I was going to go into that Vic but couldn't be bothered. However it's easier to describe any discrimination of colour/nation/creed or race as racism imo as to not confuse people.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by Nickalopodis (U9257)
posted 52 seconds ago
I was going to go into that Vic but couldn't be bothered. However it's easier to describe any discrimination of colour/nation/creed or race as racism imo as to not confuse people.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes but labelling someone racist is lazy and makes a mockery of the word and people who have suffered racial abuse.
Most of these idiots call Trump racist because it's simply the cool thing on social media to do, fact is to this moment in time he has not said anything racist.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Where if given a night with him and had dinner and a couple of bottles of wine his racist side may come out, I have to agree with Vic in that I have not seen any straight up racist comment from him. He's not that stupid.
He is a public clown though, but he seems to be winning somehow.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
There are a handful of black people who support the Klan.
Shows how the world is turning into a total madhouse. We're even debating as to whether America should or should not elect an idiotic, racist, and somewhat dangerous buffoon into power of one of the powerful countries in the world.
As for Clinton? Does that question really need to be answered considering who he is running against?
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 15 seconds ago
There are a handful of black people who support the Klan.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The Klan what era do you live in? The Klan is dead, you do know there hasn't being a murder by the KKK since 1987 get along with the times jesus.
There is bigger threats in America right now like the Mexican drug cartels, BLM and Radical Islam but your still worried about a hate group that has been defunct for decades The white guilt is strong with this one.
Has to be Clinton. Purely because it shouldn't be Trump at any price.
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 29 minutes ago
As I said, would never entertain supporting either, however the upside to a Trump presidency could be the destruction of the current corrupt system (things maybe have to get worse before they get better in a sense)
---------------------------------------------
Think back to how the hard left in 1930s Germany was more concerned with defeating the soft left than uniting against right, and how some glib voices saw the rise of Hitler as an opportunity.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
RR, like I said trump would an absolute disaster of a president. However he is a symptom of the current system not the antidote he portrays himself as. In that sense the established way of politics in the US is the disease, something which Clinton represents in spades. I'm in no way advocating that Trump winning is preferable to Clinton. I'm saying if it does happen it needs to be used as an opportunity for change. OK it didn't work in 1930s Germany but we live in a different era, people are more questioning than ever before to BS we are fed.
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
Nothing wrong with rustling a few feathers, cant see what people have against trump. Speaks his mind and speaks the truth instead of cowering away and being told what to say. The truth hurts unfortunately and there are a lot of people backing him clearly.
comment by United we win (U19958)
posted 4 minutes ago
think America should worry about China, cause after they ruin themselves and can't sort out their mountain of debt, corrupt capitalism system, China will take a dump on them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
China need a strong America to buy off them or else they suffer themselves
comment by Shaun M - Diagoraga! , your midfields terrified, Diagoraga! (U9955)
posted 1 minute ago
Nothing wrong with rustling a few feathers, cant see what people have against trump. Speaks his mind and speaks the truth instead of cowering away and being told what to say. The truth hurts unfortunately and there are a lot of people backing him clearly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's what the Germans thought as Hitler crossed the boarder into their country.
comment by Tiddles LFC (U17634)
posted 2 hours ago
No, it's still an easy decision.
You're talking about a man who wants to build a wall to keep Mexico out, and send them the bill. If they refuse to pay he wants to use force to make them pay.
A man who wants to stop any Muslim people from entering the country, and the ones currently there to be put on a database and wear a form of identification, a badge or armband. If that sounds familiar to you, that's because hitler used it with the Jewish people.
A man who's solution to all the gun violence and shootings currently occurring in the states is to add more guns.
So no robb, it's not a hard decision. It's a very very easy decision.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You think these ideas would pass congress?
Trumps career proves, he may be an idiot, but my god he hires fantastically well.
A lot of ignorance of the duplicitous and criminal nature of Hillary Clinton on this thread.
Of all the democrats that could lose an election to Trump, by polarizing the democrats vote, it is she.
In a general election, Sanders would in fact likely siphon votes away from Trump, as moderate Republicans and independents recoiled from the specter of Trump in the White House. By contrast, the hatred towards Clinton guarantees a strong right wing turnout, and poses a serious risk of a low democrat turnout. A low turnout at the election sees Trump win it.
Anyone who has paid even the slightest bit of attention to American politics knows that Clinton is: a warmonger (Libya; vigorous defender of Bush's Iraq policy); at best, indifferent to the global environmental crisis; a bedfellow of Goldman Sachs and the big pharmaceutical companies.
All of the above also discounts the fact that she's being investigated by the FBI for mishandling classified information as secretary of state...
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
comment by United we win (U19958)
posted 20 minutes ago
you don't have to outright make racism comments to be racist. even he is not that silly ffs. he is at the very least a very prejudiced man and will divide america even more than it is.. but that country is going to come down one day anyway.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who's he going to divide?
we live in a different era, people are more questioning than ever before to BS we are fed
-----------------------------------------
People are less trusting of mainstream media authority, but that doesn't mean we have a better filter for the veracity of information. Thanks to digital media, we now live in bubbles, with a tailored reality and bespoke facts to suit our preferences. Trump (and Brexit) couldn't have lied with impunity a generation ago.
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 30 seconds ago
we live in a different era, people are more questioning than ever before to BS we are fed
-----------------------------------------
People are less trusting of mainstream media authority, but that doesn't mean we have a better filter for the veracity of information. Thanks to digital media, we now live in bubbles, with a tailored reality and bespoke facts to suit our preferences. Trump (and Brexit) couldn't have lied with impunity a generation ago.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why just put trump? Why not Hilary too?
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
The wall does make sense, it will stop a lot of drug and human traffic I ng, how else do you control a 2000 mile border?
Sign in if you want to comment
Trump or Clinton?
Page 2 of 6
6
posted on 26/7/16
I was going to go into that Vic but couldn't be bothered. However it's easier to describe any discrimination of colour/nation/creed or race as racism imo as to not confuse people.
posted on 26/7/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 26/7/16
comment by Nickalopodis (U9257)
posted 52 seconds ago
I was going to go into that Vic but couldn't be bothered. However it's easier to describe any discrimination of colour/nation/creed or race as racism imo as to not confuse people.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yes but labelling someone racist is lazy and makes a mockery of the word and people who have suffered racial abuse.
Most of these idiots call Trump racist because it's simply the cool thing on social media to do, fact is to this moment in time he has not said anything racist.
posted on 26/7/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 26/7/16
Where if given a night with him and had dinner and a couple of bottles of wine his racist side may come out, I have to agree with Vic in that I have not seen any straight up racist comment from him. He's not that stupid.
He is a public clown though, but he seems to be winning somehow.
posted on 26/7/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 26/7/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 26/7/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 26/7/16
There are a handful of black people who support the Klan.
posted on 26/7/16
Shows how the world is turning into a total madhouse. We're even debating as to whether America should or should not elect an idiotic, racist, and somewhat dangerous buffoon into power of one of the powerful countries in the world.
As for Clinton? Does that question really need to be answered considering who he is running against?
posted on 26/7/16
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 15 seconds ago
There are a handful of black people who support the Klan.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
The Klan what era do you live in? The Klan is dead, you do know there hasn't being a murder by the KKK since 1987 get along with the times jesus.
There is bigger threats in America right now like the Mexican drug cartels, BLM and Radical Islam but your still worried about a hate group that has been defunct for decades The white guilt is strong with this one.
posted on 26/7/16
Has to be Clinton. Purely because it shouldn't be Trump at any price.
posted on 26/7/16
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 29 minutes ago
As I said, would never entertain supporting either, however the upside to a Trump presidency could be the destruction of the current corrupt system (things maybe have to get worse before they get better in a sense)
---------------------------------------------
Think back to how the hard left in 1930s Germany was more concerned with defeating the soft left than uniting against right, and how some glib voices saw the rise of Hitler as an opportunity.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
RR, like I said trump would an absolute disaster of a president. However he is a symptom of the current system not the antidote he portrays himself as. In that sense the established way of politics in the US is the disease, something which Clinton represents in spades. I'm in no way advocating that Trump winning is preferable to Clinton. I'm saying if it does happen it needs to be used as an opportunity for change. OK it didn't work in 1930s Germany but we live in a different era, people are more questioning than ever before to BS we are fed.
posted on 26/7/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 26/7/16
Nothing wrong with rustling a few feathers, cant see what people have against trump. Speaks his mind and speaks the truth instead of cowering away and being told what to say. The truth hurts unfortunately and there are a lot of people backing him clearly.
posted on 26/7/16
comment by United we win (U19958)
posted 4 minutes ago
think America should worry about China, cause after they ruin themselves and can't sort out their mountain of debt, corrupt capitalism system, China will take a dump on them.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
China need a strong America to buy off them or else they suffer themselves
posted on 26/7/16
comment by Shaun M - Diagoraga! , your midfields terrified, Diagoraga! (U9955)
posted 1 minute ago
Nothing wrong with rustling a few feathers, cant see what people have against trump. Speaks his mind and speaks the truth instead of cowering away and being told what to say. The truth hurts unfortunately and there are a lot of people backing him clearly.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
That's what the Germans thought as Hitler crossed the boarder into their country.
posted on 26/7/16
comment by Tiddles LFC (U17634)
posted 2 hours ago
No, it's still an easy decision.
You're talking about a man who wants to build a wall to keep Mexico out, and send them the bill. If they refuse to pay he wants to use force to make them pay.
A man who wants to stop any Muslim people from entering the country, and the ones currently there to be put on a database and wear a form of identification, a badge or armband. If that sounds familiar to you, that's because hitler used it with the Jewish people.
A man who's solution to all the gun violence and shootings currently occurring in the states is to add more guns.
So no robb, it's not a hard decision. It's a very very easy decision.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You think these ideas would pass congress?
Trumps career proves, he may be an idiot, but my god he hires fantastically well.
posted on 26/7/16
A lot of ignorance of the duplicitous and criminal nature of Hillary Clinton on this thread.
Of all the democrats that could lose an election to Trump, by polarizing the democrats vote, it is she.
In a general election, Sanders would in fact likely siphon votes away from Trump, as moderate Republicans and independents recoiled from the specter of Trump in the White House. By contrast, the hatred towards Clinton guarantees a strong right wing turnout, and poses a serious risk of a low democrat turnout. A low turnout at the election sees Trump win it.
Anyone who has paid even the slightest bit of attention to American politics knows that Clinton is: a warmonger (Libya; vigorous defender of Bush's Iraq policy); at best, indifferent to the global environmental crisis; a bedfellow of Goldman Sachs and the big pharmaceutical companies.
All of the above also discounts the fact that she's being investigated by the FBI for mishandling classified information as secretary of state...
posted on 26/7/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 26/7/16
comment by United we win (U19958)
posted 20 minutes ago
you don't have to outright make racism comments to be racist. even he is not that silly ffs. he is at the very least a very prejudiced man and will divide america even more than it is.. but that country is going to come down one day anyway.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Who's he going to divide?
posted on 26/7/16
we live in a different era, people are more questioning than ever before to BS we are fed
-----------------------------------------
People are less trusting of mainstream media authority, but that doesn't mean we have a better filter for the veracity of information. Thanks to digital media, we now live in bubbles, with a tailored reality and bespoke facts to suit our preferences. Trump (and Brexit) couldn't have lied with impunity a generation ago.
posted on 26/7/16
comment by Red Russian (U4715)
posted 30 seconds ago
we live in a different era, people are more questioning than ever before to BS we are fed
-----------------------------------------
People are less trusting of mainstream media authority, but that doesn't mean we have a better filter for the veracity of information. Thanks to digital media, we now live in bubbles, with a tailored reality and bespoke facts to suit our preferences. Trump (and Brexit) couldn't have lied with impunity a generation ago.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why just put trump? Why not Hilary too?
posted on 26/7/16
Comment deleted by Site Moderator
posted on 26/7/16
The wall does make sense, it will stop a lot of drug and human traffic I ng, how else do you control a 2000 mile border?
Page 2 of 6
6