more quickly than naturally possible.

Thats enough for me, Guilty! Allegedly

comment by Ghod#18 (U9390)

posted on 11/7/16

Nadal in 2010 played the best tennis of my lifetime

Federer is the most naturally gifted ever

posted on 11/7/16

DFjok has beaten them yes, but he is dominating them now, why?

nadal - injury prone
Federer - end of career

all objective opinions though, for me it's sampras

comment by Ghod#18 (U9390)

posted on 11/7/16

its Federer

posted on 11/7/16

naw its no

posted on 11/7/16

apparently Andy Murrays career winnings are just shy of 50 million. I would guess he earns as much if not more from sponsorship like Underarmour and Adidas previously.

Sickening!

Another point about Murray has any other player won all but one of their teams points in the entire davis cup campaign while winning it?

Thats rather an Insane stat.

posted on 11/7/16

Comment deleted by Site Moderator

comment by Paddy (U5235)

posted on 11/7/16

comment by Zachsda (As is fitting Rangers play first) (U1850)

Cannae wait to argue about football again.Tennis is no the same.I don't know what religion any cant is, so how am i meant to judge if they are good or not
__

Very true Zach.

As long as you remember the daft prods are the erseholes and the delightful kafflicks are awesome then that's all that matters really

posted on 11/7/16

kaffliks are the spawn of the anti Christ

they have some bad points too

Page 5 of 6

Sign in if you want to comment